• Hours & Info

    (562) 495-0554
    M-F: 8:00am - 6:00 p.m.
    Sat: 9:00 a.m. - 12:00 p.m.
  • Past Blog Posts

  • https://api.whatsapp.com/send?phone=13104885414

Jurisdiction to review the BIA’s decision on a Motion to Reopen

The court reaffirmed Fernandez v. Gonzalez, finding jurisdiction to review the BIA’s decision on a motion to reopen that presents evidence so distinct from that considered previously as to make the motion a request for new relief. (Garcia v. Holder, 9/1/10)

Jurisdiction to review the BIA’s decision on a Motion to Reopen

The court reaffirmed Fernandez v. Gonzalez, finding jurisdiction to review the BIA’s decision on a motion to reopen that presents evidence so distinct from that considered previously as to make the motion a request for new relief. (Garcia v. Holder, 9/1/10)

Aggravated Felony of “sexual abuse of a minor”

The court held that a conviction under N.J. State Ann. §2C:14-3(a) constituted the aggravated felony of “sexual abuse of a minor” under INA §101(a)(43) and that removal proceedings are not time-barred. (Restrepo v. Atty’ General of the U.S., 8/16/10)

Court remanded the Asylum case of a Falun Gong Practitioner

The court remanded the asylum case of a Falun Gong practitioner, finding that the evidence established that the petitioner was subject to a well-founded fear of persecution on return to China. (Qiu v. Holder, 7/12/10)

Concern on Counsel’s part to meet multiple court deadlines

The court denied petition for review in asylum case and directed a copy of the opinion to the Wisconsin Office of Lawyer Regulation, finding a lack of evidence of diligent efforts on counsel’s part to meet multiple court deadlines. (Umezurike v. Holder, 7/9/10)

BIA interpretation in Asylum Cases

The court held that the BIA interpretation of §1003.(d)(3) in In re A-S-B- cannot stand and that an IJ’s forecasting of future events constitutes fact-finding that the BIA must review under the clearly erroneous standard. (Huang v. U.S. Att’y Gen., 9/8/10)

Grant Stay of Voluntary Departure

The court held that under 8 C.F.R. § 1240.26(i), it cannot stay a grant of voluntary departure after a petitioner seeks judicial review because the grant has already terminated. (Patel v. U.S. Att’y Gen., 8/24/10)

Conditional Green Card Holder Eligibility for §212(c) Relief

The court remanded the case for the BIA to clarify whether it considered the date that petitioner was first admitted as a conditional permanent resident in its finding that he was ineligible for §212(c) relief (Gallimore v. U.S. Att’y Gen., 8/16/10)

(TRAC) report finding that the ICE sought to remove individuals from the U.S.

Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse (TRAC) report finding that the Immigration Courts have rejected an increasing proportion of cases in which ICE sought to remove individuals from the U.S.

Provides that the alien “shall have access” to non-confidential A-file documents

The court found that INA §240(c)(2) which provides that the alien “shall have access” to non-confidential A-file documents compelled the government to provide such documents to Petitioner without requiring him to file a FOIA request. (Dent v. Holder, 11/9/10)