Posted on August 2, 2010 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney
ICE FY 2007 – 2010 removal statistics as of 7/22/10 including total removals, non-criminal removals, convicted criminal removals, average length of stay and average daily population in ICE custody
Removal purposes
Removal order
Removal proceedings
Removal attorney
33.767524
-118.189993
Filed under: Removal statistics | Tagged: ICE, Immigration, Immigration Attorney, Immigration Lawyer, reinstated removal order, removability, Removal, Removal or Deportation Hearings, removal order, removal orders, Removal Proceedings, Removal Statistics, USCIS | Leave a comment »
Posted on August 2, 2010 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney
ICE news release on the sentences of nine people who pleaded guilty to charges connected with their involvement in a scheme in central Ohio to arrange fraudulent marriages between foreign nationals and U.S. citizens.
33.767524
-118.189993
Filed under: Central Ohio, ICE, Immigration Attorney, Immigration Lawyer, Marriage Fraud Scheme | Tagged: ICE, Immigration Attorney, Immigration Lawyer, Marriage Fraud Scheme, USCIS | Leave a comment »
Posted on August 2, 2010 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney
For purposes of establishing adjustment of status eligibility under INA §245(a), an alien seeking to show that he or she has been “admitted” to the U.S., need only prove procedural regularity in his or her entry. 25 I&N Dec. 285 (BIA 2010).
33.767524
-118.189993
Filed under: Adjustment of Status, Immigration Attorney, Immigration Lawyer, INA §245(a), USCIS | Tagged: Adjustment of Status, Immigration Attorney, Immigration Lawyer, INA §245(a), USCIS | Leave a comment »
Posted on August 2, 2010 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney
The court held that a vacated conviction that was based on a guilty plea combined with hearsay statements from police reports did not provide enough reason to believe that the petitioner trafficked in a controlled substance.
33.767524
-118.189993
Filed under: Drug Trafficker, Immigration Attorney, Immigration Lawyer, Petitioner, USCIS | Tagged: Drug Trafficker, Immigration Attorney, Immigration Lawyer, Petitioner, USCIS | Leave a comment »
Posted on August 2, 2010 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney
DHS press release announcing the production of the first Enhanced Tribal Card (ETC) with the Pascua Yaqui Tribe, a WHTI-compliant document that recognizes tribal membership and U.S. citizenship for the purpose of entering the U.S. through a land or sea port of entry.
33.767524
-118.189993
Filed under: Department of Homeland Security (DHS), Enhanced Tribal Card (ETC), Immigration Attorney, Immigration Lawyer, USCIS | Tagged: Department of Homeland Security (DHS), Enhanced Tribal Card (ETC), Immigration Attorney, Immigration Lawyer, USCIS | Leave a comment »
Posted on August 2, 2010 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney
DHS press release announcing the production of the first Enhanced Tribal Card (ETC) with the Pascua Yaqui Tribe, a WHTI-compliant document that recognizes tribal membership and U.S. citizenship for the purpose of entering the U.S. through a land or sea port of entry
Department of Homeland Security
DHS and DOS
DHS appeal
DHS officially issues statement on public charge rule
33.767524
-118.189993
Filed under: Department of Homeland Security (DHS) | Tagged: Department of Homeland Security (DHS), Enhanced Tribal Card (ETC), Immigration Attorney, Immigration Lawyer, USCIS | Leave a comment »
Posted on July 29, 2010 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney
CA9 found petitioners eligible for §212(k) relief, concluding that their immigrant visas, which were derivative of their mother’s fraudulently-obtained LPR status, fell with the scope of §212(k).
Who is eligible for 212(k)?
212 (k) petitioners
Immigration attorney
CA9
33.767524
-118.189993
Filed under: 212(k) relief | Tagged: 212(k) relief, Immigration Attorney, Immigration Lawyer, LPR, USCIS | Leave a comment »
Posted on July 26, 2010 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney
In a 6/17/09 decision,
Administrative Appeals Office (
AAO) dismissed waiver application as moot, finding applicant’s admission of prior drug use to a psychiatrist insufficient for inadmissibility finding. AAO addresses Section 428 of the Homeland Security Act of 2002.
33.767524
-118.189993
Filed under: Administrative Appeals Office (AAO), Immigration Attorney, Immigration Lawyer, USCIS, waiver | Tagged: Administrative Appeals Office ( AAO), Immigration Attorney, Immigration Lawyer, USCIS, waiver | Leave a comment »
Posted on July 26, 2010 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney
In a 6/17/09 decision, Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) dismissed waiver application as moot, finding applicant’s admission of prior drug use to a psychiatrist insufficient for inadmissibility finding. AAO addresses Section 428 of the Homeland Security Act of 2002.
AAO
Administrative Appeals Officec
Administrative Appeals Office meaning
AAO finds occupation of “Market research analyst”
33.767524
-118.189993
Filed under: Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) | Tagged: Administrative Appeals Office ( AAO), Immigration Attorney, Immigration Lawyer, USCIS, waiver | Leave a comment »
Posted on July 26, 2010 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney
On 7/15/10, USCIS published a 30-day notice extending use of Form N-644. However, USCIS should have published a 30-day notice on a revision to the Form N-644, not an extension.
Immigration lawyer
Form N-644
Looking for an Immigration attorney?
Law Offices of Brian D. Lerner
33.767524
-118.189993
Filed under: Form N-644 | Tagged: Citizenship, Form N-644, Immigration Attorney, Immigration Lawyer, USCIS | Leave a comment »