• Hours & Info

    (562) 495-0554
    M-F: 8:00am - 6:00 p.m.
    Sat: 9:00 a.m. - 12:00 p.m.
  • Past Blog Posts

  • https://api.whatsapp.com/send?phone=13104885414

Mexico is concerned that a recent Supreme Court ruling on cross-border shootings will set a precedent.

On Tuesday, the Supreme Court barred a lawsuit by the family of a Mexican teenager shot on the Mexican side of the border against a Border Patrol agent who was on the U.S. side. In response, the Mexican government had “deep concerns about the effects that this decision will have on other similar cases, in which Mexican citizens have died from gunshots fired by U.S. agents towards the Mexican side.”

The Supreme Court is weighing the issue of criminalization of advocacy for undocumented immigrants.

The Supreme Court heard oral argument on whether a law that makes it a crime to encourage someone to come to or reside in the U.S. illegally is unconstitutional. The government appealed from a 9th Circuit decision which struck down the law, saying it was too broad and would chill free speech in violation of the First Amendment.

Greyhound will stop allowing immigration checks on buses.

On February 21, Greyhound announced that the company will no longer allow Border Patrol to conduct immigration checks on buses. To facilitate this, Greyhound said it would notify CBP and DHS that it does not consent to searches and train employees on the updated policy. Border Patrol agents who do not have a warrant cannot board the buses without the consent of the company.

The new public charge rule has been implemented.

On February 24, USCIS implemented the Trump administration’s updated public charge rule. The rule broadens the type of public benefits that are considered for inadmissibility determinations, including Temporary Assistance to Needy Families, Medicaid, and food stamps. Already considered were cash assistance programs. The rule applies to those seeking permanent residency, including change of status, as well as those seeking to extend their nonimmigrant status.

A USCIS policy manual update has clarified the effect of long absences from the U.S. on continuous residency.

On February 26, USCIS published an update to the policy manual. The update clarified that applicants absent from the U.S. for more than 6 months but less than a year must overcome the presumption that they have broken the continuity of residence in the U.S. It also clarifies that if continuity of residence is broken, the applicant must establish a new period of residency before applying for citizenship. These requirements already existed but have now been clarified in the policy manual.

The H-2B cap has been reached for the second half of the fiscal year

On February 26, USCIS published an announcement that the cap on H-2B petitions for the second half of fiscal year 2020 has been met. Any petitions filed after February 18 with requested employment start dates before October 1, 2020 will be rejected.

USCIS updated several immigration forms

 On February 24, USCIS published updated versions of several forms. For many of the forms, starting February 24 only the new edition will be accepted.

Another win for our Law Office

After nearly 3 years, and despite various possible grounds of inadmissibility, Client’s application for adjustment of status was granted based on her approved I-360 under the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA).  Client can now remain in the United States legally and apply for naturalization in 3 years.

I-360 form

I-360 petition

Religious worker I-360

Law Offices of Brian D. Lerner

Another Win for Our Law Office

After nearly 3 years, and despite various possible grounds of inadmissibility, Client’s application for adjustment of status was granted based on her approved I-360 under the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA).  Client can now remain in the United States legally and apply for naturalization in 3 years.

Another win for the Law Offices of Brian D. Lerner

Sua sponte motion to reopen 22-year-old removal order granted by the Immigration Court in Phoenix, Arizona for Mexican citizen with a federal conviction for distribution of a controlled substance.  Client can now return to the United States to apply for 212(c) relief and fight his deportation.

212 (c) meaning

Apply for 212 (c)

212(c) requirements

212(c) eligibility