The court remanded the asylum case of a Falun Gong practitioner, finding that the evidence established that the petitioner was subject to a well-founded fear of persecution on return to China. (Qiu v. Holder, 7/12/10)
Filed under: asylum, Falun Gong Practitioner, Immigration Attorney, Immigration Court, Immigration Lawyer | Tagged: asylum, Brian D. Lerner, Falun Gong Practitioner, Immigration Attorney, Immigration Lawyer, Law Offices of Brian D. Lerner, USCIS | Leave a comment »
The court denied petition for review in asylum case and directed a copy of the opinion to the Wisconsin Office of Lawyer Regulation, finding a lack of evidence of diligent efforts on counsel’s part to meet multiple court deadlines. (Umezurike v. Holder, 7/9/10)
Filed under: asylum, Attorney's Failure to meet deadlines, Immigration Attorney, Immigration Court, Immigration Lawyer, USCIS | Tagged: asylum, Attorney's Failure to meet deadlines, Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Attorney, Immigration Lawyer, Law Offices of Brian D. Lerner | Leave a comment »
The court held that the BIA interpretation of §1003.(d)(3) in In re A-S-B- cannot stand and that an IJ’s forecasting of future events constitutes fact-finding that the BIA must review under the clearly erroneous standard. (Huang v. U.S. Att’y Gen., 9/8/10)
Filed under: asylum, BIA, Immigration Attorney, Immigration Court, Immigration Lawyer | Tagged: asylum, BIA, Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Attorney, Immigration Lawyer, Law Offices of Brian D. Lerner, USCIS | Leave a comment »
Board of Immigration Appeals erred as a matter of law in ruling aliens seeking discretionary relief can never demonstrate “exceptional circumstances.” Deciding whether exceptional circumstances are present requires a consideration of all facts in a specific case, including but not limited to the probability of the petitioner obtaining relief. Where petitioner began asylum process in 1996 and diligently pursued his claim but missed a hearing because he was traveling and his attorney was not immediately able to contact him and obtain consent to the entry of a representative appearance, petitioner was entitled to recision of his in absentia deportation order due to these extraordinary circumstances. Vukmirovic v. Holder – filed September 8, 2010
Filed under: asylum, BIA, Immigration Attorney, Immigration Lawyer, USCIS | Tagged: asylum, BIA, Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Attorney, Immigration Lawyer, Law Offices of Brian D. Lerner | 1 Comment »
1) A determination that an alien has filed a frivolous application for asylum, pursuant to section 208(d)(6) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1158(d)(6)(2006), can be made in the absence of a final decision on the merits of the asylum application. (2) Withdrawal of an alien âs asylum application after the required warnings and safeguards have been provided does not preclude a finding that the application is frivolous.
Filed under: asylum | Tagged: asylum, Brian D. Lerner, Frivolous Application for Asylum, Immigration Attorney, Immigration Lawyer, Law Offices of Brian D. Lerner | Leave a comment »
The basics of applying for Asylum – Avvo.com http://ping.fm/GNDE3
Filed under: asylum | Tagged: asylee, asylum, Asylum Applicants, Asylum Application, asylum attorney, frivolous asylum application, Immigration, Immigration Attorney, Immigration Lawyer | Leave a comment »
Denial of application for asylum was not error because substantial evidence supported conclusion by immigration judge and Board of Immigration Appeals that harassment of South Vietnamese refugees in Italy by unknown assailants–which petitioners attributed to communists–was not committed either by the Italian government or by forces that government was unable or unwilling to control.
Truong v. Holder
People seeking asylum into the U.S
Filed under: asylum | Tagged: asylee, asylum, Asylum Applicants, Asylum Application, asylum attorney, asylum officer, asylum petition, california asylum attorney, Immigration, Immigration Attorney, Immigration Lawyer | Leave a comment »
NINTH U.S. CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS
-Immigration Law-
Where petitioner’s testimony that he was persecuted in Ghana on account of his attempts to convert Muslims to the Baptist faith was deemed credible, Board of Immigration Appeals erred in concluding that he failed to show authorities were unable or unwilling to control his attackers. Remand was required as to petitioner’s asylum claim where he demonstrated past persecution, and it was unclear whether the BIA placed the requisite burden of proof on the government to show that petitioner could, if returned to Ghana, safely relocate within the country and that it would be reasonable for him to do so.
Afriyie v. Holder – filed July 26, 2010
Cite as 08-72626
Full text http://ping.fm/dgkDc
-Immigration Law-
Where petitioner testified that he was persecuted first in Iran by the government on account of his political activity and later in the Netherlands by Muslim extremists on account of his conversion to Christianity, substantial evidence supported immigration judge’s denial of asylum from and withholding of removal to the Netherlands, even though judge deemed petitioner’s testimony credible, because petitioner who failed to show that Dutch authorities were unable or unwilling to control his attackers did not show that he suffered past persecution in the Netherlands and that his fear of future persecution was objectively reasonable.
Rahimzadeh v. Holder.
Filed under: asylum | Tagged: asylee, asylum, Asylum Applicants, Asylum Application, asylum attorney, asylum officer, asylum petition, Immigration, Immigration Attorney, Immigration Lawyer, Refugee and Asylee follow-to-Join cases | Leave a comment »
A new case on Asylum: Where petitioner’s testimony that he was persecuted in Ghana on account of his attempts to convert Muslims to the Baptist faith was deemed credible, Board of Immigration Appeals erred in concluding that he failed to show authorities were unable or unwilling to control his attackers. Remand was required as to petitioner’s asylum claim where he demonstrated past persecution, and it was unclear whether the BIA placed the requisite burden of proof on the government to show that petitioner could, if returned to Ghana, safely relocate within the country and that it would be reasonable for him to do so.
Afriyie v. Holder
How to apply for political asylum
Filed under: asylum | Tagged: asylum, asylum 2.0, Asylum Applicants, Asylum Application, asylum attorney, asylum officer, asylum petition, california asylum attorney, frivolous asylum application, Immigration, Immigration Attorney, Immigration Lawyer, los angeles asylum attorney, united states asylum attorney | Leave a comment »
Alien’s inability to speak English, detention for two months in an immigration detention center, and transfer of his case after he moved from Arizona to California failed to explain how alien was prevented from filing an asylum application within one year of his arrival and did not constitute “extraordinary circumstances,” individually or collectively, justifying alien’s untimely filing.
Toj-Culpatan v. Holder – filed December 1, 2009,.
Filed under: asylum | Tagged: asylee, asylum, asylum 2.0, Asylum Applicants, Asylum Application, asylum attorney, asylum officer, asylum petition, Immigration, Immigration Attorney, Immigration Lawyer | Leave a comment »
Immigration Lawyer
Brian D. Lerner Immigration Attorney & Deportation Lawyer Blog 