• Hours & Info

    (562) 495-0554
    M-F: 8:00am - 6:00 p.m.
    Sat: 9:00 a.m. - 12:00 p.m.
  • Past Blog Posts

  • https://api.whatsapp.com/send?phone=13104885414

Crime of Violence

Matter of Guzman-Polanco, 26 I&N Dec. 806 (BIA 2016)

The crime of aggravated battery in violation of the Puerto Rico Penal Code is not categorically a crime of violence under 18 U.S.C. § 16(a) (2012), but controlling circuit court law should be followed regarding the question whether conduct such as the use or threatened use of poison to injure another person involves sufficient “force” to constitute a crime of violence. Matter of Guzman-Polanco, 26 I&N Dec. 713 (BIA 2016), clarified.

Immigration crimes

Immigration and crimes

Crimes of violence

Can I be deported for this crime? 

 

 

 

 

Nonimmigrant Waivers Not allowed in Immigration Court

Matter of KHAN,  26 I&N Dec. 797 (BIA 2016)
Immigration Judges do not have authority to adjudicate a request for a waiver of inadmissibility under section 212(d)(3)(A)(ii) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1182(d)(3)(A)(ii) (2012), by a petitioner for U nonimmigrant status.

Nonimmigrant waiver

Fee waiver

New waiver

Nonimmigrant waiver by US Immigration Attorney

Stay Lifted on Divisibility cases

Matter of CHAIREZ and SAMA, 26 I&N Dec. 796 (PDF)
The Attorney General lifted the stay and remanded these cases to the Board of Immigration Appeals for appropriate action.

Divisibility 

Immigration cases

What is an immigration case?

Our Immigration Law Firm

Fraud Waiver does NOT Waive CMT

Matter of TIMA, 26 I&N Dec. 839 (BIA 2016)
A fraud waiver under section 237(a)(1)(H) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(1)(H) (2012), cannot waive an alien’s removability under section 237(a)(2)(A)(i) for having been convicted of a crime involving moral turpitude, even if the conviction is based on the underlying fraud.

Fee-waiver

Immigration-waiver

Immigration waiver meaning

New waiver

New Immigration Employment regs

USCIS has published a final rule to modernize and improve several aspects of certain employment-based nonimmigrant and immigrant visa programs. USCIS has also amended regulations to better enable U.S. employers to hire and retain certain foreign workers who are beneficiaries of approved employment-based immigrant visa petitions and are waiting to become lawful permanent residents. This rule goes into effect on Jan. 17, 2017.
Among other things, DHS is amending its regulations to:
Clarify and improve longstanding DHS policies and practices implementing sections of the American Competitiveness in the Twenty-First Century Act and the American Competitiveness and Workforce Improvement Act related to certain foreign workers, which will enhance USCIS’ consistency in adjudication.

Better enable U.S. employers to employ and retain high-skilled workers who are beneficiaries of approved employment-based immigrant visa petitions (Form I-140 petitions) while also providing stability and job flexibility to these workers. The rule increases the ability of these workers to further their careers by accepting promotions, changing positions with current employers, changing employers and pursuing other employment opportunities.

Improve job portability for certain beneficiaries of approved Form I-140 petitions by maintaining a petition’s validity under certain circumstances despite an employer’s withdrawal of the approved petition or the termination of the employer’s business.

Clarify and expand when individuals may keep their priority date when applying for adjustment of status to lawful permanent residence.

Allow certain high-skilled individuals in the United States with E-3, H-1B, H-1B1, L-1 or O-1 nonimmigrant status, including any applicable grace period, to apply for employment authorization for a limited period if:
They are the principal beneficiaries of an approved Form I-140 petition,
An immigrant visa is not authorized for issuance for their priority date.

Employment and immigration

Employment adjustment

Employment authorization

Employment woes in the US have decreased the number of unauthorized immigrant population

Crime involving Moral Turpitude

Petit larceny in violation of section 155.25 of the New York Penal Law, which requires an intent to deprive the owner of his property either permanently or under circumstances where the owner’s property rights are substantially eroded, is categorically a crime involving moral turpitude. Matter of Diaz-Lizarraga, 26 I&N Dec. 847 (BIA 2016).

USCIS Reaches CW-1 Cap for FY2017

USCIS announced that it has received enough petitions to reach the numerical limit of 12,998 workers who may be issued CNMI-Only Transitional Worker (CW-1) visas or otherwise provided with CW-1 status for FY2017. The final receipt date for CW-1 worker petitions requesting an employment start date before October 1, 2017, was October 14, 2016.

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/cw-1/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/american-workers/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/immigration-workers/

https://californiaimmigration.us/undocumented-workers/

Court Upholds District Court’s Denial of Naturalization Due to Unauthorized Employment

The Eighth Circuit held that the district court did not err in relying on the petitioner’s certified naturalization application, his sworn statements, and corroborating letters, when it denied his naturalization petition on the grounds that he had violated the terms of his religious worker visa by accepting employment before receiving authorization to do so.

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/unauthorized-employment/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/employment/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/employment-authorization/

https://californiaimmigration.us/employment-woes-in-the-us-have-decreased-the-number-of-unauthorized-immigrant-population/

Court Says Noncitizen Issued an Expedited Removal Order at Border Checkpoint Has “Re-Entered” Under INA §241(a)(5)

In a question of first impression for the federal courts, the Ninth Circuit denied the petition for review, holding that a noncitizen who is issued an expedited removal order at a U.S. border-crossing checkpoint has entered the United States for purposes of reinstatement of removal under INA §241(a)(5). The court noted that its decision is limited to the reinstatement provision’s definition of “re-entry,” and that it does not disturb the longstanding common-law definition of “entry.”

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/cancelation-of-removal/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/removal/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/reinstatement-of-removal/

https://californiaimmigration.us/removal/

TPS for Nepal Extended for 18 Months

DHS extended Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for eligible nationals of Nepal (and those without nationality who last habitually resided in Nepal) for an additional 18 months, effectiveDecember 25, 2016, through June 24, 2018. The 60-day re-registration period runs throughDecember 27, 2016. This extension also allows TPS re-registrants to apply for a new Employment Authorization Document (EAD) with an expiration date of June 24, 2018. USCIS is automatically extending current TPS Nepal EADs with a December 24, 2016, expiration date for six months.

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/extension-of-tps/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/tps/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/uscis-tps/

https://californiaimmigration.us/our-immigration-law-firm/