AOS granted for Client with petty theft arrest, who did not disclose conviction on application nor to our office.
Petitioner ineligible for AOS for presenting US birth certificate and continuous physical presence
Filed under: Adjustment of Status | Tagged: Brian D. Lerner, brian lerner, california immigration attorney, Immigration Attorney, Immigration Lawyer, immigration win, Law Offices of Brian D. Lerner, win | Leave a comment »
AOS granted for Client that was waived through. Very little proof other than declaration from father, Client was a minor at the time.
Filed under: Immigration Attorney | Tagged: Brian D. Lerner, brian lerner, california immigration attorney, Immigration Attorney, Immigration Lawyer, immigration win, Law Offices of Brian D. Lerner, win | Leave a comment »
AOS granted for Client that was waived through. Very little proof other than declaration from father, Client was a minor at the time.
Filed under: Adjustment of Status | Tagged: Brian D. Lerner, brian lerner, california immigration attorney, Immigration Attorney, Immigration Lawyer, immigration win, Law Offices of Brian D. Lerner, win | Leave a comment »
Proceedings terminated based on governor’s pardon despite DHS opposition. Client was an LPR and order removed based on a theft offense and then granted withholding of removal. We prepared pardon which was approved and moved to reopen based on Client’s marriage to a USC. Once reopened, we moved to terminate as the sole ground of removability no longer existed. Judge agreed, terminated case and reinstated Client’s LPR status.
Filed under: Immigration Attorney | Tagged: Brian D. Lerner, brian lerner, california immigration attorney, Immigration Attorney, Immigration Lawyer, immigration win, Law Offices of Brian D. Lerner, win | 2 Comments »
Joint motion to terminate, DHS could not establish removability Client was an LPR and had a theft conviction and a solicitation for sale (crack) conviction. DHS could not establish removability based on a controlled substance violation or 2 CIMTs.
Filed under: Removal Proceedings | Tagged: Brian D. Lerner, brian lerner, california immigration attorney, Immigration Attorney, Immigration Lawyer, immigration win, Law Offices of Brian D. Lerner, win | Leave a comment »
Proceedings terminated based on approved I-130 even though Client had a previous VD order.
How much time do I have to wait to get my first interview for application I-130?
Filed under: I-130 | Tagged: Brian D. Lerner, brian lerner, california immigration attorney, Immigration Attorney, Immigration Lawyer, immigration win, Law Offices of Brian D. Lerner, win | Leave a comment »
Proceedings terminated based on approved I-130 even though Client had a previous VD order.
Filed under: Immigration Attorney | Tagged: Brian D. Lerner, brian lerner, california immigration attorney, Immigration Attorney, Immigration Lawyer, immigration win, Law Offices of Brian D. Lerner, win | Leave a comment »
Cancellation of Removal (42A) granted by IJ . Client had 2 DUIs, a reckless driving and a discharge of a firearm in gross negligence. Firearm offense would have stopped time if it was a CIMT. Established through testimony that it was not a CIMT and Judge granted case. Client had a long work history and one minor child but not too many other equities.
Cancellation of removal meaning
Filed under: Cancellation of Removal | Tagged: Brian D. Lerner, brian lerner, california immigration attorney, Immigration Attorney, Immigration Lawyer, immigration win, Law Offices of Brian D. Lerner, win | Leave a comment »
Cancellation of Removal (42A) granted by IJ . Client had 2 DUIs, a reckless driving and a discharge of a firearm in gross negligence. Firearm offense would have stopped time if it was a CIMT. Established through testimony that it was not a CIMT and Judge granted case. Client had a long work history and one minor child but not too many other equities.
Filed under: Immigration Attorney | Tagged: Brian D. Lerner, brian lerner, california immigration attorney, Immigration Attorney, Immigration Lawyer, immigration win, Law Offices of Brian D. Lerner, win | Leave a comment »
In absentia MTR granted by IJ Fong. NTA was sent to Client’s address listed on his I-589 more than 4 years after he applied for asylum but he was no longer living at that address. Motion granted based on Client’s declaration, daughter’s declaration and utility bills showing a change of address. According to IJ Order, the NTA and Notice of Hearing were also “returned to sender.”
Filed under: asylum | Tagged: asylee, asylum, Asylum Applicants, Asylum Application, asylum attorney, asylum officer, Brian D. Lerner, brian lerner, california immigration attorney, Immigration Attorney, Immigration Lawyer, immigration win, Law Offices of Brian D. Lerner, win | Leave a comment »
Immigration Lawyer
Brian D. Lerner Immigration Attorney & Deportation Lawyer Blog 