• Hours & Info

    M-F: 8:00am - 6:00 p.m.
    Sat: 9:00 a.m. - 12:00 p.m.
  • Past Blog Posts

  • https://api.whatsapp.com/send?phone=13104885414

Form G-646 regarding Refugees Applying for Admission to the U.S.

USCIS issued a comment request on revision of Form G-646, Sworn Statement of Refugee Applying for Admission to the U.S. All issues regarding the Form G-646 and the application are discussed. Written comments must be submitted by 3/3/10.

Adjudication of asylum

Appeal asylum

Asylum agreements

How to apply for political asylum

Iraqi refugees and immigrants from Iraq holding work Visas in the US will experience many challenges in the coming years

Additional challenges will be faced by immigrants from Iraq that intend to live and work in the US. GAO issued a report on Iraqi refugees and special immigrant visa holders. GAO analyzed data on Iraqi refugees and SIV holders in the United States, and laws and regulations on the benefits afforded to them. More data of long term positive or negative benefits will be examined this year.

Refugees and immigration

Central American Refugees

Syrian Refugees

Refugees for Immigrants from Iraq holding work visas

How to Apply for Asylum?

To be eligible for asylum in the United States, you must ask for asylum at a port-of-entry (airport, seaport or border crossing), or file an application within one year of your arrival in the United States. You may ask later than one year if conditions in your country have changed or if your personal circumstances have changed within the past year prior to your asking for asylum, and those changes of circumstances affected your eligibility for asylum. You may also be excused from the one year deadline if extraordinary circumstance prevented you from filing within the one year period after your arrival, so long as you apply within a reasonable time given those circumstances. You may apply for asylum regardless of your immigration status, meaning that you may apply even if you are illegally in the United States.

In addition, you must qualify for asylum under the definition of “refugee.” Your eligibility will be based on information you provide on your application and during an interview with an Asylum Officer or Immigration Judge. If you have been placed in removal (deportation) proceedings in Immigration Court, an Immigration Judge will hear and decide your case. If you have not been placed in removal proceedings and apply with the BCIS , an Asylum Officer will interview you and decide whether you are eligible for asylum. Asylum Officers will grant asylum, deny asylum or refer the case to an Immigration Judge for a final decision. If an Asylum Officer finds that you are not eligible for asylum and you are in the United States illegally, the Asylum Officer will place you in removal proceedings and refer your application to an Immigration Judge for a final decision. Immigration Judges also decide on removal if an applicant is found ineligible for asylum and is illegally in the United States. If you are in valid immigrant or nonimmigrant status and the Asylum Officer finds that you are not eligible for asylum, the Asylum Officer will send you a notice explaining that the BCIS intends to deny your request for asylum. You will be given an opportunity to respond to that notice before a decision is made on your application.


There are numerous immigration laws that could result in the denial of this visa if not properly prepared.  If the petition is put together correctly and professionally by a qualified immigration law firm, the chances of approval is greatly increased.

Adjudication of asylum

Appeal asylum

Asylum Applicants

Immigrant children can apply for asylum

CA6 Finds IJ Has Authority to Determine Frivolousness of a Time-Barred Asylum Application

The court finds that Immigration Judges have the authority to make a frivolousness finding in the context of a time-barred asylum application. The court denies the petition for review. (Ghazali v. Holder, 10/29/09).

Asylum application

False asylum application

Frivolous asylum application

Changes in asylum application

EOIR to Open Immigration Court in the Northern Mariana Islands

EOIR will open the Saipan Immigration Court in Saipan, Northern Mariana Islands, on 11/30/09. The Saipan Immigration Court will conduct immigration court proceedings for respondents in the Northern Mariana Islands.

Eoir 

Eoir has taken disciplinary action against 16 attorneys

Eoir benchbook

Immigration Law Firm

Changes regarding Information on Immigration Asylum Policies and Issues

Changes were made regarding current policy procedure. Central Florida Chapter met with EOIR on 10/01/09 to discuss current policies and information; immigration asylum clock issues and updated information on office location and policies.

Adjudication of asylum

Appeal asylum

Asylum applicants

Asylum and immigration

Information regarding Asylum, Refugee and Relative petitions to the US to be offered by the Government

In an effort to clarify regulations for those applying for Asylum in the US, the USCIS issued an information collection request on Form I-730, Refugee/Asylee Relative Petition.

Adjudication of asylum

Appeal asylum

Asylum agreements

Immigrant children can get asylum

Crimes of Moral Turpitude

Alien’s conviction for credit card fraud in violation of California Penal Code Sec. 532a(1) was a crime involving moral turpitude. Absent an explicit adverse credibility finding, immigration judge may not require corroboration of alien’s testimony.
Tijani v. Holder – filed March 11, 2010
Cite as 05-70195

Crime involving moral turpitude

Crimes of moral turpitude: what does this mean?

Crimes of moral turpitude and immigration

Can I be deported for this crime?

New Immigration Case about Asylum from Iran

Alien seeking to reopen removal proceedings failed to provide evidence of changed conditions in Iran where proffered evidence recounted generalized conditions in Iran similar to those that existed during alien’s initial asylum hearing and failed to show how alien’s predicament was appreciably different from the dangers faced by her fellow citizens. Failure by Board of Immigration Appeals to give reasons detailing why alien’s affidavit concerning her intent to be politically active in Iran did not present previously unavailable, material evidence was arbitrary, irrational, or contrary to law. Claim based on hatred of Iranians for Americans cannot justify asylum. Even if “westernized” women were a disfavored group of which alien was a member, alien failed to provide evidence of an individualized threat to persecute her, and so she could not establish a well-founded fear of future persecution.
Najmabadi v. Holder – filed March 9, 2010
Cite as 05-72401

Removal proceedings

Deportation and immigration

Deportation proceedings in the US

How to apply for political asylum

New Bankruptcy Case: Attorneys who provide bankruptcy assistance to assisted persons are “debt relief agenc[ies]” under the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005 because “bankruptcy assistance,” by definition, includes services commonly performed by attorneys such as “advice, counsel [or] document preparation.” A debt relief agency violates 11 U.S.C. Sec. 526(a)(4)–which prohibits “debt relief agenc[ies]” from “advis[ing] an assisted person…to incur more debt in contemplation of [filing for bankruptcy]”–only when the impetus of the advice to incur more debt is the expectation of filing for bankruptcy and obtaining the attendant relief, and statute does not broadly prohibit debt relief agencies from discussing covered subjects but merely proscribes affirmative advice to undertake a particular action; provision, narrowly construed, is not impermissibly vague. Requirements in 11 U.S.C. Sec. 528 that debt relief agencies disclose in their advertisements for certain services that the services are with respect to or may involve bankruptcy relief, and that they identify themselves as debt relief agencies, were not unconstitutional as applied to attorneys because requirements were reasonably related to government’s interest in preventing consumer deception where they were intended to combat the problem of inherently misleading commercial advertisements, entailed only an accurate statement of the advertiser’s legal status and the character of the assistance provided, and did not prevent debt relief agencies from conveying additional information through their advertisements.
Milavetz, Gallop & Milavetz, P.A. v. United States – filed March 8, 2010