• Hours & Info

    (562) 495-0554
    M-F: 8:00am - 6:00 p.m.
    Sat: 9:00 a.m. - 12:00 p.m.
  • Past Blog Posts

  • https://api.whatsapp.com/send?phone=13104885414

BIA Says Arizona Felony Conviction for Solicitation to Possess Marijuana for Sale Is a CIMT

In a precedent decision issued today, the BIA clarified Matter of Vo, holding that, within the jurisdiction of the Ninth Circuit, a returning lawful permanent resident (LPR) who has a felony conviction for solicitation to possess marijuana for sale is an arriving alien who is inadmissible under INA §212(a)(2)(A)(i)(I) for having committed a crime of moral turpitude (CIMT), even though that section of the INA refers only to attempt and conspiracy to commit a CIMT.
BIA deference given to particulary serious crime

BIA Says Endangering the Welfare of a Child in New York Is Categorically a Crime of Child Abuse

In a precedent decision issued today, the BIA held that the crime of endangering the welfare of a child in violation of §260.10(1) of the New York Penal Law, which requires knowingly acting in a manner likely to be injurious to the physical, mental, or moral welfare of a child, is categorically a “crime of child abuse, child neglect, or child abandonment” under INA §237(a)(2)(E)(i).

Board of immigration appeals

Appeal to BIA

BIA and immigration

BIA deference given to particulary serious crime

AG Lifts Stay and Remands Matter of Chairez and Matter of Sama

After referring Matter of Chairez and Matter of Sama to herself for review of an issue relating to Descamps v. United States, and after inviting amicus briefs addressing the proper approach for determining “divisibility” within the meaning of Descamps, the Attorney General (AG) lifted the stay and remanded the two cases to the BIA for any appropriate action in light of the U.S. Supreme Court’s June 23, 2016, decision in Mathis v. United States.

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/bia-2/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/bia/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/bia/

https://californiaimmigration.us/bia-deference-given-to-particulary-serious-crime/

Court Finds Receipt of Embezzled Property Is Not Categorically an Aggravated Felony

The Fourth Circuit held that the BIA erred in concluding that the petitioner was an aggravated felon who was ineligible for cancellation of removal under INA §240A(a)(3), finding that a conviction for receipt of embezzled property under 18 USC §659 is not an aggravated felony under the categorical approach

https://californiaimmigration.us/california-penal-code-regarding-unlawful-sexual-intercourse-with-a-minor-compares-the-similar-charges-of-aggravated-felony/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/aggrvated-felony/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/aggravated-felony/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/felony/

Court Says No Rational Basis Between Chronic Alcoholism and a Lack of Good Moral Character

The Ninth Circuit granted the petition for review of the BIA decision, finding the petitioner ineligible for cancellation of removal or voluntary departure because he lacked good moral character as a “habitual drunkard.” The court remanded, holding that the petitioner could bring an equal protection challenge because there is no rational basis to classify persons afflicted by chronic alcoholism as innately lacking good moral character.

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/9th-circuit/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/9th-circuit-court-of-appeals/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/petition-for-review-to-9th-circuit-court-of-appeal/

https://californiaimmigration.us/9th-circuit-case-gran/

Circuit Court Finds Exceptional Circumstances Exist to Reopen Petitioner’s Removal Proceedings

The First Circuit concluded that the BIA abused its discretion when it found that the circumstances attendant to the entry of an in absentia removal order against a young undocumented immigrant who was ill-served by two attorneys were not exceptional. Accordingly, the court remanded to the BIA with instructions to set aside the in absentia removal order and reopen the petitioner’s removal proceedings.

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/expedited-removal/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/removal/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/removal-of-the-conditional-residence/

https://californiaimmigration.us/removal/

BIA Rules on Requirements to Adjust Status Under the Legalization Provisions of INA §245A

In a precedent decision issued today, the BIA held that a noncitizen seeking to acquire lawful permanent resident status through the legalization provisions of INA §245A must establish admissibility at the time of adjustment of status under §245A(b)(1). The BIA also held that a noncitizen who was inadmissible at the time of adjustment of status from temporary resident to permanent resident under INA §245A(b)(1) was not lawfully admitted for permanent residence, and is therefore ineligible for a waiver of inadmissibility under former INA §212(c).

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/ina-%c2%a7245a/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/245a/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/adjustment-of-status/

https://californiaimmigration.us/adjustment-granted-in-court-after-4-years-of-waiting/

BIA Determines Evidentiary Value of Direct Sibling-to-Sibling DNA Test Results

In a precedent decision issued today, the BIA held that direct sibling-to-sibling DNA test results reflecting a 99.5 percent degree of certainty or higher that a full sibling biological relationship exists should be accepted and considered to be probative evidence of the relationship.

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/dna-testing/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/dna/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/family-relationship/

https://californiaimmigration.us/visas/u-1-visa-for-victims-of-crime/

The Court Says Petitioner Failed to Show That His Conviction Was Not Vacated for Immigration Purposes

The Eighth Circuit upheld the BIA’s finding that the petitioner failed to meet his burden of proving that his state court conviction for theft in the fourth degree, a crime involving moral turpitude, was vacated for a substantive or procedural reason and not for immigration purposes. The court also found that the IJ did not err when it pretermitted petitioner’s application for cancellation of removal on the grounds that he was convicted of a crime of moral turpitude, even though he was never admitted to the United States.

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/conviction/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/drug-conviction/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/aliens-conviction/

https://californiaimmigration.us/los-angeles-deportation-law-firm/relief-from-conflicts/

Court Upholds Denial of Adjustment Application Where Marriage Was Not Deemed Bona Fide

The Seventh Circuit denied the petition for review, finding that substantial evidence supported the IJ’s finding that the petitioner committed marriage fraud, and thus, that he was ineligible for adjustment of status under INA §212(a)(6)(C)(i). The court also found that the IJ did not commit any legal or constitutional error in exercising discretion to deny adjustment of status.

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/212a6/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/aos/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/petitioner-ineligible-for-aos-for-presenting-us-birth-certificate-and-continuous-physical-presenc/

https://californiaimmigration.us/political-asylum/present-case/