Posted on July 13, 2010 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney
Posted on July 13, 2010 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney
VAWA:
For C/R in court – the hardship to show is a)much less than C/R regular applications AND you can show hardship to relatives and victim.
VAWA self-petition
VAWA facts
Battered or abused parent
VAWA – victims
Filed under: VAWA | Tagged: Immigration, Immigration Attorney, Immigration Lawyer, VAWA, vawa attorney, vawa lawyer | Leave a comment »
Posted on July 13, 2010 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney
A New win for Law Offices of Brian D. Lerner: Client was in deportation because no proof of I-94 entry to U.S. We provided declarations, etc. and applied for Cancellation of Removal and now he has his Green Card.
Form I-94
Arrival/departure record
Removal proceedings
A deportation attorney is very important for you
Filed under: I-94 | Tagged: I-94, I-94 Forms, Immigration, Immigration Attorney, Immigration Lawyer, los angeles immigration | Leave a comment »
Posted on July 13, 2010 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney
Posted on July 12, 2010 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney
The government filed a Memorandum in Opposition to Motion for Preliminary Injunction in Broadgate, Inc.,et al v. USCIS, a case challenging the January 8, 2010, employer-employee/third-party placement memo.
33.767524
-118.189993
Filed under: Employer-Employee/Third-Party, Immigration Attorney, Immigration Lawyer, los angeles immigration attorney, USCIS | Tagged: employer-employee/third-party, Immigration Attorney, Immigration Lawyer, los angeles immigration attorney, USCIS | Leave a comment »
Posted on July 12, 2010 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney
Posted on July 12, 2010 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney
New Case involving modified categorical approach: Under modified categorical approach, bank employee’s guilty plea to stealing, embezzling, and misapplying $65,000 of bank funds in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 656 qualified as an aggravated felony under 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1101(a)(43)(M)(i) because the knowing misapplication of funds necessarily involved fraud.
Carlos-Blaza v. Holder.
Aggravated felony analysis
California felony conviction
Alien convicted of an aggravated felony
Aggravated felony theft offense
Filed under: Aggravated Felonies | Tagged: #aggrvated felony, aggravated felon, Aggravated Felonies, aggravated felony, aggravated felony bar, Immigration, Immigration Attorney, Immigration Lawyer | Leave a comment »
Posted on July 8, 2010 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney
The offense of delivery of a simulated controlled substance in violation of Texas law is not an aggravated felony, as defined by section 101(a)(43)(B) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43)(B) (2006), but it is a violation of a law relating to a controlled substance under former section 241(a)(2)(B)(i) of the Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1251(a)(2)(B)(i) (1994).
33.767524
-118.189993
Filed under: controlled substance, Immigration Attorney, Immigration Lawyer, los angeles immigration attorney, USCIS | Tagged: aggravated felony, controlled substance, Immigration Attorney, Immigration Lawyer, USCIS | Leave a comment »
Posted on July 8, 2010 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney
A new case : Where Chapter 7 debtor, prior to filing petition, assigned its accounts receivable to bank, but account-holder made payments directly to debtor instead of bank, and bankruptcy court later avoided bank’s security interest in a preference action by the trustee, bank was barred from proceeding in a separate action against the account-holder for amounts the account-holder paid to the debtor because the bank did not possess any claim separate and distinct from those which were adjudicated in the bankruptcy proceedings.
Find a good Bankruptcy attorney
Bankruptcy case
Bankruptcy court´s order
File bankruptcy
Filed under: bankruptcy | Tagged: bankruptcy, bankruptcy services, chapter 13 bankruptcy, Immigration, Immigration Attorney, Immigration Lawyer | Leave a comment »
Posted on July 8, 2010 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney
Crimes of Moral Turpitude should be analyzed under 24 I & N DEC 687 (2008). Step 1: – If it is clearly a CMT then the analysis is over; Step 2: Was there a temporary or permanent taking; Step 3: What extrinsic evidence exists (this can be shown); Step 4 – CMT is a non elemental fact. Look at Johnso vs. US (130 S.Ct. 1265 (2010)) or Matter of Milan – 25 De. 197 (BIA 2010).
Charged in violent crimes?
Crimes of moral turpitude
Particular types of crime
Victims of crime
33.767524
-118.189993
Filed under: Crimes of Moral Turpitude | Tagged: Crimes of Moral Turpitude, Immigration Attorney, Immigration Lawyer, los angeles immigration attorney, USCIS | Leave a comment »