The court held that the BIA reasonably interpreted its own regulations in Matter of S-M-J- when ruling asylum applicants can be required to provide reasonably obtainable corroborating evidence even when their testimony is credible.
Filed under: Immigration Attorney | Tagged: Asylum Applicants, Atty.Brian D. Lerner, BIA, CA5, Corroborating Evidence, Immigration Lawyer |
Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:
You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. ( Log Out / Change )
You are commenting using your Twitter account. ( Log Out / Change )
You are commenting using your Facebook account. ( Log Out / Change )
You are commenting using your Google+ account. ( Log Out / Change )
Connecting to %s
Blog at WordPress.com. WP Designer.