• Hours & Info

    (562) 495-0554
    M-F: 8:00am - 6:00 p.m.
    Sat: 9:00 a.m. - 12:00 p.m.
  • Past Blog Posts

  • https://api.whatsapp.com/send?phone=13104885414

Video: What is the difference between ‘Inadmissibility’ and ‘deportability’ – Avvo.com http://ping.fm/yI2rJ

The Supreme Court has spoken: BLAKE is not the Law. 212(c) available.

Video: The Supreme Court has spoken: BLAKE is not the Law. 212(c) available. – Avvo.com http://ping.fm/5NpkG

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/212c/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/212c-waiver-application/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/%c2%a7212c/

https://californiaimmigration.us/bia-on-ina-%c2%a7-212h-waiver-eligibility-for-alien-found-inadmissible-based-on-drug-paraphernalia-offense/

Video: The Supreme Court has spoken: BLAKE is not the Law. 212(c) available. – Avvo.com http://ping.fm/5NpkG

BALCA Excuses Noncompliance with §655.10(a)(2) Due to H-2B PWD Delay

BALCA vacated the denial where the employer made every effort to comply with §655.10(a)(2) but was simply unable to file its application in time for its season as a result of the NPWC’s delay in issuing the PWD.

https://atomic-temporary-10880024.wpcomstaging.com/tag/h-2b/

https://atomic-temporary-10880024.wpcomstaging.com/tag/h-2b-cap/

https://atomic-temporary-10880024.wpcomstaging.com/tag/h-2b-petitions/

https://californiaimmigration.us/visas/h-2b-temporary-worker/

BIA Finds NTA Without Hearing Date Triggers “Stop-Time” Rule

The Board found that any period of continuous residence or continuous physical presence ends upon service of an NTA on the alien, even if the NTA does not include the date and time of the initial hearing.

https://atomic-temporary-10880024.wpcomstaging.com/tag/bia-2/

https://atomic-temporary-10880024.wpcomstaging.com/tag/bia-3/

https://atomic-temporary-10880024.wpcomstaging.com/tag/appeal-to-bia/

https://californiaimmigration.us/bia-deference-given-to-particulary-serious-crime/

BIA Says Adjustment under Cuban Refugee Adjustment Act Is an Admission

The Board found the respondent was admitted to the U.S. when he adjusted status under the Cuban Adjustment Act, and was thus subject to removal under INA § 237(a) following a drug trafficking conviction.

https://atomic-temporary-10880024.wpcomstaging.com/tag/bia-2/

https://atomic-temporary-10880024.wpcomstaging.com/tag/bia/

https://atomic-temporary-10880024.wpcomstaging.com/wp-admin/term.php?taxonomy=post_tag&tag_ID=363145778&post_type=post&wp_http_referer=%2Fwp-admin%2Fedit-tags.php%3Ftaxonomy%3Dpost_tag%26post_type%3Dpost%26s%3DBIA

https://californiaimmigration.us/bia-deference-given-to-particulary-serious-crime/

DOJ Announces Settlement in U.S. Citizen Discrimination Case

DOJ press release announcing a settlement agreement between S.W.J.J. Inc., or Sernak Farms, to settle allegations that Sernak discriminated by preferring to hire H-2A temporary visa holders over U.S. citizen applicants.

https://atomic-temporary-10880024.wpcomstaging.com/tag/h-2a/

https://atomic-temporary-10880024.wpcomstaging.com/tag/h-2a-and-the-h-2b-nonimmigrant-worker-programs/

https://atomic-temporary-10880024.wpcomstaging.com/tag/h-2a-temporary-visa-holders/

https://californiaimmigration.us/regulations-on-agricultural-employment-visa-h-2a-will-receive-a-final-ruling-of-it%e2%80%99s-amended-regulation/

White House Promotes Pathways for Immigrant Entrepreneurs

Blog from the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy encourages candidates to apply for USCIS Entrepreneurs in Residence (EIR). EIR is part of the White House’s “Start Up America” initiative designed to celebrate, inspire, and accelerate U.S. entrepreneurship.

https://atomic-temporary-10880024.wpcomstaging.com/tag/eir/

https://atomic-temporary-10880024.wpcomstaging.com/tag/entrepreneurs-in-residence/

https://atomic-temporary-10880024.wpcomstaging.com/tag/immigrationlawyer/

https://californiaimmigration.us/our-immigration-law-firm/

CA7 Finds Actual Reliance on §212(c), Remands for Hearing

The court refused to apply the repeal of INA §212(c) retroactively to Petitioner, where he demonstrated actual reliance on the availability of a §212(c) waiver by affirmatively abandoning his right to pursue a JRAD.

CA5 on Requiring Corroborating Evidence from Asylum Applicants

The court held that the BIA reasonably interpreted its own regulations in Matter of S-M-J- when ruling asylum applicants can be required to provide reasonably obtainable corroborating evidence even when their testimony is credible.