• Hours & Info

    (562) 495-0554
    M-F: 8:00am - 6:00 p.m.
    Sat: 9:00 a.m. - 12:00 p.m.
  • Past Blog Posts

  • https://api.whatsapp.com/send?phone=13104885414

CA3 Rejects “Social Visibility” and “Particularity” Concepts in Asylum

The court found that the addition of social visibility and particularity to the BIA’s social group definition is inconsistent with prior decisions and rejected it without a reason for adopting the requirements.

CA7 Rejects Asylum Claim Based on Fear of Retribution from Co-Defendants

The court rejected Petitioners’ claim that the U.S. must grant them asylum because it placed them in danger by inducing their cooperation in a criminal visa fraud case, noting that the S visa might be more appropriate.

https://atomic-temporary-10880024.wpcomstaging.com/tag/asylum-2/

https://atomic-temporary-10880024.wpcomstaging.com/tag/adjudication-of-asylum/

https://atomic-temporary-10880024.wpcomstaging.com/tag/asylum/

https://californiaimmigration.us/asylum/

Getting Asylum

Getting Asylum from the Philippines

Asylum

Adjudication of asylum

Appeal asylum

Apply for asylum

Entering illegally and applying for Asylum

Asylum attorney

Appeal asylum

Asylum seekers

Refugees and asylum

Petitioners’ Motion to Remand denied

The court denied Petitioners’ motion to remand, rejecting their attempt to base a claim for asylum on the fear that their recently born U.S. citizen daughter would be subjected to FGM upon the family’s removal to Guinea. (Mariko v. Holder, 1/24/11)

Petitioners’ Motion to Remand denied

The court denied Petitioners’ motion to remand, rejecting their attempt to base a claim for asylum on the fear that their recently born U.S. citizen daughter would be subjected to FGM upon the family’s removal to Guinea. (Mariko v. Holder, 1/24/11)

Lawyers have a Duty to Investigate all Grounds for Asylum

The court denied rehearing and rehearing en banc where the attorneys failed to inquire into and raise FGM as a basis for asylum from Eritrea. Judge Pregerson dissented, citing the adverse effect the decision will have on asylum seekers.

Petitioner mental anguish and physical paralysis, constituted past persecution

Over dissent, the court found that the cumulative effect of multiple confrontations and threats by the Communist Secret Police in Mongolia, which caused Petitioner mental anguish and physical paralysis, constituted past persecution. (Javhlan v. Holder, 12/3/10

Past Persecution

Rebut Past Persecution

asylum

Past Persecution: You can still get asylum

Court remanded the Asylum case of a Falun Gong Practitioner

The court remanded the asylum case of a Falun Gong practitioner, finding that the evidence established that the petitioner was subject to a well-founded fear of persecution on return to China. (Qiu v. Holder, 7/12/10)

Concern on Counsel’s part to meet multiple court deadlines

The court denied petition for review in asylum case and directed a copy of the opinion to the Wisconsin Office of Lawyer Regulation, finding a lack of evidence of diligent efforts on counsel’s part to meet multiple court deadlines. (Umezurike v. Holder, 7/9/10)