• Hours & Info

    M-F: 8:00am - 6:00 p.m.
    Sat: 9:00 a.m. - 12:00 p.m.
  • Past Blog Posts

  • https://api.whatsapp.com/send?phone=13104885414

Is there a possibitly to get my husband of 6 yrs legalized? – Immigration – Avvo.com http://ping.fm/WvHcC

Can I travel before 2 months of my H1B expires? – Immigration – Avvo.com http://ping.fm/9cjXq

can i still adjust my status after marrying a US citizen for less than a year even if i already got a social security number? – Immigration – Avvo.com http://ping.fm/MUuES

How a Refugee Processing go?

The U.S. Attorney General has statutory discretionary authority to admit any refugee who is not firmly resettled in a third country, who is determined to be of special humanitarian concern, and who is admissible as an immigrant. The Attorney General has delegated this authority to the Bureau of Citizenship and Immigration Services (INS). In both overseas refugee processing and domestic asylum proceedings, BCIS has the statutory role of being the decision-maker, determining who meets the requirements for refugee status.

Within the BCIS , the Office of International Affairs, Refugee Branch, located in Washington, D.C., is responsible for oversight and management of the entire BCIS overseas U.S. refugee adjudication program. The overseas refugee processing is assigned by geographic location to the three District Offices, which are located in Rome, Mexico City, and Bangkok. The refugee interviews are conducted by BCIS officers, who are stationed in the three overseas district offices and numerous other sub-offices, and by domestic U.S. asylum officers who travel to overseas locations.


There are numerous immigration laws that could result in the denial of this visa if not properly prepared.  If the petition is put together correctly and professionally by a qualified immigration law firm, the chances of approval is greatly increased.

Cuban refugee adjustment act

Bureau of population refugees and migration

Refugees and Immigration

Apply for Asylum

Can I obtain dual Russian-US citizenship? – Immigration – Avvo.com http://ping.fm/WU3EX

Is reckless endangerment of another person a deportable offense? – Immigration – Avvo.com http://ping.fm/TcvCt

Adjustment of Status for Refugee

If you have been a refugee or held asylum status for at least one year, you may be eligible to change your status to that of a permanent resident.

There is a large package that must be prepared and sent to BCIS . A copy of the letter granting you derivative asylee status either on the basis of having been included on the principal’s original asylum application or on the basis of having been the beneficiary of a petition filed by the principal.

Evidence of one year’s physical presence in the United States. Please keep physical presence evidence to an absolute minimum. Evidence might include a letter of employment, a lease, school enrollment records, or similar documentation, which would cover broad periods of time.

If you wish to travel outside of the U.S. (and return) while your application is being processed, you may use Form I-131, Application for Travel Document, to apply for a refugee travel document. More information may be found at Emergency Travel, and How Do I Get a Travel Document.
Each of the above named applications must be complete in its own right. All required documentation must be submitted with each concurrent application.

If you apply for work authorization and do not receive the document within 90 days of filing the application, you may obtain an interim work authorization document. After 90 days have passed, simply present the receipt that shows you have filed Form I-765 at your local office.


There are numerous immigration laws that could result in the denial of this visa if not properly prepared.  If the petition is put together correctly and professionally by a qualified immigration law firm, the chances of approval is greatly increased.

Asylum persecution

Bureau of population refugees and migration

Cuban refugee adjustment act

Find a refugee

can you fix your immigration status if you have a misdemenor and probation? – Immigration – Avvo.com http://ping.fm/U35OC

Immigration Attorneys can now go forward with Domestic Violence Asylum Claims

Attorneys who practice Immigration Law have been somewhat at a standstill for years regarding domestic violence cases as there was no law that gave such people the protection needed. However, the Matter of R_A_ has just been decided in favor of the person who was abused via domestic violence. Senator Leahy has issued a statement regarding this case which is right on point. It shows how domestic violence cases will now get the protection of U.S. asylum laws. His memo follows:

CONTACT: Office of Senator Leahy, 202-224-4242 VERMONT
Leahy Praises Resolution In Alvarado Asylum Case,
Pushes Administration To Issue Regulations

WASHINGTON (Tuesday, Dec. 15, 2009) – Senator Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) Tuesday praised the conclusion of a 14-year legal struggle that has resulted in the United States granting asylum to a domestic abuse survivor from Guatemala.  Last week, an immigration judge granted asylum to Ms. Rody Alvarado, who fled to the United States in the 1990s seeking protection under the nation’s asylum laws.

“The details of Ms. Alvarado’s case are shocking,” said Leahy.  “She suffered from horrific domestic violence in her home country of Guatemala, and sought protection in the United States under our asylum laws.  Because persecution of this type had not previously been recognized as a basis for refugee or asylum protection, Ms. Alvarado was forced to fight a long legal battle to win her case.”
Ms. Alvarado fled her native Guatemala in 1995 to seek asylum in the United States as a result of sexual and domestic violence committed by her husband.  Guatemalan police failed to intervene in the domestic violence despite the fact that Ms. Alvarado reported the crimes on five separate occasions.  As a result, Ms. Alvarado came to the United States seeking protection under asylum laws.
Leahy continued, “The administrations of three different presidents – Clinton, Bush and Obama
– have grappled with how to handle gender-based asylum claims, but the resolution of this case brings us closer to the end of this journey.  Ms. Alvarado can finally feel safe here in the United States, because she is no longer at risk of being deported to Guatemala.  The Obama administration must now issue regulations to ensure that other victims of domestic violence whose abuse rises to the level of persecution can obtain the same protection as refugees or asylees.”
Through three administrations, Leahy pressed five Attorneys General and three Homeland Security Secretaries to intervene in Ms. Alvarado’s case.  In a statement Friday, Leahy urged the Obama administration to issue binding regulations to address further gender-based asylum claims.

“The Obama administration has laid out a welcomed, new policy in its legal briefs in this case, and I thank the President, Secretary Napolitano, and Attorney General Holder for bringing this case to such a positive resolution.  Yet, the administration’s work is not done.  It must issue binding regulations so that asylum seekers whose cases have been held in limbo for years can also be resolved and that future cases are not delayed in adjudication.”

The full text of Leahy’s statement follows.

# # #

Leahy Praises Resolution In Alvarado Asylum Case, Pushes Administrati… http://leahy.senate.gov/press/200912/121509b.html
1 of 3 12/16/2009 9:51 AM
AILA InfoNet Doc. No. 09121662.  (Posted 12/16/09)

Statement Of Senator Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.),
Chairman, Senate Judiciary Committee,
On The Case of Ms. Rody Alvarado
December 15, 2009

I am pleased to learn that, after 14 years of legal struggle, Ms. Rody Alvarado has finally received asylum in the United States.  The details of Ms. Alvarado’s case are shocking.  She suffered from horrific domestic violence in her home country of Guatemala, and sought protection in the United States under our asylum laws.  Because persecution of this type had not previously been recognized as a basis for refugee or asylum protection, Ms. Alvarado was forced to fight a long legal battle to win her case.

The administrations of three different presidents – Clinton, Bush and Obama – have grappled with how to handle gender-based asylum claims, but the resolution of this case brings us closer to the end of this journey.  Ms. Alvarado can finally feel safe here in the United States, because she is no longer at risk of being deported to Guatemala.  The Obama administration must now issue regulations to ensure that other victims of domestic violence whose abuse rises to the level of persecution can obtain the same protection as refugees or asylees.

Ms. Alvarado fled Guatemala in 1995 after being beaten daily and raped repeatedly by her husband.  When she became pregnant, but refused to terminate her pregnancy, her husband kicked her repeatedly in the lower spine.   Ms. Alvarado had previously tried to escape the abuse, seeking protection in another part of Guatemala, but her husband tracked her down and threatened to kill her if she left their home again.  We know that Ms. Alvarado notified Guatemalan police at least five separate times, but the police refused to respond, telling her that her desperate situation was a domestic dispute that needed to be settled at home.

Over the past 14 years, Ms. Alvarado’s case has been considered by immigration judges, the Board of Immigration Appeals, and three different Attorneys General.  Throughout this extensive consideration, the core facts of her case have never been disputed.  All parties have agreed that Ms. Alvarado suffered extreme abuse at the hands of her husband, and that the Guatemalan government would not protect her.  All parties agreed that she has a well-founded fear that she would be abused again if she was forced to return to Guatemala.

The dispute in Ms. Alvarado’s case centered on whether the abuse she suffered was persecution under the terms of the Refugee Convention and applicable U.S. law.  To obtain protection in the United States, an asylum seeker must demonstrate that they have a well-founded fear of persecution based on race, religion, nationality, political opinion, or membership in a particular social group.

I first wrote to Attorney General Janet Reno in December 1999, when the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) reversed Ms. Alvarado’s grant of asylum, concluding that her abuse was not persecution on account of membership in a particular social group.  This decision was particularly troubling because it left unclear what grounds, if any, could be applied to a victim of severe domestic abuse who cannot obtain the protection of her country of origin.  I wrote to Attorney General Reno again in February and September 2000 asking her to exercise her authority to review the case, called Matter of R-A-, and to reverse the BIA’s decision.
Unfortunately, the case was not reversed at that time, and it then languished for years.  I wrote to Attorney General Ashcroft in June 2004 asking him to work with the Department of Leahy Praises Resolution In Alvarado Asylum Case, Pushes Administrati… http://leahy.senate.gov/press/200912/121509b.html
2 of 3 12/16/2009 9:51 AM
AILA InfoNet Doc. No. 09121662.  (Posted 12/16/09)
Homeland Security (DHS) to issue regulations to govern cases such as Ms. Alvarado’s and to then decide her case in accordance with such rules.  When he was a nominee to be Attorney General in January 2005, I asked Mr. Alberto Gonzales to commit to taking up the case and resolving it if he was confirmed.  Mr. Gonzales promised to work with DHS to finalize regulations, but did not take any action during his years as Attorney General.

Ten years after I and other members of Congress first sought appropriate action and the fair resolution of this case, we celebrate the long-overdue outcome.  While I dismayed at the length of time Ms. Alvarado has lived with fear and uncertainty, the final resolution of this case gives me hope that abuse victims like Ms. Alvarado who meet the other conditions of asylum will be able to find safety in the United States.

The Obama administration has laid out a welcomed, new policy in its legal briefs in this case, and I thank the President, Secretary Napolitano, and Attorney General Holder for bringing this case to such a positive resolution.  Yet, the administration’s work is not done.  It must issue binding regulations so that asylum seekers whose cases have been held in limbo for years can also be resolved and that future cases are not delayed in adjudication.  I urge the administration to immediately initiate a process of notice and comment rulemaking so that asylum seekers,
practitioners, and other experts can contribute to the formulation of new rules.

Today, I commend Ms. Alvarado on the courage she has demonstrated over for many years while seeking protection in the United States.  I congratulate her and wish her all the best as she finally experiences true freedom from persecution and the full scope of liberties enjoyed by Americans.

# # #

Leahy Praises Resolution In Alvarado Asylum Case, Pushes Administrati… http://leahy.senate.gov/press/200912/121509b.html
3 of 3 12/16/2009 9:51 AM
AILA InfoNet Doc. No. 09121662.  (Posted 12/16/09)

Domestic worker

Domestic violence

Victims of domestic violence

UT and VAWA changes for those who are victims of sex trafficking crimes and domestic violence

What is Refugee?

Prior to 1980, departure from communist-dominated or communist-occupied states, or departure from countries in the Middle East, was generally sufficient justification for refugee eligibility. Until this time, U.S. refugee policy was dominated by Cold War geopolitical concerns and strategies. The Refugee Act of 1980 sought to eliminate the prevailing geographic and ideological preferences and to emphasize that persecution, not provenance, was to be the basis for determining refugee eligibility.

The Refugee Act formally incorporated into U.S. law the international definition of refugee contained in the 1951 United Nations Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol. A refugee is defined as a person outside of his or her country of nationality who is unable or unwilling to return because of persecution or a well-founded fear of persecution on account of race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group, or political opinion. By Presidential Determination certain refugees may be processed while still in their countries of origin (Cuba, Vietnam, and the former Soviet Union). While in-country processing was designed to be an exceptional remedy to refugees of compelling need, a large percentage of all refugees admitted to the United States have been processed in-country.

Under U.S. law, a person who has committed acts of persecution, or has assisted in the commission of persecution in any way, on account of race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group, or political opinion, is not eligible for classification as a refugee.


There are numerous immigration laws that could result in the denial of this visa if not properly prepared.  If the petition is put together correctly and professionally by a qualified immigration law firm, the chances of approval is greatly increased.

Bureau of population refugees and migration

Central american refugees

Refugee and asylee follow to join cases

How to apply for political asylum