Posted on December 2, 2016 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney
In a precedent decision issued today, the BIA clarified Matter of Vo, holding that, within the jurisdiction of the Ninth Circuit, a returning lawful permanent resident (LPR) who has a felony conviction for solicitation to possess marijuana for sale is an arriving alien who is inadmissible under INA §212(a)(2)(A)(i)(I) for having committed a crime of moral turpitude (CIMT), even though that section of the INA refers only to attempt and conspiracy to commit a CIMT.
BIA deference given to particulary serious crime
Filed under: BIA | Tagged: #bia, ;bia, appeal to bia, BIA, bia board of immigration appeals, BIA Pro Bono Project, cimt, crime of moral turpitude, Motion to Reopen with the BIA, possesion of marijuuana | Leave a comment »
Posted on December 2, 2016 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney
This U.S. News and World Report article reports that the U.S. Supreme Court will hear arguments on Wednesday over whether immigrants facing deportation can be detained indefinitely for months or even years without a hearing. The case, Jennings v. Rodriguez, could have broad implications for President-elect Donald Trump’s proposals to step up immigration enforcement and ramp up deportations. If the respondents prevail, the Supreme Court could require mandatory bond hearings for detained immigrants nationwide. If the government wins, however, tens of thousands of people could be exposed to potentially indefinite periods of immigration detention.
Attack on immigrants
Central American Immigrants
Immigrant questions
Information regarding filing complaints of discrimination, civil rights violations and racial profiling towards immigrants
Filed under: immigrants | Tagged: Detention, Immigration, Immigration Attorney, immigration detention, Immigration Law, Immigration Lawyer, indefinite detention | Leave a comment »
Posted on December 2, 2016 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney
BALCA reversed the Certifying Officer’s denial and remanded the matter for certification where DOL had faulted the employer for not listing a relocation requirement in recruitment advertising and on the ETA Form 9089 for a position with a primary work site “and various unanticipated locations throughout the U.S.” The employer had relied on the 1994 Barbara Farmer Memo, which BALCA agreed makes no distinction between travel and relocation. BALCA further opined that it was not fundamentally fair to require that the possibility of relocation be specifically disclosed in the advertisement and application in absence of notice or guidance, particularly when the organized immigration bar has been pressing OFLC for years to clarify issues related to “roving” employees.
DUE process
Violation of DUE process
Denial of DUE process
DUE and immigration
https://californiaimmigration.us/victory-for-due-process-of-aliens/
Filed under: due process | Tagged: 9089, BALCA, Certifying Officer, CO, denial of due process, Due Process, Immigration, Immigration Attorney, Immigration Law, Immigration Lawyer, Labor Certification, PERM, Victory for Due Process, violation of due process | Leave a comment »
Posted on December 2, 2016 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney
USCIS issued a policy memorandum designating Matter of L-S-M- as an AAO adopted decision, which establishes this decision as policy guidance that applies to and binds all USCIS employees. Matter of L-S-M- clarifies that INA §240B(d)(2), which provides an exception for certain victims of domestic violence or related abuse to the civil penalties in INA §240B(d)(1) for failure to comply with an order of voluntary departure, does not extend to U-1 nonimmigrant victims of qualifying criminal activity.
Voluntary departure
Grant stay of voluntary departure
Post conclusion voluntary departure
Find a good Immigration Lawyer to help you
https://californiaimmigration.us/removal/judicial-review/
Filed under: Immigration Attorney | Tagged: Grant Stay of Voluntary Departure, Immigration, Immigration Attorney, Immigration Law, Immigration Lawyer, Post-conclusion Voluntary Departure, Review the denial of Voluntary Departure, victims of domestic violence, Voluntary Departure | Leave a comment »
Posted on December 2, 2016 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney
USCIS advised stakeholders that, effective December 18, 2015, H-2B workers identified as “returning workers” are exempted from the FY2016 annual H-2B cap of 66,000 visas, pursuant to the 2016 Consolidated Appropriations Act (Public Law 114-113). H-2B employers are urged to identify “returning workers” when filing petitions.
H-2B Cap
H-2B visa process
H-2B Countries
H-1B Temporary worker application
Filed under: H-2B | Tagged: H-2A, H-2B, h-2b cap, H-2B Cap Count, H-2B Cap Count for FY2011, h-2b countries, h-2b list, H-2B Petitions, H-2B Program, Immigration, Immigration Attorney, Immigration Law, Immigration Lawyer, returning workers | Leave a comment »
Posted on December 2, 2016 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney
In a precedent decision issued today, the BIA held that the crime of endangering the welfare of a child in violation of §260.10(1) of the New York Penal Law, which requires knowingly acting in a manner likely to be injurious to the physical, mental, or moral welfare of a child, is categorically a “crime of child abuse, child neglect, or child abandonment” under INA §237(a)(2)(E)(i).
Board of immigration appeals
Appeal to BIA
BIA and immigration
BIA deference given to particulary serious crime
Filed under: BIA | Tagged: BIA, bia board of immigration appeals, BIA Pro Bono Project, board of immigration appeals, categorical analysis, child abuse, cmt, Immigration, Immigration Attorney, Immigration Law, Immigration Lawyer | Leave a comment »
Posted on December 2, 2016 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney
CBP announced that it is setting up a temporary holding facility adjacent to the Donna-Rio Bravo International Bridge in Donna, Texas, to provide additional capacity for unaccompanied children and family units in CBP custody at Ports of Entry and U.S. Border Patrol stations in the South Texas area. The temporary site can currently hold up to 500 people, but CBP stated that it will regularly assess whether to expand this facility or keep it operational based on the number of people arriving in the area.
CBP meaning
Customs and border protection
CBP Liaison
CBP and immigration
https://californiaimmigration.us/change-in-cbp-policy-on-deferred-inspection-of-legal-permanent-residents-with-criminal-convictions-%e2%80%93-october-1-2009/
Filed under: CBP - Customs & Border Protection | Tagged: cbp, CBP Liaison, child detention, Customs & Border Protection (CBP), Customs and Border Protection (CBP), Detention, holding facility, Immigration, Immigration Attorney, Immigration Lawyer, immunity of cbp agents, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) | Leave a comment »
Posted on December 2, 2016 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney
Where the Cuban respondent was paroled into the United States on August 25, 1980, as part of the Mariel Boatlift with an Arrival/Departure Record (Form I-94) stamped “Cuban/Haitian Entrant (Status Pending)” indicating that the purpose of his parole was for “Cuban Asylum,” the BIA held in a precedent decision issued today that the respondent was ineligible to adjust his status under INA §209, because he did not establish that he was either admitted as a “refugee” within the meaning of INA §207 or granted asylum under INA §208.
I-94 form
I-94 form application
BIA and immigration
BIA deference given to particulary serious crime
Filed under: I-94 | Tagged: adjust, AOS, cuban parole, I-94, I-94 Forms, Immigration, Immigration Attorney, Immigration Court, Immigration Law, Immigration Lawyer | 1 Comment »
Posted on December 2, 2016 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney
ICE provided FAQs on an agreement between USCIS and ICE that establishes a process for updating fingerprint checks on non-detained respondents with cases pending before EOIR whose fingerprints have been taken, but whose fingerprint checks will expire prior to a final decision by EOIR (i.e., the checks are more than 15 months old).
Filed under: fingerprint | Tagged: EOIR, fingerprint, fingerprint requirements, fingerprints, ICE, Immigration, Immigration Attorney, Immigration Law, Immigration Lawyer | Leave a comment »
Brian D. Lerner Immigration Attorney & Deportation Lawyer Blog 