• Hours & Info

    (562) 495-0554
    M-F: 8:00am - 6:00 p.m.
    Sat: 9:00 a.m. - 12:00 p.m.
  • Past Blog Posts

  • https://api.whatsapp.com/send?phone=13104885414

In a detention facility?

ICE issued standard operating procedures (SOPs) establishing minimum legal access and legal visitation standards applicable to all ICE Family Residential Centers (FRCs) that are active and operational. The SOPs include information on a pre-screening requirement for the designation of legal visitors and independent medical experts, visits by legal representatives and legal assistants, legal visitation hours, pre-representation meetings, legal visitation privacy, dedicated workspace, materials provided to residents by legal representatives, a pro bono list and resident sign-up, and attorney-client group legal meetings.

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/detention-2/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/detention/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/criminal-detention/

https://californiaimmigration.us/removal/detention-in-deportation-proceedings/

Immigration getting hit because bad treatment upon woman and children

The government to comply with U.S. District Judge Dolly Gee’s July 24, 2015, ruling concerning the inhumane detention of mothers and children fleeing violence and persecution. In a press release, the CARA Family Detention Pro Bono Projectnoted the government’s noncompliance with the ruling, and called on the government to “immediately cease [the] abhorrent practice” of family detention. The CARA Project also provided a fact sheet on the Flores litigation, covering key points from Judge Gee’s ruling, and discussing what is likely to happen next in the case.

ICE Still detaining people without crimes – against what they stated earlier

A Transactional Records Access Clearing House (TRAC) report finds that detainer use by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has declined, with the latest data showing that ICE issued 7,993 detainers in April 2015—30% fewer than in October 2014. However, according to the data, only 32% of individuals on whom detainers were placed during April 2015 had been convicted of a crime, and only 19% had a felony conviction. Fully two-thirds had no criminal conviction of any type, in sharp contrast to ICE’s announced plan to detain only individuals who have been “convicted of specifically enumerated [serious] crimes.

Good ruling for kids in detention facilities

On Friday, August 21, 2015, U.S. District Judge Dolly Gee issued an order in Flores v. Johnson, ruling that children should generally be released from family detention within five days—preferably to a parent, including a parent with whom they were apprehended. The government must implement the court’s ruling by October 23, 2015.

Family detention

Detention

Child detention

Detention in deportation proceedings

Judge stands up to Immigrations treatment of mothers and children

U.S. District Judge Dolly Gee in Flores v. Johnson that should signal the end of the mass incarceration of children and mothers seeking asylum in the United States. Judge Gee found that the government materially breached the Flores settlement agreement, which requires that children in temporary custody be housed in safe, sanitary, non-secure, and licensed facilities. She granted the plaintiffs’ motion to enforce the agreement, and ordered the government to show cause why children and their accompanying parents should not be released.

This International Business Times article discusses a report released last week by Grassroots Leadership, a Texas nonprofit, which reveals how private prison companies have spent five years lobbying the government to enact conservative immigration reform both to maintain ICE’s bed quota and to ensure a steady flow of inmates into its detention centers. The report says that 62% of all ICE detention beds are now operated by for-profit prison companies.

This International Business Times article discusses a report released last week by Grassroots Leadership, a Texas nonprofit, which reveals how private prison companies have spent five years lobbying the government to enact conservative immigration reform both to maintain ICE’s bed quota and to ensure a steady flow of inmates into its detention centers. The report says that 62% of all ICE detention beds are now operated by for-profit prison companies.

Immigration Reform: How to get prosecutorial discretion from the different Priorities

Immigration Reform: New Detention Policies

Engaged & Soon to get married in Florence Immigration Detention Center

Engaged & Soon to get married in Florence Immigration Detention Center

Got detained?

Immigration detention

Hearings for detained people

Detention in deportation proceedings

Will my attorney tell INS about me?

Question: I have been in the United States for many years. I think there were several things I could have done in the past to help my situation, but did not know exactly what to do. Unfortunately, I let the opportunities pass because I was afraid to see a lawyer. To be honest, I was afraid they would turn me in to INS. Can you tell me what I can do?

Answer: First, you should not be afraid to see a lawyer. Lawyer’s have what is known as the Attorney-Client Privilege. This means that whatever you say to a lawyer cannot be discussed with anyone. If it is, then there is a very serious violation of the Professional Ethics of Responsibility.

Question: What is the reason for the Attorney-Client Privilege?

Answer: Actually, it is meant to protect people in your exact situation. People must not be afraid to see a lawyer to help them. If they thought that the lawyer would either tell someone, or turn them into INS, people would either not come for help, or would not tell the whole story. Naturally, if they did not tell the whole story, the lawyer could not fully represent them.

I have had clients in the past who did not tell me they had prior deportation orders. When the time came to submit everything, these people could have easily been detained and deported. Luckily, I found out the truth. However, had I not found out the truth, there cases would have been severely compromised.

Question: What happens if I get laid off or have a disagreement with my attorney? Can he or she then turn me in to INS?

Answer: No, the attorney-client privilege stays in tact forever. This means that years after the case is over, the attorney can still not disclose the facts of the case. Immigration is a very unique area of law. This is because many times people are afraid of being deported and assume that an attorney is an American who would either be working on behalf of the government or under an obligation to inform the government. While in some countries that may be true, it is not true in the U.S. An attorney is a person who wants to represent you to help you with your immigration problem. You need not be afraid to go into the office of an attorney. There are many constraints on what an attorney can and cannot do. All of these restraints are made to protect the public. Many times you are afraid and alone. Do not let another opportunity pass to obtain legal status because you think the attorney will call INS. You will only be hurting yourself in the future. In most cases, by helping yourself, you will also help your family. If you want to make absolutely certain that it will not be disclosed, make certain the attorney you are seeing is a licensed attorney. Only after you see an attorney and fully discuss every detail of your case can you get full and complete representation.

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/ins/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/ins-deportation-2/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/ins-attorney/

https://californiaimmigration.us/our-immigration-law-firm/