• Hours & Info

    (562) 495-0554
    M-F: 8:00am - 6:00 p.m.
    Sat: 9:00 a.m. - 12:00 p.m.
  • Past Blog Posts

  • https://api.whatsapp.com/send?phone=13104885414

The Petty Offense Exception

Question: I committed a relatively small crime. Am I now not admissible to the U.S.?

Answer: It will depend on what exactly you committed. However, there is what is known as the petty offense exception.

Question: What is the petty offense exemption?

Answer: An alien (whether or not a minor) is not inadmissible if the CIMT is for a petty offense. A conviction (or admission) is considered a petty offense: “if the maximum penalty possible for the crime of which the alien was convicted … did not exceed imprisonment for one year and, if the alien was convicted of such crime, the alien was not sentenced to a term of imprisonment in excess of 6 months (regardless of the extent to which the sentence was ultimately executed).

Question: What if there is an undeterminate probationary period?

Answer: An undesignated probationary sentence, unlike an indeterminate sentence, is not considered a felony punishable by more than one year imprisonment, where the court has designated it a misdemeanor punishable by a maximum term of imprisonment of 6 months.

Question: What if the crime is a ‘wobbler’?

Answer: Cal. Penal Code §487.2 is a “wobbler” statute and where judge designates it as a misdemeanor, the BIA is bound by that determination for purposes of the petty offense exception. You need to look at each particular State.

Question: What if I had a drug conviction?

Answer: Department of State takes the position that the petty offense exception is not applicable to drug cases.

Question: What if I committed or admitted to more than 1 petty offense?

Answer: The petty offense exception is not applicable if more than one CIMT offense has been committed or admitted.

Question: What if I committed more than 1 crime, but only 1 is a CIMT?

Answer: Where there was a second CIMT, the “stop-time” rule applied because the petty offense exception only applies to the first CIMT. However, it remains effective where one of the 2 offenses was not for a CIMT. For example, an applicant who was convicted of a petty offense that was a CIMT and a second offense (battery) that was not a CIMT, he is not barred from cancellation, because he has not been convicted of an offense under §212(a)(2). It also remains effective for purposes of cancellation, where the second CIMT was not committed until after the residency requirement had accrued. The “stop-time” rule did not bar cancellation where first conviction was a petty offense and second conviction occurred after respondent accrued 7 years of continuous residence.

Question: What if I admit the facts of a particular crime?

Answer: If there was no conviction but the person admits facts, the petty offense exception applies and the alien is not inadmissible so long as the maximum sentence that could have been imposed does not exceed one year.

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/petty-offense-exception/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/cimt/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/cmt/

https://californiaimmigration.us/how-a-deportation-attorney-can-help-you-win-a-cancellation-of-removal-for-non-permanent-residents/

===========

 

Indictment of an Immigration Attorney

ICE press release announcing the indictment of an immigration attorney, Parmesh N. Dixit, of Alpharetta, Georgia, on charges of visa fraud, conspiracy, and harboring undocumented individuals for the purpose of private financial gain.

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/immigration-attorney/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/california-immigration-attorney/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/h-1b-immigration-attorney/

https://californiaimmigration.us/do-an-eb-5-investment-for-only-500000-with-a-long-beach-immigration-attorney/

Porting to a new Job?

The Second Circuit vacated the judgment of the district court and remanded, holding that USCIS is required by the INA’s portability provisions to give pre-revocation notice to the beneficiary or to the successor employer that it is revoking an I-140 petition filed by a previous employer.

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/porting/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/i140/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/derivative-beneficiary/

https://californiaimmigration.us/us-governmental-mandates-regulations-regarding-transporting-or-illegal-immigrants/

Walsh Waiver Granted – another win for Brian Lerner

I-485 approved for clients’ whose case had been pending since 2006 because of the petitioner’s criminal record.  In 2013, the case was erroneously denied by USCIS for failure to respond to a request for evidence and reopened by our office in 2014.  USCIS then attempted to revoke the petitioner’s I-130 as a result of his convictions, first through a Notice Intent to Revoke and then through an Amended Notice of Intent to Revoke.  Each time our office responded, arguing that the petitioner was eligible to petition his wife and if necessary, eligible for a waiver under the Walsh Act. 10 years later, the case was finally approved.  

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/walsh-waiver/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/adam-walsh-act/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/walsh/

https://californiaimmigration.us/walsh-waiver/

Another win for Brian D. Lerner regarding person waiting for years

Our client’s date of birth was incorrect on his naturalization certificate and passport and for years he unsuccessfully tried to correct this error with Immigration, the Department of State, the IRS and the Social Security Administration.  When our office was retained, we filed a lawsuit against Immigration in federal court to force them to amend our client’s naturalization certificate.  Within months of filing, our client received his correct certificate in the mail.

Another win for Brian D. Lerner in Immigration Court

Application for Cancellation of Removal granted for lawful permanent resident with nearly 30 years in the U.S. and a disabled daughter but with a conviction for possession of a controlled substance from 2006, an outstanding warrant for 10 years and an arrest for alien smuggling.

Got a denied I-140? Maybe it can be reversed.

The Second Circuit vacated the judgment of the district court and remanded, holding that USCIS is required by the INA’s portability provisions to give pre-revocation notice to the beneficiary or to the successor employer that it is revoking an I-140 petition filed by a previous employer.

Proposed Rules for Highly Skilled workers

DHS published in the Federal Register a notice of proposed rulemaking concerning certain employment-based immigrant and nonimmigrant visa programs for high-skilled workers. The proposed rule would codify existing agency guidance on the American Competitiveness in the Twenty-First Century Act of 2000 (AC21) and the American Competitiveness and Workforce Improvement Act of 1998 (ACWIA). The rule would also make changes intended to improve stability and job flexibility for certain workers, and would amend regulations governing the processing of applications for employment authorization.

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/skilled-workers/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/highly-skilled-workers/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/skilled-worker/

https://californiaimmigration.us/visas/h-2b-temporary-worker/

Interesting Asylum Case from North Korea

The Ninth Circuit upheld the BIA, holding that 22 USC §7842, which states that a North Korean national “shall not be considered” a South Korean national for refugee and asylum purposes, does not preclude a finding under INA §208(b)(2)(A)(vi) and 8 CFR §208.15 that a North Korean has “firmly resettled” in South Korea.

It’s expensive to file the H-1B or L-1 now

As a result of the FY2016 omnibus appropriations bill passed on December 18, 2015, thesupplemental fees for L-1 and H-1B petitions are increasing for companies that employ 50 or more employees in the United States and have more than 50 percent of their U.S. workforce in H-1B, L-1A, or L-1B nonimmigrant status. Specifically, the previously expired fees for L-1 petitions will increase from $2,250 to $4,500, and the fees for H-1B petitions will increase from $2,000 to $4,000. These supplemental fees must be paid on initial and extension petitions.