• Hours & Info

    (562) 495-0554
    M-F: 8:00am - 6:00 p.m.
    Sat: 9:00 a.m. - 12:00 p.m.
  • Past Blog Posts

  • https://api.whatsapp.com/send?phone=13104885414

Petitioner ineligible for AOS for presenting US Birth Certificate and continuous Physical Presence ing a U.S. birth certificate

The court found Petitioner ineligible for AOS for presenting a U.S. birth certificate in attempting to enter, and ineligible for cancellation because physical presence was interrupted when he withdrew his application for admission. (Valadez-Munoz v. Holder, 10/28/10)

Petitioner ineligible for AOS for presenting US Birth Certificate and continuous Physical Presence in a U.S. birth certificate

The court found Petitioner ineligible for AOS for presenting a U.S. birth certificate in attempting to enter, and ineligible for cancellation because physical presence was interrupted when he withdrew his application for admission. (Valadez-Munoz v. Holder, 10/28/10)

H-2A Petitioners on prohibited fees

Petitioner to pursue an argument never presented to the BIA

Petitioner

Sibling Petition Summary

Robbery under CA Penal Code §211 is a crime involving moral turpitude

The court found reasonable the BIA’s determination that robbery under Cal. Penal Code §211 is a crime involving moral turpitude for purposes of INA §212(a)(2)(A)(i)(I). (Mendoza v. Holder, 10/27/10)

crime involving moral turpitude

crime of moral turpitude

Crimes of Moral Turpitude

Multiple Laws Exist to Make You Removable

 

Conditional parolee not eligible for adjustment of status

The court held that an alien released on conditional parole under INA §236 is not “paroled into the United States” for purposes of eligibility for adjustment of status under INA §245. (Delgado-Sobalvarro v. Att’y Gen. of the U.S., 11/2/10)

Adjustment of Status

Conditional parolee not eligible for adjustment of status

AOS

Misdemeanor false imprisonment in violation of CA Penal Code §236

The court held that misdemeanor false imprisonment in violation of Cal. Penal Code §236 is not categorically a crime involving moral turpitude. (Saavedra-Figueroa v. Holder, 11/5/10)

Misdemeanor false imprisonment in violation of CA Penal Code §236

crime involving moral turpitude

crime of moral turpitude

Wins

The court dismissed Petitioner’s claim as administratively unexhausted

The court dismissed Petitioner’s claim as administratively unexhausted, but implored its colleagues that when a similar case is next presented, to hold that slight tardiness to one’s hearing does not qualify as a failure to appear. (Camaj v. Holder, 11/8/10)

Failure to Appear

Immigration Attorney

inland empire immigration attorney

BIA Remands Case Where Defendant Appeals In Absentia Order

Decision to deny administrative closure

The court held that the decision to deny administrative closure is a procedural ruling which the court may review under an abuse of discretion standard to determine whether Petitioner has received a full and fair hearing. (Vahora v. Holder, 11/15/10)

administrative closure

Motion for Administrative Closure

Decision to deny administrative closure

deportation-attorney helps clients in U.S.

Source of the children’s support in the event of Petitioner’s deportation

The court remanded where the IJ and BIA assumed that the father of Petitioner’s children would remain a source of the children’s support in the event of Petitioner’s deportation, and ignored the possibility of the father’s deportation. (Champion v. Holder, 11/22/10)

USC Father

BIA

bia board of immigration appeals

Victory for Due Process of Aliens

Failure to register as a sex offender

The court remanded to determine whether failure to register as a sex offender in violation of Wisconsin Statute §301.45(2)(a) is a crime involving moral turpitude under the analysis set forth inMatter of Silva-Trevino. (Mata-Guerrero v. Holder, 11/24/10)

Failure to register as a sex offender

Registered Sex Offenders

Violation of Wisconsin Statute §301.45(2)(a)

The Walsh Waiver. What to do to try to get it approved.

Derivative Citizenship

The court held that for purposes of derivative citizenship under former INA §321(a), the phrase “begins to reside permanently in the United States while under the age of 18 years” requires the status of a lawful permanent resident. (U.S. v. Forey-Quintero, 11/30/10)

Derivative Citizenship

“Derivative Citizenship” under former INA §321(a)

Derivative Citizenship Case

I am a US citizen who meets the derived citizenship requirements but can not prove residency.