• Hours & Info

    (562) 495-0554
    M-F: 8:00am - 6:00 p.m.
    Sat: 9:00 a.m. - 12:00 p.m.
  • Past Blog Posts

  • https://api.whatsapp.com/send?phone=13104885414

Another win for Law Offices of Brian D. Lerner

2011 removal order reopened based on 2 convictions that were vacated pursuant to California Penal Code § 1473.7. Because Client is no longer removable from the United States, proceedings were terminated and Client can now renew his permanent resident card and apply for naturalization/citizenship in the future.

U Visa granted for person with Removal Order

Visa approved for Client whose marriage visa was denied at the U.S. consulate, who then reentered the U.S. unlawfully and was ordered removed from the country.  After all appeals were denied, Client applied for a U visa and several stays of removal.  Client can now remain in this country with his children and become a lawful permanent resident in 3 years.

Court Affirms Reinstatement of Prior Removal Order After Illegal Reentry

The Seventh Circuit denied the petition for review, rejecting the argument that, because reentry by the previously removed petitioner was “procedurally irregular,” he was entitled to a full hearing before an immigration judge rather than being subject to reinstatement of his prior removal order.

Cancellation of removal

Cancellation of removal granted for lawful permanent resident with several convictions, including fraud and drug convictions.  Client can now apply for U.S. citizenship after living in the U.S for nearly 30 years

Cancellation of removal

What an experienced deportation lawyer can do for you

Removal

Removal proceedings

Cancellation of removal

Cancellation of Removal application approved for 20-year-old client with a federal felony conviction for manufacturing explosives materials.  Our office was able to reach an agreement with the Department of Homeland Security and our client’s application was approved without the need for any testimony and Client was released from custody after only two hearings, just in time for the holidays. 

Cancellation of removal

Special cancellation of removal

Applications for withholding of removal

How a deportation attorney can help you win a cancellation of removal for Non-Permanent residents

 

 

The Sixth Circuit interpreted INA §240 as requiring that personal service be made upon a noncitizen whenever practicable, and held that personal service to a represented noncitizen’s counsel may, in certain cases, constitute personal service to the noncitizen. The court upheld the Board of Immigration Appeals, finding that the respondent, who was ordered removed in absentia after failing to appear at a master calendar hearing in his removal proceedings, had received sufficient notice under the INA, where the respondent’s counsel was personally served with written notice of the hearing on the day that he appeared with the respondent in immigration court

Removal proceedings

Order of removal

Removal or deportation hearings

Cancellation of removal

Case out of 5th Circuit Prohibits application for Asylum

The Fifth Circuit affirmed the Board of Immigration Appeals’ denial of the petition for review, finding that INA §241(a)(5)’s plain language, relevant regulations, and analogous case law compel the conclusion that immigrants whose removal orders are reinstated following illegal re-entry into the United States may not apply for asylum.

The Fifth Circuit affirmed the Board of Immigration Appeals’ denial of the petition for review, finding that INA §241(a)(5)’s plain language, relevant regulations, and analogous case law compel the conclusion that immigrants whose removal orders are reinstated following illegal re-entry into the United States may not apply for asylum.

Appeal asylum

People seeking asylum into U.S.

Asylum agreements

Get a California deportation attorney to help you file asylum

Supreme Court Holds That Only Substances Defined as “Controlled” Under §802 Trigger Removal

The Supreme Court reversed the Eighth Circuit, finding that INA §237(a)(2)(B)(i) triggers removal only when the government can prove a connection between an element of an immigrant’s drug conviction and a “controlled substance” as defined in 21 USC §802.

Cancellation for removal

Removal proceedings

Removal of the conditional residence 

Can I be removed?

Another win for the Law Offices of Brian D. Lerner

Another win for the Law Offices of Brian D. Lerner.
Deferral of removal under the Convention Against Torture granted IJ Neumeister based on the murder of several of Client’s family members by Mexican authorities and sexual abuse suffered as a child. Client was in withholding only proceedings because of a previous deport order and was not eligible for withholding under the Act or withholding under CAT because of an aggravated felony conviction. DHS reserved appeal. Client should be released shortly.

DHS meaning

Department of homeland security

DHS appeal

DHS rescission of safe harbor procedures for employers