• Hours & Info

    (562) 495-0554
    M-F: 8:00am - 6:00 p.m.
    Sat: 9:00 a.m. - 12:00 p.m.
  • Past Blog Posts

  • https://api.whatsapp.com/send?phone=13104885414

Associated Press: U.S. Citizen Born in Refugee Camp Sues to Marry

The Associated Press reports that a 31-year-old U.S. citizen who was born in an Indonesian refugee camp filed a lawsuit in federal court on Tuesday to challenge a newly amended Louisiana law that blocked him from obtaining a marriage license because he couldn’t produce a birth certificate. The law requires any foreign-born person wanting to get married in Louisiana to produce both a birth certificate and an unexpired visa or a passport from their country of birth. The suit alleges that the law violates the plaintiff’s constitutional rights and was intended to discriminate against foreign-born individuals.

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/bona-fide-marriage-2/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/defense-of-marriage-act-supreme-court/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/immigration-marriage/

https://californiaimmigration.us/marriage-based-visa-denial-proceedure/

AG Lifts Stay and Remands Matter of Chairez and Matter of Sama

After referring Matter of Chairez and Matter of Sama to herself for review of an issue relating to Descamps v. United States, and after inviting amicus briefs addressing the proper approach for determining “divisibility” within the meaning of Descamps, the Attorney General (AG) lifted the stay and remanded the two cases to the BIA for any appropriate action in light of the U.S. Supreme Court’s June 23, 2016, decision in Mathis v. United States.

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/bia-2/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/bia/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/bia/

https://californiaimmigration.us/bia-deference-given-to-particulary-serious-crime/

BIA Says IJs Cannot Adjudicate Section 212(d)(3)(A)(ii) Waiver by Petitioner for U Status

In a precedent decision issued today, the BIA held that IJs lack the authority to adjudicate a request for a waiver of inadmissibility under INA §212(d)(3)(A)(ii) by a petitioner for U nonimmigrant status. The BIA also concluded that the Seventh Circuit’s decision in L.D.G. v. Holder did not expressly find the language of §212(d)(3)(A) to be unambiguous, which would have left no room for agency discretion. Accordingly, the BIA will apply its ruling in this decision to cases nationwide, including cases arising in the Seventh Circuit.

https://californiaimmigration.us/nonimmigrant-waiver-by-u-s-immigration-attorney/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/fee-waiver/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/immigration-waiver/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/new-waiver/

USCIS Updates the H-2B Cap Count

As of May 2, 2016, USCIS had receipted 32,620 beneficiaries towards the 33,000 cap for the second half of FY2016. This count includes 26,426 approved and 6,194 pending beneficiaries.

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/h-2b/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/h-2b-cap/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/h-2b-petitions/

https://californiaimmigration.us/visas/h-2b-temporary-worker/

Court Finds Receipt of Embezzled Property Is Not Categorically an Aggravated Felony

The Fourth Circuit held that the BIA erred in concluding that the petitioner was an aggravated felon who was ineligible for cancellation of removal under INA §240A(a)(3), finding that a conviction for receipt of embezzled property under 18 USC §659 is not an aggravated felony under the categorical approach

https://californiaimmigration.us/california-penal-code-regarding-unlawful-sexual-intercourse-with-a-minor-compares-the-similar-charges-of-aggravated-felony/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/aggrvated-felony/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/aggravated-felony/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/felony/

Circuit Court Finds Exceptional Circumstances Exist to Reopen Petitioner’s Removal Proceedings

The First Circuit concluded that the BIA abused its discretion when it found that the circumstances attendant to the entry of an in absentia removal order against a young undocumented immigrant who was ill-served by two attorneys were not exceptional. Accordingly, the court remanded to the BIA with instructions to set aside the in absentia removal order and reopen the petitioner’s removal proceedings.

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/expedited-removal/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/removal/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/removal-of-the-conditional-residence/

https://californiaimmigration.us/removal/

USCIS Message: Current Form I-9 Valid Until January 21, 2017

I-9 form has changed for employers, but you can continue to use the old I-9 form for a few more months before the new form is in effect.

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/form-i-9/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/form-i-9-employment-eligibility-verification-2/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/i-9/

https://californiaimmigration.us/a-los-angeles-immigration-attorney-can-help-with-all-your-immigration-needs/

BALCA Finds PERM Received Two Days After Recruitment Expired Was Timely Submitted

Where recruitment expired on a Saturday but the PERM application filed by mail was not received until Monday, BALCA overturned the Certifying Officer’s denial of the labor certification, finding that sufficient documentation was submitted to prove the date of mailing, and thus that the PERM application was timely filed.

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/balca/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/balca-denial/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/balca-remanded-the-case-for-certification/

https://californiaimmigration.us/balca-affirms-denial-based-on-lack-of-proof-of-job-order/

DHS Adds New TRIG Exemptions

DHS Secretary Jeh Johnson authorized new terrorism-related inadmissibility grounds (TRIG) exemptions covering a number of groups.

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/dhs/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/acting-dhs-secretary/

https://californiaimmigration.us/central-american-minor-kids-program-opened/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/department-of-homeland-security-dhs/

Family detention

The Ninth Circuit held that the Flores settlement agreement applies to both minors who are accompanied and unaccompanied by their parents, and that the lower court correctly refused to amend the agreement to accommodate family detention. The court also found that the lower court erred in interpreting the agreement to provide an affirmative right to release for accompanying parents, but did not preclude such release, and explicitly made no determination about whether DHS is making otherwise appropriate and individualized release determinations for parents.

Family detention

Detention

Detained?

Stay in the U.S with your family