Posted on October 19, 2015 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney
The State Department released the Visa Bulletin for November 2015, including the availability of immigrant numbers for “Application Final Action Dates” (indicating when DOS or USCIS can make a decision on the applications) and “Dates for Filing Applications” (indicating when immigrant visa applicants should be notified to submit required documentation). There was no forward movement from the revised October 2015 Visa Bulletin in the “dates for filing” for the family-based, first and third preference categories for Mexico; the employment-based, second preference categories for mainland China and India; or the employment-based, third preference category for the Philippines.
Visa bulletin
Visa bulletin and adjustment of status
Visa bulletin chart
DOS provides Visa bulletin
Filed under: Visa Bulletin | Tagged: Department of State (DOS), DOS, Immigration, Immigration Attorney, Immigration Lawyer, priority date, Visa Bulletin | Leave a comment »
Posted on October 19, 2015 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney
The Ninth Circuit upheld the Board of Immigration Appeals, holding that the failure of a Notice to Appear (NTA) to specify the date and location of a removal hearing has no effect on the stop-time rule. Accordingly, the court found that the petitioner, who had not accrued the requisite period of continuous physical presence by the time he was served with the NTA in his removal proceeding, was statutorily ineligible for cancellation of removal.
https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/defective-nta/
https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/deficient-nta/
https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/nta/
https://californiaimmigration.us/our-immigration-law-firm/
Filed under: NTA | Tagged: Cancellation of Removal, Immigration, Immigration Attorney, Immigration Lawyer, ninth circuit, NTA, Stop-Time Rule | Leave a comment »
Posted on October 19, 2015 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney
Today, CBP released statistics on the number of use of force incidents that occurred between FY2011 and FY2015, broken down by fiscal year. The data, which reflects the application of the use of force by U.S. Border Patrol agents, CBP officers, and air interdiction agents, indicates that there were 768 use of force incidents in FY2015, compared to 1037 such incidents in FY2014.
https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/force-incidents/
https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/immigrationlawyer/
https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/immigrationattorney/
https://californiaimmigration.us/our-immigration-law-firm/
Filed under: force incidents | Tagged: cbp, force from border patrol, force incidents, Immigration, Immigration Attorney, Immigration Lawyer | Leave a comment »
Posted on October 19, 2015 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney
The Eighth Circuit denied the petition for review, finding that the petitioner forfeited his right to a merits hearing on the charge of falsely representing himself as a U.S. citizen in violation of INA §237(a)(3)(D) when he failed to make a timely assertion of that right. As such, the court held that the petitioner’s arguments alleging due process, statutory, and regulatory violations could not prevail.
https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/us-citizen/
https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/claiming-to-be-a-us-citizen/
https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/claim-to-us-citizenship/
https://californiaimmigration.us/us-citizen-is-charged-with-defrauding-foreign-national-employees-that-were-hoping-to-obtain-legal-citizenship/
Filed under: Citizenship | Tagged: claim to usc, claiming to be a us citizen, falsely representation, Immigration, Immigration Attorney, Immigration Lawyer, usc 237 | Leave a comment »
Posted on October 19, 2015 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney
BALCA affirmed the denial of certification where the employer listed the name of the president of the company, but not name of the employer, on the Notice of Filing (NOF). Rejecting the employer’s harmless error argument, BALCA stated that, without the employer’s name in the NOF, “a person attempting to provide information to the Certifying Officer (CO) might not be able to inform the CO of the name of the employer as it appeared on the application.”
https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/perm-2/
https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/denial-of-perm/
https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/conditional-permanent-resident/
https://californiaimmigration.us/green-card/perm-employment-petition-for-immigration/
Filed under: PERM | Tagged: BALCA, Immigration, Immigration Attorney, Immigration Lawyer, Labor Certification, nof, notice of finding, PERM | Leave a comment »
Posted on October 19, 2015 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney
Posted on October 19, 2015 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney
Posted on October 19, 2015 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney
DHS is proposing to amend its F-1 nonimmigrant student visa regulations on optional practical training (OPT) to allow certain F-1 STEM students who have elected to pursue 12 months of OPT in the United States to extend the OPT period by 24 months. An advance copy of the proposed rule is now available. The proposed rule is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on October 19, 2015, and comments will be due 30 days after its publication. On August 12, 2015, the District Court for the District of Columbia vacated the2008 STEM OPT extension rule, but stayed the vacatur until February 12, 2016, to allow DHS the opportunity to reissue the rule with proper notice and comment
https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/dhs-2/
https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/department-of-homeland-security-dhs/
https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/dhs/
https://californiaimmigration.us/dhs-officially-issues-statement-on-2019-public-charge-rule/
Filed under: Department of Homeland Security (DHS) | Tagged: Adoption, DHS, extension opt, Immigration, Immigration Attorney, Immigration Lawyer, stem, stem extension | Leave a comment »
Posted on September 26, 2015 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney
The Sixth Circuit interpreted INA §240 as requiring that personal service be made upon a noncitizen whenever practicable, and held that personal service to a represented noncitizen’s counsel may, in certain cases, constitute personal service to the noncitizen. The court upheld the Board of Immigration Appeals, finding that the respondent, who was ordered removed in absentia after failing to appear at a master calendar hearing in his removal proceedings, had received sufficient notice under the INA, where the respondent’s counsel was personally served with written notice of the hearing on the day that he appeared with the respondent in immigration court
Removal proceedings
Order of removal
Removal or deportation hearings
Cancellation of removal
Filed under: Removal Proceedings | Tagged: 6th circuit, Immigration, Immigration Attorney, Immigration Lawyer, notice to appear, persona service of immigration notice, removability, Removal, removal order, Removal Proceedings, service on attorney, sixth circuit | Leave a comment »
Posted on September 26, 2015 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney
The court upheld USCIS’s finding that the area of extraordinary ability defined by the plaintiff was gymnastics coaching, not gymnastics, and that it was reasonable to find evidence that the beneficiary won an Olympic gold medal in gymnastics insufficient.
The EB-1
EB-1 Petition
EB-1 C
Law Offices of Brian D. Lerner
Filed under: EB-1 | Tagged: EB-1, eb-1a, eb-1c, eb1, extraordinary ability, Immigration, Immigration Attorney, Immigration Lawyer, USCIS | Leave a comment »