• Hours & Info

    (562) 495-0554
    M-F: 8:00am - 6:00 p.m.
    Sat: 9:00 a.m. - 12:00 p.m.
  • Past Blog Posts

  • https://api.whatsapp.com/send?phone=13104885414

USC Spouse denied due process because immigrant spouse denied a visa?

Supreme Court Holds U.S. Citizen Spouse Was Not Deprived of Due Process

In a 5-4 decision, the Supreme Court vacated the Ninth Circuit’s decision in Kerry v. Dinand remanded. The plurality held that because the respondent, a U.S. citizen, was not deprived of “life, liberty, or property,” the government did not deny her any constitutional due process right when it denied her spouse a visa, and that the Due Process Clause did not require the government to explain its decision to deny the visa.

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/spouse/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/spouse-visa/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/undocumented-spouse/

https://californiaimmigration.us/dont-keep-getting-abused-file-a-battered-spouse-petition/

Ineffective assistance of counsel? You can file the Motion to Reopen past the 90 day deadline

In an 8-1 decision, the Supreme Court reversed the Fifth Circuit’s decision in Mata v. Holderand remanded, holding that a court of appeals has jurisdiction to review a denial of a petitioner’s request to equitably toll the deadline on a motion to reopen.

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/motion-to-reopen-2/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/motion-to-reopen/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/motion-to-reopen-mtr/

https://californiaimmigration.us/motion-to-reopen-granted-2/

Another suit from Arizona on violating immigrants rights

Civil rights groups, including the American Immigration Council, filed a lawsuit against the U.S. Border Patrol in federal district court in Tucson on Monday, alleging that immigrants were unlawfully detained and mistreated for extended periods in freezing, filthy holding cells in Arizona. The complaint states that the immigrants suffered a wide range of abuse and neglect, including being held in overcrowded cells and denied adequate food, water, sleep, and medical care.

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/rights-of-aliens/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/know-your-rights/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/human-rights-watch-hrw/

https://californiaimmigration.us/information-regarding-filing-complaints-of-discrimination-civil-rights-violations-and-racial-profiling-towards-immigrants/

What if the applicant in asylum has mental issues?

In a precedent decision, the BIA sustained in part the respondent’s appeal, holding that if an asylum applicant has mental competency issues that affect the reliability of his testimony, then the Immigration Judge should, as a safeguard, generally accept the applicant’s fear of harm as subjectively genuine based on the applicant’s perception of events.aslu

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/asylum-2/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/appeal-asylum/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/asylum/

https://californiaimmigration.us/how-to-apply-for-political-asylum/

Supreme Court Holds That Only Substances Defined as “Controlled” Under §802 Trigger Removal

The Supreme Court reversed the Eighth Circuit, finding that INA §237(a)(2)(B)(i) triggers removal only when the government can prove a connection between an element of an immigrant’s drug conviction and a “controlled substance” as defined in 21 USC §802.

Cancellation for removal

Removal proceedings

Removal of the conditional residence 

Can I be removed?

The U.S. Supreme Court yesterday left in place last year’s Ninth Circuit decision to strike down a 2006 Arizona law that denied bail to undocumented immigrants charged with “serious” felonies. Six members of the Supreme Court declined to hear an appeal from Arizona Sherriff Joseph Arpaio to reinstate the Arizona law, overruling three of the more conservative members of the Court—Justices Clarence Thomas, Antonin Scalia and Samuel Alito—who said they would have heard the case.

Arizona Law

Arizona immigration law

Arizona on violating immigrants rights

The Law Offices of Brian D. Lerner

DHS extended the designation of Somalia for Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for 18 months from September 18, 2015, through March 17, 2017. The 60-day re-registration period runs from June 1, 2015, through July 31, 2015.

Extension of TPS

TPS for 18 months

Temporary protected status

Law Offices of Brian D. Lerner

The Ninth Circuit granted the petition for review and remanded, holding that the petitioner’s conviction for grand theft, in violation of California Penal Code §487(a), was not a categorical aggravated felony, because the statute is doubly overbroad in that it permits a conviction for theft of labor while the generic definition of theft does not, and also permits a conviction for a consensual taking.

Aggravated felony

Felony conviction

Violent felony

Felony immigration violation

The Ninth Circuit reversed, holding that if ICE detains an immigrant pending potential criminal prosecution, then that detention constitutes “official detention” within the meaning of 18 USC §3585(b), and the immigrant is accordingly entitled to credit toward his or her criminal sentence. The court also held that an immigrant is entitled to credit for all time spent in ICE detention subsequent to his or her indictment or the filing of formal criminal charges against him or her.

Types of crime

Find a criminal attorney

Criminal charges

The criminal waiver

USCIS began accepting applications for employment authorization from certain H-4 dependent spouses of H-1B nonimmigrants who are seeking employment-based lawful permanent resident status. USCIS published a revised Form I-765, Application for Employment Authorization, with an edition date of February 13, 2015, which contains the eligibility category (c)(26) for H-4 dependent spouses. While USCIS will continue to accept previous editions of the form, USCIS indicates that H-4 applicants should use the revised form to prevent delays or RFEs. On Sunday, a federal district court denied a motion for a preliminary injunction to stop DHS from implementing the H-4 final rule.

H-4 status

H-4 applicant

H-4 work authorization

Law Offices of Brian D. Lerner