• Hours & Info

    (562) 495-0554
    M-F: 8:00am - 6:00 p.m.
    Sat: 9:00 a.m. - 12:00 p.m.
  • Past Blog Posts

  • https://api.whatsapp.com/send?phone=13104885414

Another win for the Law Offices of Brian D. Lerner

Lawful Permanent Resident granted stand-alone 212(h) waiver after 10 years in Immigration Court.  Client was placed in removal proceedings after returning to the U.S. from a trip abroad because of several California theft convictions.  Client also had previous theft/fraud convictions and an order of deportation.

3rd Circuit makes it harder to get around aggravated felony bar

The Third Circuit upheld the BIA’s decision and denied the petition for review, finding that an immigrant who is admitted as a lawful permanent resident on a conditional basis (“conditional LPR”) qualifies as “an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence” for purposes of the aggravated felony bar under INA §212(h).

In a precedent decision issued today, the BIA held that a respondent who adjusted status inside the U.S., and who did not enter as an LPR, is not barred from establishing eligibility for a waiver of inadmissibility under INA §212(h). In so doing, the BIA withdrew from its previous decisions on the topic, aligning its holding with that of nine circuit courts who have held that the plain language of §212(h) precludes immigrants from establishing eligibility for relief only if they lawfully entered the U.S. as permanent residents and thereafter committed a removable offense for which a waiver is required.

Appeal to BIA

BIA

Board of immigration appeals

Bia deference given to particulary serious crime

BIA Finds LPR Who Adjusts Status in U.S. Is Not Barred from §212(h) Waiver

In a precedent decision issued today, the BIA held that a respondent who adjusted status inside the U.S., and who did not enter as an LPR, is not barred from establishing eligibility for a waiver of inadmissibility under INA §212(h). In so doing, the BIA withdrew from its previous decisions on the topic, aligning its holding with that of nine circuit courts who have held that the plain language of §212(h) precludes immigrants from establishing eligibility for relief only if they lawfully entered the U.S. as permanent residents and thereafter committed a removable offense for which a waiver is required.

All but two federal circuit courts have rejected Matter of Koljenovic: The 8th Circuit upheld the BIA, and the 1st Circuit has not ruled.

Aggravated felonies

What is an aggravated felony?

Aggravated felony bar

Felony immigration violations

§212(h) Aggravated Felony Bar Cases in 1st or 8th Circuits

All but two federal circuit courts have rejected Matter of Koljenovic: The 8th Circuit upheld the BIA, and the 1st Circuit has not ruled.

Another recent immigration win. AOS and 212 (h)

Another recent immigration win. AOS and 212(h) case granted by IJ Tabaddor. DHS waived appeal. Represented client throughout removal process; from when she was detained by ICE and placed in proceedings until she was granted permanent residency. Client was initially charged with inadmissibilty but later with removability once we submitted proof of her lawful entry. Client married her USC husband while in proceedings and we prepared and filed the I-130 which was approved after an RFE. She had several theft convictions, the most recent in 2009 with a 16 month sentence. Client and her co-sponsor testified in support of her applications. Court determined that testimony of husband and children and other witness was not necessary. http://ow.ly/sEOaU

AOS meaning

Petitioner ineligible for AOS

USCIS inventory of employment based for presenting US birth certificare and continuos physical presence

Adjustment granted in court

 

 

 

 

Alien who procured his admission for permanent residence by fraud or misrepresentation could not obtain a waiver of inadmissibility under Sec. 212(h)

Alien who procured his admission for permanent residence by fraud or misrepresentation could not obtain a waiver of inadmissibility under Sec. 212(h) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, since alien was inspected and authorized to enter the United States before he was convicted of an aggravated felony. Term “previously been admitted” in Sec. 212(h) refers to a procedurally regular admission and not a substantively lawful admission.
Sum v. Holder – filed April 23, 2010

212 H-2

212 application

212h process

Law Offices of Brian D. Lerner, APC