The court held that the BIA interpretation of §1003.(d)(3) in In re A-S-B- cannot stand and that an IJ’s forecasting of future events constitutes fact-finding that the BIA must review under the clearly erroneous standard. (Huang v. U.S. Att’y Gen., 9/8/10)
Tags:asylumBIABrian D. LernerImmigration AttorneyImmigration LawyerLaw Offices of Brian D. LernerUSCIS
Related Posts
Circuit Court Strikes Down Matter of S-O-G- & F-D-B-
The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals issued a ruling in Chavez Gonzalez v. Garland, which repealed Matter of S-O-G- & F-D-B-, holding that the Attorney…
EOIR Announces Appointment of 24 New Immigration Judges
EOIR announced the appointment of 24 new immigration judges, including four Assistant Chief Immigration Judges and two Unit Chief Immigration Judges. The memo provides a…
DHS Releases Memo on Termination of MPP
Today, DHS has announced the termination of MPP, effective immediately, after finding that the benefits of MPP are far outweighed by the costs of continuing…
Presidential Determination on Refugee Admissions for FY2022
President Biden issued a determination on October 8, setting the refugee admissions ceiling for FY2022 at 125,000. https://www.uscis.gov/humanitarian/refugees-and-asylum/refugees https://brian-d-lerner-blog.com/tag/refugee-and-asylee-follow-to-join-cases/ https://brian-d-lerner-blog.com/tag/refugee-admissions/ https://brian-d-lerner-blog.com/tag/refugee/
TPS applicants from five designated countries can now file initial applications online
USCIS announced that TPS applicants who are eligible nationals of Burma, Somalia, Syria, Venezuela or Yemen can now file Form I-821, Application for Temporary Protected…