• Hours & Info

    (562) 495-0554
    M-F: 8:00am - 6:00 p.m.
    Sat: 9:00 a.m. - 12:00 p.m.
  • Past Blog Posts

  • https://api.whatsapp.com/send?phone=13104885414

Another win for Our Immigration Law Office

Cancellation of Removal granted for non permanent resident from Belize based on hardship to his U.S. citizen mother and father.  Client was in removal proceedings for over 18 years, with appeals to the 9th circuit and back, and at 34 years old, he can now remain in this country legally.

Cancellation for removal

Deportation or removal hearings

Final order of removal

How a deportation attorney can win and fight a cancellation of removal case

Cancellation of removal

Cancellation of Removal application approved for 20-year-old client with a federal felony conviction for manufacturing explosives materials.  Our office was able to reach an agreement with the Department of Homeland Security and our client’s application was approved without the need for any testimony and Client was released from custody after only two hearings, just in time for the holidays. 

Cancellation of removal

Special cancellation of removal

Applications for withholding of removal

How a deportation attorney can help you win a cancellation of removal for Non-Permanent residents

 

 

Got Voluntary Departure? Case just ruled it does NOT break continuous presence for Cancellation

Matter of CASTREJON-COLINO, 26 I&N Dec. 667 (BIA 2015)
(1) Where an alien has the right to a hearing before an Immigration Judge, a voluntary departure or return does not break the alien’s continuous physical presence for purposes of cancellation of removal under section 240A(b)(1)(A) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(1)(A) (2012), in the absence of evidence that he or she was informed of and waived the right to such a hearing. Matter of Avilez, 23 I&N Dec. 799 (BIA 2005), clarified.
(2) Evidence that an alien who had the right to a hearing before an Immigration Judge was fingerprinted and/or photographed before being allowed to voluntarily depart is not enough, in itself, to demonstrate a waiver of the right to a hearing or to show a process of sufficient formality to break continuous physical presence.

Be sure to meet your burden when applying for Cancellation of Removal

The First Circuit upheld the Board of Immigration Appeals, finding that the petitioner was not eligible for cancellation of removal, because he had failed to meet his burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence that his 2006 assault conviction was not a “crime of domestic violence.”

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/cancellation-of-removal/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/special-cancellation-of-removal/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/cancellation-for-removal/

https://californiaimmigration.us/removal/

How can I apply for Cancellation of Removal for Lawful Permanent Residents?

I’m in Deportation Proceedings. Can I apply for Cancellation of Removal?
Question: I’m in deportation proceedings and somebody stated I can apply for Cancellation of Removal. Can you shed some light on this and what is required?
Answer: The Attorney General may cancel the may cancel the removal of an Lawful Permanent Resident (LPR) if he or she: Has been “lawfully admitted for permanent residence” for 5 years, been physically present inside the United States for 7 years, is not convicted of an aggravated felony and in the discretion of the Immigration Judge, Cancellation of Removal should be granted.
Question: What is meant by being lawfully admitted for permanent Residence for 5 years?
Answer: On it’s face, it is fairly clear. It means when you have received your lawful permanent residency and you must have at least 5 years of residency upon applying for Cancellation of Removal. However, a person who obtained LPR status by fraud or mistake is deemed to have not been “lawfully admitted for permanent residence. An example would be where LPR status fraudulently obtained through bigamous marriage, respondent ineligible for cancellation. Other examples would be: Where petitioner fully disclosed his prior drug conviction but DHS granted AOS by mistake. A person given Voluntary Departure breaks the residency and would not have qualified if less than 5 years of residency. Basically you want to look at and determine if there was any fraud at the inception of obtaining residency. If you are not an actual resident now, this will also not work.

Question:What is meant by being physically present in the United States for 7 years?
Answer: Again, on its most basic level, this would apply assuming you entered the United States legally over 7 years ago. However, there are some issues. For example, continuous residence not required where the person has served in an active duty status in the Armed Forces for a minimum of 24 months and if separated, was honorably discharged, and was in the U.S. at the time of enlistment or induction.
Admission in “any status” includes admission as a temporary resident. The 7-year period must be continuous. Although physical presence is not the test, traveling back and to a foreign country will preclude you from establishing continuous residence. The 7-year period is deemed to end when the person is served with an Notice to Appear or has committed an offense that renders him or her inadmissible or removable Applicant may accrue a new 7 years when he sought to reenter as LPR after commission of a crime.
Question: What is meant by an aggravated Felony?
Answer: Since 1996, the definition of what is considered to be an aggravated felony has greatly increased. Therefore, if the Immigration Judge rules that you have committed and aggravated felon, then you will not be eligible for Cancellation of Removal for Lawful Permanent Residents. Now if you happen to have an undisputed aggravated felony, then it would be advisable to try to seek criminal relief on that particular crime so that you can either vacate it or reduce it so that you will not be considered an aggravated felon.

Question: If I do not meet either the 5 years of Lawful Permanent Residency, or the 7 years of physical presence, can I use the presence of my mother or father who would easily meet these requirements and add it to my current residency?
Answer: The Board of Immigration Appeals has held that a parent’s LPR status may not be imputed to give a child the necessary 5 years of LPR status to qualify for cancellation. It has been held that it is a reasonable construction of the statute to require each applicant to separately meet the residence requirements, and neither the 5 years of LPR status nor the 7 years of lawful admission requires the imputation of the parents’ residence to the child.
Question: What is meant by the stop-time rule?
Answer: This is basically if you commit a specified crime within either the 5 year residency requirement or the 7 year physical presence requirement, it stops the time from accruing, thereby possibly making you ineligible for Cancellation of Removal for Lawful Permanent Residents. Therefore, it would be critical to find out when the crime occurred and whether it renders you ineligible for Cancellation of Removal for Lawful Permanent Residents.

California immigration attorney

Cancellation of removal

Special cancellation of removal

Removal and immigration

Winning a deportation case through Cancellation of Removal

Cancellation of removal

Removal meaning

Removal order

How a deportation attorney can help you win a cancellation of removal for non permanent residents

Cancellation of Removal

Cancellation of Removal (42A) granted by IJ .  Client had 2 DUIs, a reckless driving and a discharge of a firearm in gross negligence.  Firearm offense would have stopped time if it was a CIMT.  Established through testimony that it was not a CIMT and Judge granted case.  Client had a long work history and one minor child but not too many other equities.

Cancellation of removal

Cancellation of removal meaning

Best deportation attorney

Removal proceedings

Entering illegally and applying for Cancellation of Removal

Cancellation of removal

Removal

Being removed?

Removal attorney

The REAL ID Act did not overrule Sandoval-Lua

The REAL ID Act did not overrule Sandoval-Lua, which held that the alien’s burden of proving eligibility for cancellation is met where the record of conviction is inconclusive as to whether the crime is an aggravated felony. (Rosas-Castaneda v. Holder, 1/4/11)

“Has been” interpretation in the Cancellation of Removal

For purposes of INA §240A(a) cancellation, the term “has been” lawfully admitted for permanent residence means that the alien must currently possess LPR status. It does not include a person who held that status but has since lost it.