• Hours & Info

    M-F: 8:00am - 6:00 p.m.
    Sat: 9:00 a.m. - 12:00 p.m.
  • Past Blog Posts

  • https://api.whatsapp.com/send?phone=13104885414

What is H-2B Visas?

This is a visa to meet temporary needs (H-2’s.) U.S. employers may petition for skilled or unskilled alien workers to meet temporary or seasonal needs in positions for which qualified U.S. workers are not available. It is important to note that both the services for which the employer requests H-2 labor approval and the employer’s need for such services must be temporary. There is currently an annual cap of 66,000 visas for H-2B workers. There is currently no annual cap on visas for H-2A workers. The Department of Labor has compiled a list of H-2B Program Certifications By Occupation for the period June 1, 1999 to May 31, 2000.

The first step to hiring an H-2 worker from outside the U.S. is for the employer to apply for a temporary labor certification with the Department of Labor. These certificates are designed to assure that the admission of aliens to work in this country on a temporary basis will not adversely affect the job opportunities, wages, or working conditions of U.S. workers. The employer is required to file the labor certification with the I-129 petition. For specific procedures on filing, please visit the Department of Labor’s Employment and Training Administration.

Dependents (spouses and unmarried children under 21 years of age) of H-2 workers are entitled to H-4 status with the same restrictions as the principal. Dependents may not be employed under the H-4 classification. A single petition may cover multiple workers if:

  • they will perform the same services
    -they will work in the same location
    -they are included on the same labor certification and,
    -they come from places that are served by the same U.S. consulate, or, if visa exempt, they will enter at the same port of entry.
    -It is not necessary to identify requested H-2A beneficiaries by name (unless only a single worker is needed) if they are unnamed on the underlying labor certification. H-2B beneficiaries must be named unless circumstances (e.g. emergencies) make identification by name impossible. The number of unnamed beneficiaries must always be stated on the petition.
  • H-2A and H-2B 
  • H-2A meaning
  • H-2B Attorney
  • Employment based visas

H-1B Specialty Worker Visa

If you have a college education and a sponsor in the United States, you may qualify for this visa. American Immigration permits this type of specialty occupation work visas. It can be approved in as fast as two to three months. This visa is usually issued for a period of three years. Should you decide to stay longer, it can be extended for another 3 years. There are a limited number of these visas per year, and therefore, if you have a sponsor, you should get started right away. As a sponsor, you must pay the prevailing wage to the employee. The prevailing wage is the wage that prevails generally and is the normal wage for that type of position. When the H-1B is being prepared, the government will let us know what is the prevailing wage.

If you later decide you want a green card, you can apply for ‘Labor Certification’ while you have your Specialty Occupation Visa. Your spouse and children can come to the U.S. once you are approved. Additionally, your children can go to school without any problem.

Can I apply for Student Visa?

This is the Student Visa. It allows you to come to the U.S. to study at a wide variety of educational institutions ranging from large Universities to community colleges to specialized institutions such as cooking schools. This visa can also be used for you to come to the U.S. to study English.

F-1 nonimmigrant student (F-1 student) means an alien who has an F-1 visa.  The Bureau of Citizenship and Immigration Services grants such a visa to an alien who has a residence in a foreign country which he/she has no intention of abandoning, who is a bona fide student qualified to pursue a full course of study and who entered the United States temporarily and solely for the purpose of pursuing such a course of study at an established institution of learning or other recognized place of study in the United States, particularly designated by him/her and approved by the Attorney General after consultation with the Department of Education of the United States.

The Student Visa will last for as long as you are in school which depends upon the length of the course of study. Your spouse and unmarried children can come to the U.S. once your visa is approved. You can later change your status to allow you to work.

If you are out of status because of some type of violation of your F-1 Student Visa, you should try to apply for reinstatement of student status. Assuming you did not work out of status, there would be a reasonable chance of success, especially if the reason for you going out of status was not your fault.

Change status to Student Visa

F-1 student visa meaning

Student Visa Process

Can I apply for Student Visa?

How to begin preparation for an E-2 Visa?

  1. Make sure you are from a Treaty-Investor Country

The U.S. has treaties with many different countries around the world. However, if there is no treaty with the counry that you were born in, then it will not qualify you for an E-2 Visa.

  1. Make sure you have enough money to invest

There is no set number. However, the general guideline is that you want to have around $100,000 to invest in your own company in the U.S.

  1. Make sure you will manage the company

You need to make certain that you will manage the company in a supervisory or managerial capacity and not as a line type worker.

  1. Make sure you are in status

If you are inside the U.S. and will be doing a change of status, you will want to make sure that you are in legal status and have not violated your status in anyway. Otherwise, you might not be able to change your status to E-2.

  1. Keep all of your receipts and contracts

Once you would get the E-2, you need to make sure that you keep all of the receipts and contracts so that when it becomes time to renew the E-2, you are able to provide the necessary proof.

E-2 visa lawyer

E-2 visa petition

E-2 visa process

Apply for investment visa

E1/E2 Treaty Investor Trader Visas

This is the premier business Visa. If you are interested in starting your own business in the United States, you may qualify for the Treaty Investor Visa. People who want to come to the U.S. quickly and efficiently to start their own business, or to purchase an existing business can use this Visa. Numerous countries around the world have a treaty with the U.S., and it is people from these countries that can come to the U.S. on the E1 or E2 Visa.  This visa is for the entrepreneur.

The E1/E2 Visa is known as the Treaty Investor (E2) or Treaty-Trader (E1) Visa. If you want to set up a company to trade with your home country, then you may qualify as a treaty trader. This Visa does not need prior BCIS approval, and therefore, once it is properly prepared, it can be sent directly to the U.S. Consulate. This means when you and your family want to enter the U.S. rapidly to get the business operational or to do a 5 month transition of ownership, this is the perfect Visa.

There is no set minimum or maximum amount that must be invested. Our law firm will help you with the entire process. This visa can be approved in as fast as 1 to 2 months. All unmarried children under the age of 21 years and your spouse can come to the U.S. once you qualify. The children can go to school without any problems.

Our firm will prepare the E1/E2 petition in an expert manner. Additionally, a complex and detailed Business Plan will be prepared.

Finally, our firm offers an additional service. One of our immigration attorneys will accompany you to the U.S. Consulate to aid with the interview and ensure that the Consulate process goes smoothly and efficiently.

E-1 and E-2 visa

E-2 visa application

E-2 visa lawyer

The E-2 visa process

Adoption Issues

A. Children Born Out of Wedlock

The prospective adoptive parent(s) should be aware that although a child may be born out of wedlock, that child may still have two parents.

A child born out of wedlock in a country that has not eliminated all legal distinctions between “legitimate” and “illegitimate”, and who has not been legitimated under the laws of the child’s or father’s residence or domicile, has a sole parent — his or her mother — unless the child has or had a bona fide relationship with the father.

If the child has or had a bona fide relationship with his or her father, the child may be considered to have a sole parent — his or her mother — only if the father has disappeared, abandoned, deserted, or in writing irrevocably released the child for emigration and adoption.

In both cases it must be evident that the mother is incapable of providing proper care for the child according to the standards of the country where she and the child reside and, in writing, irrevocably releases the child for emigration and adoption.

If a child is born out of wedlock in a country that has eliminated all legal distinctions between “legitimate” and “illegitimate”, paternity has been established, and the father has recognized or acknowledged the child, that child is considered “legitimated” with the child having both parents, not a sole parent.

Adoptive and prospective adoptive parents of children who were born out of wedlock should become familiar with the legitimacy laws in the countries where the children were born and/or live. If a child born out of wedlock is from a country which has eliminated all legal distinctions between legitimate and illegitimate, the child may still qualify for classification as an orphan under U.S. immigration law as long as there is proof that paternity has not been acknowledged or established before the civil authorities in that country. Prospective adoptive parent(s) may obtain information regarding a specific country’s legitimacy laws from BCIS or the Department of State.

B. Legitimated Children

Most countries have legal procedures for the legitimation of children by their natural fathers. Accordingly, adoptive and prospective adoptive parents of children born out of wedlock should become familiar with the laws of a foreign country to determine how children become legitimated. A legitimated child has all the same rights as a child born in wedlock. A legitimated child from any country has two legal parents and cannot qualify as a orphan unless only one of the parents is living or both of the parents have abandoned the child.

C. Abandonment

A child abandoned by both parents may qualify as an orphan under U.S. immigration law.

INS regulations state that a child who has been unconditionally abandoned to an orphanage is considered to have no parents. A child is not deemed abandoned, however, when he or she has been temporarily placed in an orphanage and the parent or parents are contributing or trying to contribute to the child’s support, or the parent or parents otherwise show that they have not ended their parental obligations to the child.

While a finding of abandonment may normally be made when the child is in the custody of an orphanage or an orphanage-like institution, the definition of the term “abandonment” is not limited to those instances. Children in other situations could possibly be considered abandoned, but adoptive or prospective adoptive parents seeking to prove the claimed abandonment should obtain legal documentation from a competent authority in the country where the child resides.

For example, in a case where a child is a ward of the court, the parents must refuse to meet their parental and legal obligations to care for and support their child and give up parental claims to the child. On the other hand, if the natural parents are deprived of custody only temporarily and afforded a chance to care for the child, the child would not be considered an orphan.

Also, a relinquishment or release of a child by the biological parents to the prospective adoptive parents or for a specific adoption does not constitute abandonment.

Occasionally, some persons will try to make a child appear to have been abandoned in order to facilitate the child’s immigration to the United States. If a child has been designated a ward of the court merely as a contrivance, the child would not qualify as an orphan. If the decree declaring the child to be a ward of the court does not describe circumstances establishing that he or she is an orphan, other proof of abandonment must be submitted in support of the petition.

D. Intra-Familial Adoptions

Prospective adoptive parents wishing to adopt a family member may encounter problems that are not found in other adoption cases. Most will find it difficult to prove that the child meets the definition of an orphan under U.S. immigration law.

As stated previously, a child is a orphan only if the sole or surviving parent is unable to care for the child properly according to the standards of the country where the parent and child reside and has, in writing, irrevocably released the child for emigration and adoption; or if the child has been abandoned or deserted by, separated or lost from, both parents, or if both parents have disappeared or died.

Additional documentation is required to verify the claim of abandonment, desertion, separation from both parents or that both parents have disappeared or died.

Once the child has been irrevocably released by the natural parents, the parents can never gain any immigration benefit through the child.

E. Some Problems Faced by Adoptive and Prospective Adoptive Parent(s) of Foreign-Born Children

The adoptive and prospective adoptive parent(s) of foreign-born children face complex requirements which appear in the law itself. BCIS has kept the documentary, regulatory and procedural requirements to a minimum, while conforming with the intent of the law. In addition to BCIS requirements, petitions for orphans must also comply with state and foreign adoption laws.

The laws of some countries do not permit adoption. Laws of other countries restrict persons eligible to adopt children. There are children legally adopted abroad who do not qualify as orphans according the U.S. immigration laws (see definition of orphan in Appendix B). The adoptive and prospective adoptive parent(s) should be aware that not all children adopted abroad are orphans, and what appears to be a foreign adoption may not comply with the laws of the foreign state; and some valid foreign adoptions are not sufficient to classify the adopted person as a “child” under U.S. immigration law.

It is the responsibility of the petitioner to prove to BCIS that a child is eligible for classification as an orphan for immigration purposes. The evidence must be in the form of documents. This evidence may vary, depending on the facts of the case. Therefore, it is sometimes necessary to submit documents in addition to those described in Section II, B, Forms Used for an Orphan Petition.

Investigation Issues

When a request is sent to an orphan or registered in a U.S. embassy or consulate for the possible acquisition of an immigrant visa for a child, an orphan of research abroad as part of normal procedure. This research is conducted by the consular officer of the Department of State or an officer of the BCIS for those posts where the BCIS has an office. The officer will make every effort to expedite the investigation, but the process may take a longer time. Before arranging the trip, the adoptive parents who are going abroad to complete the formalities, please contact the appropriate U.S. embassy or consulate, or the foreign office of the BCIS to request information about the terms of the process. The objective of this research is to confirm that the child is an orphan under the Immigration Law of the United States, and that the child has no illness or disability that has not been specified in the solicitation of an orphan. If the child does not comply with the requirements for classification as an orphan under the Immigration Law of the United States, the BCIS will prepare a report to try to revoke the approval of the request for an orphan. When the applicant receives such a notice, he or she have an opportunity to provide evidence in order not to revoke the approval.If we knew that the child has an illness or disability that has not been mentioned in the petition the BCIS or the embassy or consulate, depending on the location of the request for an orphan, they will provide to the petitioner and his spouse, if they are married Details of the medical condition. The petitioner and her spouse, if they are married, to decide if they still want the child to enter the United States as an immigrant.

If the prospective adoptive parents choose the child to enter the United States, parents should be warned that the child is still admissible in the United States. Some diseases cause the child to be inadmissible. For example, if a child has a contagious disease, the child may be inadmissible. If we apply the margins of inadmissibility, they notify parents about the requirements to be met before the child to legally enter the United States.

Prospective adoptive parents are advised to avoid fraudulent practices of adoption and agree with agencies or individuals involved in such activities. Just have to agree with sources recommended for children in adoption and ensure that the entire procedure is legal.

The INS has found that foreign children are often stolen for adoption in the United States. There is also a market for fraudulent documents for children who may be beneficiaries of petitions for orphans. There are unscrupulous individuals that attract customers saying that they have a faster, economical and easy to adopt children. The adoptive parents are exploited by the exorbitant amounts of money without requiring them to receive the child, or getting a sick child, or proving to be parts of fraudulent acts.

When the BCIS has reason to believe that a request for an orphan may be involved in fraudulent acts, a foreign investigation of orphan before the petition is approved. The investigation may delay the completion of the case whenever done as quickly as possible. The BCIS will make every effort to ensure that the request for an orphan is not involved in fraudulent practices of adoption. In addition, research is done as a service to adoptive parents. Protects them from any painful situation that might occur when an adoption is illegal.

Adoption and immigration

Adoption petition

Decree of adoption

The US will put more efforts into protecting haitian orphans that maybe ready for adoption

How does a Waiver worked?

Many times people cannot complete processing of their applications for the Green Card because they either have been denied or will be denied because of a prior deportation, criminal act or misrepresentation.

A waiver is a package that is sent to the appropriate United States government official consisting of legal arguments, declarations and exhibits. It essentially asks the government to forget (or waive) the particular ground that makes you ineligible for the Green Card. Once granted, it will allow your applications to be approved.

Immigration waiver

Waiver application

Application for waiver of ground of inadmissibility 

Nonimmigrant waiver by US Immigration Attorney

Consular Processing Procedures

Consular Processing is the procedure whereby you go to the appropriate United States Consulate to get your applications processed for either your Lawful Permanent Residence or for a myriad of different types of work permits. 

Our law firm can prepare anyone of the numerous petitions necessary for you to enter the United States. This includes any type of immigrant or nonimmigrant petitions. Additionally, we can prepare any type of waiver for previous incidents whereby you may have been found to be inadmissible to the United States. 

Our law firm can help in another major way. One of our immigration attorneys who is familiar with consular practice can accompany you to the interview and help with every aspect of the interview. This will give you the maximum chance of success.

Consular processing

Conditional LPR

Legal permanent resident 

Family petitions to immigrate family members 

 

 

 

 

REAL ID ACT Updates and Asylum

The June 2009 Immigration Briefings, entitled “Credibility, Burden of Proof, and Corroboration Under the Real ID Act,” 09-06 Immigration Briefing 1 (June 2009), discusses credibility determinations as prescribed by the REAL ID Act of 2005, primarily in the context of asylum relief. The Briefing addresses both burden of proof and corroboration as part of its analysis of credibility under the REAL ID Act. The Briefing begins with a historical background of the REAL ID Act and continues by examining burden-of-proof issues. The Briefing provides an analysis of the standard requirement under the REAL ID Act that aliens applying for relief demonstrate that harm on account of a protected ground be at least one central reason for feared persecution as compared with the pre-REAL ID Act mixed-motive standard. Also discussed in the Briefing are the REAL ID Act credibility amendments, which require that factfinders consider the totality of circumstances when considering credibility as applied to minor inconsistencies in testimony and the heart of the applicant’s claim. Finally, the Briefing discusses language in the REAL ID Act that gives immigration judges the right to demand that an alien produce evidence to corroborate otherwise-credible testimony unless that alien does not have the evidence and cannot reasonably obtain it.

The June Briefing was written by James Feroli, an attorney with the Immigrant and Refugee Appellate Center in Alexandria, Virginia, specializing in immigration appellate issues.
During the 108 Congress, a number of proposals related to immigration and
identification-document security were introduced, some of which were considered
in the context of implementing recommendations made by the National Commission
on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States (also known as the 9/11 Commission)
and enacted pursuant to the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of
2004 (P.L. 108-458).  At the time that the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism
Prevention Act was adopted, some congressional leaders reportedly agreed to revisit certain immigration and document-security issues in the 109th Congress that had been dropped from the final version of the act.
The REAL ID Act of 2005 was first introduced as H.R. 418 by Representative
James Sensenbrenner on January 26, 2005, and passed the House, as amended, on
February 10, 2005.  The text of House-passed H.R. 418 was subsequently added to
H.R. 1268, the Emergency Supplemental Appropriations Act for Defense, the Global
War on Terror, and Tsunami Relief, 2005, which was introduced by Representative
Jerry Lewis on March 11, 2005, and passed the House, as amended, on March 16,
2005.  H.R. 1268 passed the Senate on April 21, 2005, as amended, on a vote of 99-
0, but did not include the REAL ID Act provisions.  A conference report resolving
differences between the two versions of the bill, H.Rept. 109-72, passed the House
on May 5, 2005 and the Senate on May 10, 2005, before being enacted into law on
May 11, 2005. The version of the REAL ID Act (P.L. 109-13, Division B) ultimately
enacted includes most of the provisions of the REAL ID Act that initially passed the
House (though not those relating to the bond of aliens in removal proceedings),
though some changes were made to certain REAL ID Act provisions.
This report analyzes the major provisions of the REAL ID Act, as enacted,
which, inter alia, (1) modifies the eligibility criteria for asylum and withholding of
removal; (2) limits judicial review of certain immigration decisions; (3) provides
additional waiver authority over laws that might impede the expeditious construction of barriers and roads along land borders, including a 14-mile wide fence near San Diego; (4) expands the scope of terror-related activity making an alien inadmissible or deportable, as well as ineligible for certain forms of relief from removal; (5) requires states to meet certain minimum security standards in order for the drivers’ licenses and personal identification cards they issue to be accepted for federal purposes; (6) requires the Secretary of Homeland Security to enter into the appropriate aviation security screening database the appropriate background
information of any person convicted of using a false driver’s license for the purpose
of boarding an airplane; and (7) requires the Department of Homeland Security to
study and plan ways to improve U.S. security and improve inter-agency
communications and information sharing, as well as establish a ground surveillance
pilot program.

REAL ID ACT Updates

The June 2009 Immigration Briefings, entitled “Credibility, Burden of Proof, and Corroboration Under the Real ID Act,” 09-06 Immigration Briefing 1 (June 2009), discusses credibility determinations as prescribed by the REAL ID Act of 2005, primarily in the context of asylum relief. The Briefing addresses both burden of proof and corroboration as part of its analysis of credibility under the REAL ID Act. The Briefing begins with a historical background of the REAL ID Act and continues by examining burden-of-proof issues. The Briefing provides an analysis of the standard requirement under the REAL ID Act that aliens applying for relief demonstrate that harm on account of a protected ground be at least one central reason for feared persecution as compared with the pre-REAL ID Act mixed-motive standard. Also discussed in the Briefing are the REAL ID Act credibility amendments, which require that factfinders consider the totality of circumstances when considering credibility as applied to minor inconsistencies in testimony and the heart of the applicant’s claim. Finally, the Briefing discusses language in the REAL ID Act that gives immigration judges the right to demand that an alien produce evidence to corroborate otherwise-credible testimony unless that alien does not have the evidence and cannot reasonably obtain it.

The June Briefing was written by James Feroli, an attorney with the Immigrant and Refugee Appellate Center in Alexandria, Virginia, specializing in immigration appellate issues.
During the 108 Congress, a number of proposals related to immigration and
identification-document security were introduced, some of which were considered
in the context of implementing recommendations made by the National Commission
on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States (also known as the 9/11 Commission)
and enacted pursuant to the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of
2004 (P.L. 108-458).  At the time that the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism
Prevention Act was adopted, some congressional leaders reportedly agreed to revisit certain immigration and document-security issues in the 109th Congress that had been dropped from the final version of the act.
The REAL ID Act of 2005 was first introduced as H.R. 418 by Representative
James Sensenbrenner on January 26, 2005, and passed the House, as amended, on
February 10, 2005.  The text of House-passed H.R. 418 was subsequently added to
H.R. 1268, the Emergency Supplemental Appropriations Act for Defense, the Global
War on Terror, and Tsunami Relief, 2005, which was introduced by Representative
Jerry Lewis on March 11, 2005, and passed the House, as amended, on March 16,
2005.  H.R. 1268 passed the Senate on April 21, 2005, as amended, on a vote of 99-
0, but did not include the REAL ID Act provisions.  A conference report resolving
differences between the two versions of the bill, H.Rept. 109-72, passed the House
on May 5, 2005 and the Senate on May 10, 2005, before being enacted into law on
May 11, 2005. The version of the REAL ID Act (P.L. 109-13, Division B) ultimately
enacted includes most of the provisions of the REAL ID Act that initially passed the
House (though not those relating to the bond of aliens in removal proceedings),
though some changes were made to certain REAL ID Act provisions.
This report analyzes the major provisions of the REAL ID Act, as enacted,
which, inter alia, (1) modifies the eligibility criteria for asylum and withholding of
removal; (2) limits judicial review of certain immigration decisions; (3) provides
additional waiver authority over laws that might impede the expeditious construction of barriers and roads along land borders, including a 14-mile wide fence near San Diego; (4) expands the scope of terror-related activity making an alien inadmissible or deportable, as well as ineligible for certain forms of relief from removal; (5) requires states to meet certain minimum security standards in order for the drivers’ licenses and personal identification cards they issue to be accepted for federal purposes; (6) requires the Secretary of Homeland Security to enter into the appropriate aviation security screening database the appropriate background
information of any person convicted of using a false driver’s license for the purpose
of boarding an airplane; and (7) requires the Department of Homeland Security to
study and plan ways to improve U.S. security and improve inter-agency
communications and information sharing, as well as establish a ground surveillance
pilot program.