• Hours & Info

    3233 E. Broadway,
    Long Beach, CA 90803
    (562) 495-0554
    M-F: 8:00am - 6:00 p.m.
    Sat: 9:00 a.m. - 12:00 p.m.

  • Past Blog Posts

  • https://api.whatsapp.com/send?phone=13104885414

Title: Employment Based Petitions Just Got Faster

Posted on August 20, 2025 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney

Question: I filed a Labor Certification several years ago and it has just been certified. Now I am told that I must file the I-140 or Employment based petition. Additionally, I am told that only afterwards can I file the Adjustment of Status Petition. I urgently need to work and to leave the U.S., but cannot because it will take a considerable amount of time to process the I-140. Is there anything I can do to speed up the process?

Answer: Yes. You are very fortunate as new regulations were just passed by the Immigration and Naturalization Service which allow concurrent filings in certain situations for the I-140 Employment Petition and the I-485 Adjustment of Status Applications.

Question: Why Is the Service Issuing This Rule?

Answer: This interim rule is necessary to improve both efficiency and customer service, and to support the Service’s long-established goals for filing of petitions and applications via direct mail. Currently, as you are aware, an alien can only submit Form I-485 after the alien has had his or her underlying visa petition, Form I-140, approved, and when an immigrant visa is immediately available. Due to these requirements there has been a delay from the time the Form I-140 is filed with the Service until the alien worker, for whom a visa is otherwise immediately available, can properly file Form I-485 with the Service. The most practical and efficient way to eliminate this delay is to permit concurrent filing of Form I-485 together with Form I-140 in cases in which a visa is immediately available. Concurrent filing eliminates the delay that takes place between approval of Form I-140 and the subsequent filing of Form I-485. This interim rule provides for such concurrent filing.

Question: Does This Interim Rule Change or Amend the Substantive Eligibility Requirements for the Visa Petition or Permanent Residence Applications?

Answer: No, this interim rule does not change the current substantive requirements governing eligibility for and adjudication of the Form I-140 nor for the Form I-485.

Question: Who Is Eligible to File Forms I-140 and I-485 Concurrently?

Answer: Forms I-140 and I-485 may be filed concurrently only when an immigrant visa number is immediately available. This interim rule does not change the existing requirement that a visa number must be immediately available before an alien can apply for permanent resident status.

Question: If a Form I-140 Visa Petition Previously Filed for an Alien Worker Is Still Pending with the Service on or After the Date this Rule was published, and a Visa Number is immediately available, can the alien file Form I-485?

Answer: Yes, upon issuance of this rule, an alien whose Form I-140 visa petition is pending with the Service may file Form I-485, together with associated forms and fees, with the Service office at which the visa petition was filed. When filing Form I-485, the alien will be required to attach a copy of the Form I-797, Notice of Action, establishing previous receipt and acceptance by the Service of the underlying Form I-140 visa petition. When an immigrant visa is immediately available, Form I-485 may be filed either concurrently with the Form I-140 or anytime thereafter.

This is a very nice development from the Immigration and Naturalization Service. It will make both their adjudication more efficient, and persons whom want to work sooner on employment based visas will be able to do so considerably quicker than before.

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/employment-based-immigration/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/employment-based-immigration-attorney/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/employment-based-petition/

https://californiaimmigration.us/family-and-employment-based-applicants-on-the-rise

Filed under: best deportation attorney | Tagged: , , , , | Leave a comment »

Title:How to Age-out without having to Age-out

Posted on August 19, 2025 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney

Question: My mother filed a petition for me some years back. I will be 21 years old in September of this year. My understanding is that I am now an immediate relative which allows me to come into the U.S. right away when the Visa Number becomes current. However, once I am over 21 years old, I understand that I will move to a different preference and could actually wait over 10 years to be reunited with my mother. Is this true and is there anything I can do?

Answer: First, you are correct in your current assessment of the situation. However, the President of the United States has just signed a bill which will be most beneficial to those who will ‘age-out’. This is a term for a person whom is about to turn 21 years old and not be eligible for ‘immediate relative status’. The new bill is referred to as the Child Status Protection Act.

Question: What exactly is an Immediate Relative and how does this bill help me?

Answer: An Immediate Relative are those relationships that the U.S. Government deems so important that it does not place any numerical limitation on those who qualify and the only waiting someone has to do for this category is processing time. Other than immediate relatives, there are several other types of petitions that people must wait years for the visa number to become current. Examples of immediate relative petitions are spouses of U.S. Citizens, children whom are unmarried and under 21 years old of U.S. Citizens and parents of U.S. Citizens over the age of 21 years old. Normally, the beneficiary must obtain their Green Card BEFORE they turn 21 years old if it is a child.

Now, based upon the Child Protection Status Act, if the petition was filed for a child, the age of the child is determined when the petition is FILED, not when it is approved.

If the petition was filed based upon a Lawful Permanent Resident parent petitioning a child, they must usually wait many years. Once the parent naturalizes and becomes a U.S. Citizen, then an immediate relative petition can be filed. In this new law, the age of the child at the time the parent naturalizes is what determines immediate relative status, not the time at which the petition is approved. Therefore, for you, your mother must see if she qualifies to become a U.S. Citizen, and apply for Naturalization right away. She should try to get it expedited.

If a married son or daughter of a U.S. Citizen gets divorced and the petition is converted to single child under 21 of a U.S. Citizen, the date the married son or daughter gets divorced is the date to determine if he or she is an immediate relative, not the date the converted petition would get approved.

Question: I have a child who is 3 years old. Assuming I qualify for this new law, what about my daughter?

Answer: Fortunately, the new law also takes care of this type of situation. If a spouse or child is not considered to be an immediate relative themselves, they can apply under this new law to join the spouse or parent as in your case.

As you can see, the U.S. Government has taken significant steps toward helping to unify the Family Unity. This is an excellent piece of legislation and hopefully will be used to its fullest extent.

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/child-citizenshjip-protection-act/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/child-status-protection-act/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/equal-protection/

https://californiaimmigration.us/family-petitions-to-immigrate-family-members/child-status

Filed under: best deportation attorney | Tagged: , , , , | Leave a comment »

Title: My mother became a U.S. Citizen and now I have to wait 5 more years

Posted on August 18, 2025 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney

Question: My mother filed a petition for me some years back. I am from the Philippines. She was a Lawful Permanent Resident at the time. Just last year she became a U.S. Citizen. I was sure that now it would take faster for me to get my Green Card. Unfortunately when I called, they told me that the Philippines, unlike the rest of the world has too much of a backlog on that category, and that it would take about 5 years longer because my mother became a U.S. Citizen. I think that is so unfair. Is there anything I can do?

Answer: Yes. The President of the United States has just signed a bill referred to as the Child Status Protection Act. While a large part of the bill deals exclusively with persons who are going to ‘age-out’ or turn 21 years old, there is a very specific provision in the bill for people in your situation. It is specifically for persons who are the unmarried sons or daughters of a Lawful Permanent Resident parent. Once petitioned, the visa number availability falls under a certain preference category for Lawful Permanent Residents. That parent petitions them and at some later point naturalizes and becomes a U.S. Citizen. This now moves the petition into a different category where the wait for most of the rest of the world (other than the Philippines) is considerably shorter.

Question: What exactly does this bill do?

Answer: It gives you the right to write the Attorney General and tell him that you do not want the preference to automatically change. In other words, for people in your exact situation, you can make an election for the preference to stay exactly the same as if your mother was still a Lawful Permanent Resident

Question: What exactly does that do?

Answer: It means that you do not have to wait another 5 years to get your Green Card. Let’s pretend that your mother is still a Lawful Permanent Resident. If the priority date is current now, you can apply right now for Lawful Permanent Residency without waiting another 5 years. You will be able to be joined with your family years earlier.

Question: It seems as though this law just came out. My mother filed the petition for me many years ago. Can I still take benefit of this new law?

Answer: The answer is yes. The law allows you to take advantage of this law if the petition for your family preference was filed, but a visa has not yet been issued, or you have not yet adjusted your status. Also, the petition for the family preference can be pending as of now either with the Department of State or the Department of Justice. It is a very nice law for people especially from the Philippines. Therefore, anyone who has been waiting years for this petition to become current, only to learn that they must wait many more years after becoming a U.S. Citizen, should take advantage of this law right away. 

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/acquisition-of-u-s-citizenship/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/aquisition-of-citizenship/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/claim-to-us-citizenship/

https://californiaimmigration.us/citizenship/

Filed under: best deportation attorney | Tagged: , , , , | Leave a comment »

Title: Why am I penalized because my father became a U.S. Citizen?

Posted on August 14, 2025 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney

Question: I have seen your previous articles on the new Age-Out provisions of the law just recently passed. My father filed a petition for me around 1993. I am from the Philippines. He was a Lawful Permanent Resident at the time. Three years ago he became a U.S. Citizen. I was actually called for the interview at the U.S. embassy in the Philippines, but when they found out my father was a U.S. Citizen, they said my visa number was not current and made me leave. Can I still avail of this new law?

Answer: Yes. The President of the United States has just signed a bill referred to as the Child Status Protection Act. While a large part of the bill deals exclusively with persons who are going to ‘age-out’ or turn 21 years old, there is a very specific provision in the bill for people in your situation. It is specifically for persons who are the unmarried sons or daughters of a Lawful Permanent Resident parent. Once petitioned, the visa number availability falls under a certain preference category for Lawful Permanent Residents. That parent petitions them and at some later point naturalizes and becomes a U.S. Citizen. This now moves the petition into a different category where the wait for most of the rest of the world (other than the Philippines) is considerably shorter.

Question: What exactly does this bill do?

Answer: It gives you the right to write the Attorney General and tell him that you do not want the preference to automatically change. In other words, for people in your exact situation, you can make an election for the preference to stay exactly the same as if your mother was still a Lawful Permanent Resident

Question: What exactly does that do?

Answer: It means that you do not have to wait another 5 years to get your Green Card. Let’s pretend that your mother is still a Lawful Permanent Resident. If the priority date is current now, you can apply right now for Lawful Permanent Residency without waiting another 5 years. You will be able to be joined with your family years earlier.

Question: My friend is in the same situation, but she got into the U.S. and her kids did not. Can her children avail of this section?

Answer: Most probably not. Once there has either been a final Adjustment of Status or issuance of Lawful Permanent Residency, the law seems to indicate that derivative beneficiaries (i.e. the children) are no longer eligible. However, if it is still pending, then the law can be taken advantage of.

Question: It seems as though this law just came out. My mother filed the petition for me many years ago. Can I still take benefit of this new law?

Answer: The answer is yes. The law allows you to take advantage of this law if the petition for your family preference was filed, but a visa has not yet been issued, or you have not yet adjusted your status. Also, the petition for the family preference can be pending as of now either with the Department of State or the Department of Justice. It is a very nice law for people especially from the Philippines. Therefore, anyone who has been waiting years for this petition to become current, only to learn that they must wait many more years after becoming a U.S. Citizen, should take advantage of this law right away.

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/citizenship/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/citizenship-question/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/acquisition-of-u-s-citizenship/

https://californiaimmigration.us/citizenship/

Filed under: best deportation attorney | Tagged: , , , , | Leave a comment »

Title: Have I or Have I not “Aged-Out”?

Posted on August 13, 2025 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney

Question: I know that President Bush has signed into law the new Child Status Protection Act (CSPA) on August 6, 2002. However, I am very confused on whether this law applies to me. Can you clarify how I know if I have ‘aged-out’ under the new law?

Answer: First, there are sections that apply to Immediate Relatives. Generally, these would be spouses of U.S. Citizens, parents of U.S. Citizens over 21 years of age and sons/daughters of U.S. Citizens who are under 21 years of age and unmarried.

Thus, most of the child age-out provisions will apply to the last category. Here, if the beginning of the family petition is filed BEFORE the child turns 21, then no matter how long it takes, that child will be deemed to be a child for immigration purposes.

Question: What if my parent was a Lawful Permanent Resident when he filed for me and I was under 21 at the time, but now my parent has become a U.S. Citizen?

Answer: In this case, the date that your parent naturalizes will control. Therefore, if your parent naturalized and you were 20 years old, then you will be considered a ‘child’ who will not age-out for this act. Therefore, it would be critical if your parent has not yet naturalized, and you are under 21 years of age, that they immediately begin naturalization proceedings.

Question: What if my friend was married at 18 years of age and then got divorced at 20 years of age? Will he qualify?

Answer: Yes. If his U.S. Citizen parent has petitioned him, then he will automatically move to the preference which is set for single son and daughters of U.S. Citizen Parents.

Question: Is the law retroactive and how do I know if I fall under it?

Answer: It appears as though current interpretation is that if there was a final decision on the case, that it is not retroactive. However, if the case is still pending, it appears that it will fall of the provisions of this act. Please note that the interpretations by the Department of State seem also to indicate that if derivative beneficiaries have not had a final approval on the case, but that the main applicant has, that it still could fall under this act.

Therefore, anyone who has been waiting years for this petition to become current, only to learn that they must wait many more years after becoming a U.S. Citizen, should take advantage of this law right away. All of these interpretations are from the Department of State. They have specifically stated that they might be able to change those interpretations after interagency communications. Therefore, what is stated here might change as time goes on. It hopefully will change to allow even more people fall under the provisions of this particular law.

Filed under: best deportation attorney | Tagged: , , , , | Leave a comment »

Title: ESSENTIAL WORKERS HELP OUR ECONOMY Part II

Posted on August 12, 2025 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney

Question: What are Essential Workers?

Answer: “Essential Workers” are the unskilled and semi-skilled workers employed in all sectors of our economy. Essential workers include restaurant workers, retail clerks, construction trades people, manufacturing line workers, hotel service workers, food production workers, landscape workers, and health care aids. It includes a multitude of other types of professions. These individuals often work in the jobs that many Americans do not choose, but which are “essential” to keep our economy and our country growing.

Question: Are there not enough U.S. workers for these jobs?

Answer: The demographics say no. By 2010, total civilian employment is projected to be 167.8 million, but the total civilian labor force is expected to be 158 million, more than nine million more jobs than people.

New jobs will increase dramatically by 2010, boosting the demand for Essential Workers. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) projections indicate that the U.S. will create 22 million new jobs by 2010. During this period, the service-producing sector alone is expected to create over 12 million new positions. Along with this growth, 57% of all job openings will be for “Essential Worker positions” and will only require moderate or short term on the job training.

Unskilled and semi-skilled occupations have the highest projected growth rate. The Department of Labor ranked the top 30 occupations with the largest projected job growth from 2001-2010. Of the occupations listed, 16 require unskilled or semi skilled laborers.

The U.S. is not producing enough new workers. More than 60 million current employees will likely retire over the next 30 years. After 2011, the year in which the first of the Baby Boomers turns 65, their retirement rates will reach proportions so huge that, barring unforeseen increases in immigration and/or participation rates among the elderly, there will be a reduction in the total size of the nation’s workforce.

Employers are doing the “right” things. Essential Worker employers have led the way in welfare-to-work, school-to-work and other initiatives that have been successful in reducing welfare rolls and getting graduates jobs, but these efforts still are insufficient. Employers are raising wages, offering improved benefits, signing bonuses and relocation pay.

Question: Isn’t there already a visa category for essential workers that these employers can use?

Answer: Yes and No. The H-2B temporary visa program is useful only for employers who can establish that their need for foreign workers is temporary (seasonal, a one-time occurrence, or a peak load or intermittent need). If the employer’s need is year-round or does not fall into one of the definitions used by the Department of Labor or Immigration Service, the employer cannot use the H-2B classification to fill labor needs. A nonimmigrant visa category does not exist for employers who need workers for more than one year or for employers who have permanent or long-term jobs, for example in the health care, retail, hospitality and other industries. Even for employers with truly temporary needs, the H-2B category backlogged and fraught with bureaucratic red tape that makes it extremely time-consuming and difficult to use. The permanent immigrant category for non-professionals in occupations that require less than two years’ experience is virtually useless; only 5,000 visas are available annually, and the backlog of waiting cases is over ten years long. As a result, employers often are forced to send their work overseas, cut back, or close their doors.

Question: With concerns about national security, is now the time to look at a temporary worker program?

Answer: Yes. A temporary worker program would help control immigration by legalizing the flow of people seeking to enter and leave this country. It would help satisfy the U.S. demand for workers and provide a legal and safe mechanism for workers to enter and leave the U.S.

Question: What needs to be done to be able to increase the number of immigration workers for these types of petitions?

Answer: U.S.-Mexico should resume immigration talks. Just prior to the September 11th attacks, President Fox and President Bush had just begun discussing a migration plan for comprehensive immigration reform between the U.S. and Mexico. Now, a year later, it is time for “los dos amigos” to renew their commitments to one another and resume their discussions on immigration initiatives that will benefit both our countries such as: an earned legalization program; an expanded permanent visa program; an enhanced temporary visa program; border control cooperation and economic development in Mexican immigrant sending regions.

The immigration reform proposal mirrors the recommendations by a bi-national working group from the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace and the Autonomous Technological Institute of Mexico (ITAM) that call for both countries to reach a “grand bargain” that included various legalization measures for undocumented Mexicans in the United States, expanding the legal work visas available to migrants, equalizing the treatment of Mexican citizens under NAFTA immigration provisions, cracking down on immigrant smugglers and preventing dangerous border crossings.

Congress needs to update our immigration laws and policies to reflect the needs of our economy. The United States needs a regulated, workable immigration system that allows foreign nationals to work here when there is evidence of a shortage of available U.S. workers, and that allows those individuals already here and working to obtain legal status. Our laws also should allow those individuals to obtain green cards immediately when there is a permanent job.

Essential Worker Immigration Coalition (EWIC). A coalition of employer associations from sectors of the economy that rely heavily on essential workers, including hospitality, retail, restaurants, construction, recreation, transportation and others (including AILA), has been formed in Washington to work toward a broad solution to the essential worker issue. The agenda of this coalition includes reforming the current temporary visa category (H-2B), creating a new and longer-term nonimmigrant visa for essential workers (similar to H-1B), increasing the available green cards for essential workers and providing for earned adjustment for essential workers already in the U.S.

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/essential-workers/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/h1b-2/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/h1b/

https://californiaimmigration.us/cant-get-h-1b-try-o-1

Filed under: best deportation attorney | Tagged: , , , , | Leave a comment »

Title: I’m over 21, but the law says I’m under 21

Posted on August 7, 2025 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney

Question: I know that the Child Protection Act has been passed on August 6, 2002. However, I am still confused if I fall under this provision. Can you help to clarify?

Answer: Yes. The Child Status Protection Act (CSPA) makes certain allowances for people who have become older than 21 years old, but can still have their applications processed as though they are under 21 years old.

IMMEDIATE RELATIVES: The first category is Immediate Relatives. These people will be able to be considered to be able to immediately apply to adjust their status to that of a Lawful Permanent Resident, even though they may be over 21 years old. If you are in the U.S. and want to adjust your status to that of a Lawful Permanent Resident, there are a couple of grounds upon which to do this under the Immediate Relative provisions of the CSPA.

If you are under 21 years old when a petition is filed for you by your U.S. Citizen parent, you will be considered to have not ‘aged-out’ even if your status is not adjudicated until after you are 21 years old. The critical factor will be when the initial I-130 is filed. It is how old you are on the date the I-130 is filed that will determine if you remain a “child” for purposes of not ‘aging-out’.

Question: What if my parent was a Lawful Permanent Resident when the I-130 was filed, and later became a U.S. Citizen?

Answer: In that case, the critical date that will determine if you are a child who will not age-out will be the date your parent became a U.S. Citizen, not the date the I-130 was filed. For example, let us say that the I-130 was filed when you were 18, and your parent naturalized when you were 20 year old. In this example, even if the adjustment was not done until after you were 21 years old, you would be considered to remain at 20 years old and therefore, not to have aged-out when you turn 21 years old. It makes it critically important that your parent become a U.S. Citizen right way if they are eligible if you happen to be less than 21 years old.

Question: What if my parent is not eligible to become a Naturalized U.S. Citizen? Can I still avail of the CSPA?

Answer: In this case, the date that the Immigration and Naturalization Service will look at to determine if a person is a ‘child’ under the CSPA will not be when the I-130 is filed, nor when the parent would become a U.S. Citizen, but rather, when the priority date becomes current. It is critically important that if you fall under this category, that you make certain that you file for Adjustment of Status within ONE year of the priority date becoming current. Otherwise, you cannot fall under the provisions of the CSPA.

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/cspa/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/child-status-protection-act/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/child-citizenshjip-protection-act/

https://californiaimmigration.us/businesses-subject-to-punishment-with-new-protection-act

Filed under: best deportation attorney | Tagged: , , , , | Leave a comment »

Is there hope for me in deportation proceedings?

Posted on August 6, 2025 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney

Question: I have been in the United States for 13 years and have worked illegally the entire time. My boss just came to me last week and said the Social Security Department has sent him notification that there is something wrong with my Social Security Number and that he must terminate my position. Two days later I got a letter from the Immigration and Naturalization Service that I am in deportation proceedings. Do I have any hope?

Answer: First, the Social Security Department has been getting much stricter on notifying employers when a Social Security Card does not match the employees information. Previously, they had done this only when there was an employer with a large amount of employees who had incorrect information (e.g., fake social security cards.) However, in the current world we live in, they are now sending employers the request for confirmation of the Social Security Card if a single employee’s information does not match. Under the immigration laws, they are then forbidden to keep the employee hired without violating the law.

Unfortunately, you are now in Removal Proceedings and the INS will try to have you deported. Fortunately, the United States has several options for people in Removal (or deportation) Proceedings even if they have worked out of status and are here in the United States illegally. There is what is known as Cancellation of Removal. In order to qualify for this type of relief, you need several things. First, you must have been physically present in the United States for at least ten years. Secondly, you must have good moral character. Finally, you must have an immediate Lawful Permanent Resident Relative or United States Citizen who will suffer extreme hardship if you are deported or removed from the United States.

Question: I do have two United States Citizen Children. However, how would I possibly show or prove that they would suffer extreme hardship if I were deported?

Answer: You have actually hit on the most difficult part of a Cancellation of Removal case. It is showing the extreme hardship. Previously, if you had children that were of at least five or six years old, it was not difficult to prove this issue. Then the Board of Immigration Appeals came out with a case that basically made it incredibly difficult to meet the extreme hardship burden. Recently, the Board of Immigration Appeals has seemed to back off of such a stringent interpretation of the issue of showing extreme hardship. It is known as the Recinas case and was decided less than one month ago. In fact, the exact terminology that you must consider is ‘exceptional and extremely unusual’ hardship. Therefore, the hardship associated with a normal deportation will not suffice. However, under Recinas, you do not need to show that the hardship would be unconscionable. In deciding a Cancellation of Removal claim, consideration and evidence should be given to the age, health and circumstances of the family members. Some of the factors would include how a lower standard of living or adverse country conditions in the country of return might affect those relatives.

Question: What type of factors should I present to show the hardship?

Answer: In addition to the above, try to show all U.S. Citizen family members who interact with your children (such as a Grandmother or Grandfather.) Present evidence on how little knowledge they have of their home country, or how they may not know the language and culture of the home country. Present evidence showing financial, emotional and medical hardships. Also, show that there are no other realistic means for you to ever immigrate to the U.S. again. Basically, it is not easy to obtain Cancellation of Removal, but if all the evidence is presented and all of the different factors are taken into account regarding the hardship, there is a chance you will be granted your Lawful Permanent Residence based upon Cancellation of Removal.

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/deportation-proceedings/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/best-deportation-attorney/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/deportation/

https://californiaimmigration.us/removal/winning-a-deportation-proceeding-from-an-immigration-lawyer-and-deportation-attorney

Filed under: best deportation attorney | Tagged: , , , , | Leave a comment »

Immigration Article: Can I still Change my Status?

Posted on August 4, 2025 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney

Question: I know that the immigration laws now only allow me to come into the U.S. on a Visitor Visa for only 30 days. I was planning to go to the U.S. to visit, and then later, if I found a good job offer, to change my status to some type of working status. Additionally, if I later decided, I was going to change my status to that of a student. Can I still do this?

Answer: It appears that it will be much more difficult to change your status in this type of situation. Normally, when visitors came to the U.S. under the B1/B2 Visa, they had six months. At some later point after entering, they would be able to change their status. Please note that some rumors have been spreading that there is no more change of status applications being accepted. This is simply not true. Rather, it is the effect of applying for a change of status once you enter the U.S. that is the problem.

Question: Can you elaborate on what exactly is the problem?

Answer: Actually, when you come in on a Visitor Visa, you are supposed to be doing exactly that. VISITING! That means going to Disneyland, visiting relatives, and having a good time. It does not mean going to school, getting a job or applying for the Green Card. If you come to the U.S. and within 30 days apply for a change of status to some other type of status such as student or worker, the INS may not believe that you intended to ever really visit the U.S. They may assume that you used the Visitor Visa as a means to get into the U.S. so that you could do what you really wanted to do (such as work or go to school.)

Question: What if I come to the U.S. on a Visitor Visa and then marry my girlfriend in order to get the Green Card?

Answer: Again, the INS would look at this as fraud. In fact, if you get married within less than 60 days after entry to the U.S. on the Visitor Visa, you are presumed to have committed fraud. Not only will the application for Lawful Permanent Residency be denied, you could very well get deported because of the fraud.

Question: What are the consequences of doing the change of status right after entering the U.S.?

Answer: First, they could deny your change of status application and you could go out of status. Next, the INS may very well assume that you committed fraud. That is, when you got the Visitor Visa and entered the U.S. that you did not really intend to visit, but rather, intended to go to school or to work in the United States. If that happens, you could be deported because you committed misrepresentation and fraud. The fraud will stay with you forever and never goes away. If you ever want to reenter the U.S., you will need to get a Fraud Waiver. Those are not easy waivers to obtain.

Question: What is the best way to avoid these drastic consequences?

Answer: First, the way that people come into the U.S. is probably going to change. You must decide whether you want to go to school or work since these are the options you might be considering. If you are intending on going to school, then you should get the I-20 and apply for the Student Visa from your home country. Then, when you enter the U.S., you will be entering as a Student, not a Visitor. Alternatively, if you want to work in the U.S., you should have your sponsor file the petition prior to you getting to the U.S. Therefore, you will not have any allegations by INS that you committed fraud. You need to be very careful if you come to the U.S. with a Visitor Visa and then change your status right away. Obviously, since you only will be getting 30 days in the U.S., you must strongly consider not getting a change of status in the U.S.

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/change-of-status-to-student-visa/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/change-of-status/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/status/

https://californiaimmigration.us/investment-visas/eb-5-investment-visa/termination-of-status/

Filed under: best deportation attorney | Tagged: , , , , | Leave a comment »

Title: Will I qualify for a work permit?

Posted on July 31, 2025 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney

Question: I entered the United States a couple of months ago as a visitor and would now like to work in the United States. I have a degree in Business with an emphasis in accounting and have a couple of firms interested in hiring me. Do I qualify for a work permit, and if so, what must I do?

Answer: First, based upon your degree, you qualify for what is known as a Specialty Occupation Work Visa. This is also known as the H-1B. It is meant for positions which require specialized knowledge and where a college degree is the norm for the industry. Therefore, your position would qualify. You would need to be hired as an accountant.

Question: How do you know that an accountant is a specialty occupation?

Answer: There are many sources that can be viewed from the Department of Labor. These sources are either on the internet, or in printed publication. It basically states what the normal duties for the particular position are and what are the normal educational requirements needed to successfully perform the job.

Question: What type of company must sponsor me?

Answer: As an accountant, any company can sponsor you. Every company can use an accountant. If you had said that you had a degree in biology, your sponsoring companies would have to be much narrower. They would specifically have to deal with biology. The H-1B can be full-time or part-time.

Question: Do I have to leave the U.S. to get the visa?

Answer: Yes, you would have to leave the U.S. to get the visa. However, should you want to stay in the U.S., you can get a change of status from B2 (Visitor), to H-1B (Specialty Occupation Work Visa) Then, you would not have to leave the United States in order to start working for the company. However, if you did leave the United States, you would have to get the Visa in order to return to the United States. It is always possible to get the Visa approved at INS, but to get it denied at the Consulate. You would want to take this into consideration if you decided to leave after successfully getting your status changed to H-1B.

Question: How long does it take to get the answer from INS on whether they will approve the H-1B Petition?

Answer: Now it is taking from 6 to 9 months depending where you live. Should you want it much faster than that, you can put it through INS via Premium Processing. This is exactly what it implies. It goes to the top of the stack and is processed by INS within 15 days of receipt. All you need to do is pay INS $1,000.00 for them to process it as a Premium Process case. If they do not get the answer back to you within 15 days, then you get your $1,000.00 back.

Thus, the H-1B is a very good visa for someone with a college education to have. If you can get a sponsor related to your college degree, then you can see if the H-1B can be done. Usually, it is issued initially for 3 years and can be extended for another 3 years. In cases whereby the person has applied for Labor Certification and has waited for a considerable period of time, they can now apply for an even further extension of the H-1B. It is one of the nicest and most popular work visas available.

Filed under: best deportation attorney | Tagged: , , , , | Leave a comment »

« Previous Page — Next Page »

  • Brian D. Lerner

    Immigration Lawyer

  • Blog Stats

    • 305,561 Visitors

  • Categories

  • Recent Posts