CA5 on Requiring Corroborating Evidence from Asylum Applicants
The court held that the BIA reasonably interpreted its own regulations in Matter of S-M-J- when ruling asylum applicants can be required to provide reasonably…
The court held that the BIA reasonably interpreted its own regulations in Matter of S-M-J- when ruling asylum applicants can be required to provide reasonably…
The court found that termination of asylum under 8 CFR §208.24 does not “mark the consummation of a decision-making process” and is therefore, not a…
The court found that where a state criminal statute covers both the felony and misdemeanor conduct proscribed by 21 USC §841, it is presumed to…