• Hours & Info

    (562) 495-0554
    M-F: 8:00am - 6:00 p.m.
    Sat: 9:00 a.m. - 12:00 p.m.
  • Past Blog Posts

  • https://api.whatsapp.com/send?phone=13104885414

The new Supreme Court case rules that the BIA rule under 212(c) is arbitrary and capricious

Video: The new Supreme Court case rules that the BIA rule under 212(c) is arbitrary and capricious – Avvo.com http://ping.fm/Z5966

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/bia/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/bia-board-of-immigration-appeals/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/bia-board-of-immigration-appeals/

https://californiaimmigration.us/bia-rules-on-step-child/

BIA Finds NTA Without Hearing Date Triggers “Stop-Time” Rule

The Board found that any period of continuous residence or continuous physical presence ends upon service of an NTA on the alien, even if the NTA does not include the date and time of the initial hearing.

https://atomic-temporary-10880024.wpcomstaging.com/tag/bia-2/

https://atomic-temporary-10880024.wpcomstaging.com/tag/bia-3/

https://atomic-temporary-10880024.wpcomstaging.com/tag/appeal-to-bia/

https://californiaimmigration.us/bia-deference-given-to-particulary-serious-crime/

BIA Says Adjustment under Cuban Refugee Adjustment Act Is an Admission

The Board found the respondent was admitted to the U.S. when he adjusted status under the Cuban Adjustment Act, and was thus subject to removal under INA § 237(a) following a drug trafficking conviction.

https://atomic-temporary-10880024.wpcomstaging.com/tag/bia-2/

https://atomic-temporary-10880024.wpcomstaging.com/tag/bia/

https://atomic-temporary-10880024.wpcomstaging.com/wp-admin/term.php?taxonomy=post_tag&tag_ID=363145778&post_type=post&wp_http_referer=%2Fwp-admin%2Fedit-tags.php%3Ftaxonomy%3Dpost_tag%26post_type%3Dpost%26s%3DBIA

https://californiaimmigration.us/bia-deference-given-to-particulary-serious-crime/

CA5 on Requiring Corroborating Evidence from Asylum Applicants

The court held that the BIA reasonably interpreted its own regulations in Matter of S-M-J- when ruling asylum applicants can be required to provide reasonably obtainable corroborating evidence even when their testimony is credible.

Supreme Court Rejects §212(c) Comparable Grounds Rule

In a unanimous opinion, the Court held that the BIA’s comparable grounds rule, as applied to applications for §212(c) relief in deportation proceedings, is arbitrary and capricious under the Administrative Procedure Act.

BIA Applies Stop-Time Rule Where NTA Did Not Include Hearing Date/Time

The BIA held that the continuous residence/presence of an alien applying for cancellation ends under the stop-time rule upon service of an NTA, even if the NTA does not include the date and time of the initial hearing.

BIA on Burden of Proof and Returning LPRs

The BIA held that to establish that a returning LPR is to be treated as an applicant for admission, the government has the burden of proving by clear and convincing evidence that a §101(a)(13)(C) exceptions applies.

CA4 on Jurisdiction over BIA Remand for Voluntary Departure

The court found jurisdiction to review the BIA’s order remanding for a grant of voluntary departure, but prudentially declined to exercise jurisdiction in light of Dada and 8 CFR §1240.26(b)(1)(i)(D).

BIA Remands Mali FGM Asylum Claim

The BIA found exceptional circumstances to permit respondent’s late-filed asylum application, reversed the IJ’s finding that DHS rebutted the well-founded fear presumption, and found that the IJ failed to follow Matter of A-T-.

Petitioner could present the error to the BIA

The court found that a translation error in a medical document corroborating Petitioner’s injuries contributed significantly to the IJ’s adverse credibility finding, and stayed the appeal so that Petitioner could present the error to the BIA.

BIA

Board of immigration appeals

Appeal to BIA

BIA decisions