• Hours & Info

    (562) 495-0554
    M-F: 8:00am - 6:00 p.m.
    Sat: 9:00 a.m. - 12:00 p.m.
  • Past Blog Posts

  • https://api.whatsapp.com/send?phone=13104885414

Green card application granted for client who is married to a US citizen but had a deportation order from 1995.  Client had two motions to reopen denied by the Immigration Court and his appeal was denied by the BIA.  However, once at the 9th Circuit Court of Appeal, the Department of Homeland Security agreed remand and terminate his case so that he could apply for adjustment of status with USCIS.  20 years later, he is now a lawful permanent resident of the United States.

BIA appeal

Appeals

AOS petition

Do a petition

 

 

 

In a precedent decision issued today, the BIA held that a respondent who adjusted status inside the U.S., and who did not enter as an LPR, is not barred from establishing eligibility for a waiver of inadmissibility under INA §212(h). In so doing, the BIA withdrew from its previous decisions on the topic, aligning its holding with that of nine circuit courts who have held that the plain language of §212(h) precludes immigrants from establishing eligibility for relief only if they lawfully entered the U.S. as permanent residents and thereafter committed a removable offense for which a waiver is required.

Appeal to BIA

BIA

Board of immigration appeals

Bia deference given to particulary serious crime

BIA Finds LPR Who Adjusts Status in U.S. Is Not Barred from §212(h) Waiver

In a precedent decision issued today, the BIA held that a respondent who adjusted status inside the U.S., and who did not enter as an LPR, is not barred from establishing eligibility for a waiver of inadmissibility under INA §212(h). In so doing, the BIA withdrew from its previous decisions on the topic, aligning its holding with that of nine circuit courts who have held that the plain language of §212(h) precludes immigrants from establishing eligibility for relief only if they lawfully entered the U.S. as permanent residents and thereafter committed a removable offense for which a waiver is required.

District Court Adopts CA6 Flores Holding Regarding TPS and Adjustment of Status

The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania held that a TPS beneficiary who is eligible for an immigrant visa and has an immigrant visa immediately available to him is eligible for adjustment of status under INA §245(a), notwithstanding having originally entered the U.S. without inspection.

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/adjustment-of-status/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/conditional-parolee-not-eligible-for-adjustment-of-status/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/best-immigration-attorney/

https://californiaimmigration.us/adjustment-of-status/

(AOS)

The BIA held that adjustment of status (AOS) to lawful permanent residence constitutes an admission for purposes of deciding removability under §237(a)(2)(A)(iii), and that the crime of sodomy by force in violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice is an aggravated felony.

AOS

Adjustment of status

Conditional parole not eligible for adjustment of status

AOS based on K3 granted

Another recent immigration win. AOS and 212 (h)

Another recent immigration win. AOS and 212(h) case granted by IJ Tabaddor. DHS waived appeal. Represented client throughout removal process; from when she was detained by ICE and placed in proceedings until she was granted permanent residency. Client was initially charged with inadmissibilty but later with removability once we submitted proof of her lawful entry. Client married her USC husband while in proceedings and we prepared and filed the I-130 which was approved after an RFE. She had several theft convictions, the most recent in 2009 with a 16 month sentence. Client and her co-sponsor testified in support of her applications. Court determined that testimony of husband and children and other witness was not necessary. http://ow.ly/sEOaU

AOS meaning

Petitioner ineligible for AOS

USCIS inventory of employment based for presenting US birth certificare and continuos physical presence

Adjustment granted in court

 

 

 

 

Another win for the Law Offices of Brian D. Lerner

17-year-old in absentia order reopened for lack of notice. Client is eligible for Adjustment of Status.

Adjustment of status

Conditional parolee not eligible for adjustment of status

AOS process

AOS application

 

 

 

New Win for the Law Offices of Brian D. Lerner

Adjustment of Status based on Marriage was approved for client who entered legally but has several juvenile crimes. No Waivers or Court needed.

Adjustment of status meaning

Conditional parolee not eligible for adjustment of status

AOS

AOS and immigration

Another Win for the Law Offices of Brian D. Lerner

AOS approved for Client who is from Mexico, is married to a USC and they have 6 children (including quintuplets). Client left the United States 2004/2005 and they’re 10 year bar waiver was denied (they didn’t have an attorney) or children at the time. He re entered the U.S. and then left in 2010 because he had no identification and wanted to avoid any issues with Immigration. Our office was retained for a humanitarian parole in 2011 based on one of their children being very very sick. His parole was approved and his I-94 indicated “Paroled in for AOS.” His case was approved today with no issues.

USCIS Inventory of employment based AOS cases pending at the service centers and field officers

Petitioner ineligible for AOS 

AOS meaning

Law Offices of Brian D. Lerner, APC

Another win for the Law Offices of Brian D. Lerner

AOS (I-130 and I-485) granted for couple married for about 1 year, with no children and very very little joint documents.

Green card

Getting the Green card through marriage

I-130 meaning

I-130 questions and answers