Posted on December 19, 2011 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney
Posted on December 19, 2011 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney
Posted on December 19, 2011 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney
Posted on December 19, 2011 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney
Posted on December 17, 2011 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney
Posted on December 17, 2011 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney
Posted on December 13, 2011 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney
The court held that the BIA reasonably interpreted its own regulations in Matter of S-M-J- when ruling asylum applicants can be required to provide reasonably obtainable corroborating evidence even when their testimony is credible.
Filed under: Immigration Attorney | Tagged: Asylum Applicants, Atty.Brian D. Lerner, BIA, CA5, Corroborating Evidence, Immigration Lawyer | Leave a comment »
Posted on December 13, 2011 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney
In a unanimous opinion, the Court held that the BIA’s comparable grounds rule, as applied to applications for §212(c) relief in deportation proceedings, is arbitrary and capricious under the Administrative Procedure Act.
Filed under: Immigration Attorney | Tagged: Administrative Procedure Act, Atty.Brian D. Lerner, §212(c), BIA, Immigration Lawyer, SC | Leave a comment »
Posted on December 8, 2011 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney
The BIA held that the continuous residence/presence of an alien applying for cancellation ends under the stop-time rule upon service of an NTA, even if the NTA does not include the date and time of the initial hearing.
Filed under: Immigration Attorney | Tagged: Atty.Brian D. Lerner, BIA, Immigration Lawyer, NTA, Stop-Time Rule | Leave a comment »
Posted on December 8, 2011 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney
The BIA held that to establish that a returning LPR is to be treated as an applicant for admission, the government has the burden of proving by clear and convincing evidence that a §101(a)(13)(C) exceptions applies.
Filed under: Immigration Attorney | Tagged: Atty.Brian D. Lerner, §101(a)(13)(C), BIA, Burden of Proof, Immigration Lawyer, LPR | Leave a comment »