• Hours & Info

    (562) 495-0554
    M-F: 8:00am - 6:00 p.m.
    Sat: 9:00 a.m. - 12:00 p.m.
  • Past Blog Posts

  • https://api.whatsapp.com/send?phone=13104885414

Dashboard ‹ Immigration Attorney Blog — WordPress http://ping.fm/Bz3GS

Waiting for years outside the U.S. Is not necessary

Do I have to wait for years to come to the U.S.?

Question: I have been waiting for many years to come to the United States from a petition from my sister. It has been 14 years. Must I still wait?

Answer: Actually, it takes even more years to do this. The visa number must be current and there is no way to speed this process up. However, there are different petitions where they do not have to wait for the visa number as they are not required to be on the visa waiting list to be able to come into the United States.

Question: What types of petitions are these?

Answer: Battered spouses/children; Returning resident aliens; Certain former U.S. Citizens; Qualifying ministers of religion and religious workers; and Certain widows and widowers of U.S. citizens.

Question: Can I have more than 1 petition go through at a time, or must I wait for my petition from my sister to become current.

Answer: You can have as many petitions as you like. It is like two horses going around the track. The first one to the finish line wins. Thus, for example, if you have a church that will petition you for the special immigrant religious petition, by all means try to get it.

Question: So which petition are on the visa waiting chart?

Answer: The basic category includes Family-based preference immigrants; Employment-based preference immigrants; Diversity immigrants; and Family unity immigrants.

Question: What about temporary visas? Can I come in temporarily while waiting?

Answer: Most of the time, the answer would be no. However, there is what is known as the H-1B work visa which allows both immigrant processing and the H-1B to go forward at exactly the same time. You will need to have an employer agree to sponsor you for a job. It does not need to be a full-time position, but it should be related to your degree. Once filed, this petition only takes about 6 months to process.

Another type of petition for a non-immigrant visa would be the L-1. An L-1 Visa is one of the nicest working visas as it allows you to run your own business or a business owned by the foreign company. If you have your own business outside the U.S. and have been working there for at least one year, you can come to the U.S. on the L-1 Visa.

Additionally, your spouse and unmarried children under 21 years old can come as beneficiaries to your approved L-2. Your children will be able to go to school in the U.S. without having to get a separate student visa (as long as they are not in college.). A great deal of the success of the L-1 Petition is how it is prepared. Unlike other investment related visas, the investment in the U.S. business could be as low as $10,000U.S.  

Thus, there are several ways to avoid the multiple years of waiting outside the U.S.

Video: Must I wait years more to process through the U.S. Consulate? – Avvo.com http://ping.fm/xzEr1

Video: Consulate Processing and an introduction to Web Sites to help you. – Avvo.com http://ping.fm/5lbIi

USCIS Update on Processing Changes for Naturalization and Citizenship Forms

USCIS update on the centralization of receipting for various N-Forms at the Dallas and Phoenix Lockbox facilities beginning on 10/30/11. As of 12/5/11, local offices will no longer forward these forms and applicants will be instructed to re-submit to the appropriate Lockbox.

USCIS Announces Restoration of I-797 Mailing Procedures and Other Updates

USCIS announcement on 10/20/11 that I-797 mailing procedures will be restored in approximately six weeks to have original notices going to G-28 attorneys, with copies going to applicant or petitioner. The announcement includes additional updates as well.

CA10 on “Illegal Reentry” for Purposes of Reinstatement of Removal

The court held that where Petitioner was waived through at the border one month after her removal from the U.S., she “reenter[ed] the United States illegally” for purposes of reinstatement of removal under INA §241(a)(5).

My FOIA took YEARS, not only 20 days! « Immigration Attorney Blog http://ping.fm/x2wAS

Immigration Attorney Blog http://ping.fm/9AXoz

My FOIA took YEARS, not only 20 days!

I have to wait years for a FOIA?

Question: I filed for a FOIA years ago and still do not have a response. Is there anything I can do?

Answer: It has taken longer and longer. The Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) does allow you to get a copy of of your file from Immigration to basically see what information they have on you. There was actually a case in U.S. District Court which had this same issue. In that case, Mirsad Hajro is a lawful permanent resident of the United States who applied for naturalization in 2003. In October 2007, Hajro received notice that his application had been denied based on evidence in his alien registration file that allegedly revealed false testimony regarding his foreign military service. On or about November 9, 2007, Hajro filed an appeal pursuant to 8 U.S.C. 1447(a) and requested a review hearing before an immigration officer. Hajro also filed a request under FOIA with the Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”), USCIS, National Records Center, seeking a copy of his alien registration file. Hajro has since applied for and been denied naturalization a second time on the same grounds.

Hajro requested expedited processing of his FOIA request under the terms of a 1992 national settlement agreement (“Settlement Agreement”). The Settlement Agreement provides for the establishment of a national policy on priority for processing FOIA / Privacy Act requests to be used by Immigration and Naturalization Service (“INS”) officers. The policy requires immediate processing of an expedited request, where the failure to process a request immediately would either: (a) jeopardize life or personal safety; or (b) impair “substantial due process rights of the requester” and the information sought is not otherwise available. Hajro’s request noted that he needed the copy of his alien registration file in order to see the alleged evidence upon which the denial was based in time to prepare his appeal.
Basically, Hajro needed to get a FOIA to see what evidence was in the file against him to claim that he has committed fraud. It certainly was impairing his due process rights by not having it. Likewise, most people who file FOIA’s are not just filing them because they want an extra copy of their file. They are filing it because they are being denied some benefit from Immigration or not able to move forward with some immigration process.
Question: Well, I’m assuming he did not get his FOIA which was the basis for the suit. Why not?
Answer: On November 19, 2007, Cejka, the Director of the San Francisco Office of USCIS, sent a letter acknowledging receipt of Hajro’s FOIA request and informing him that it did not qualify for expedited processing and would be processed on the Track 2 “complex track.” The Settlement Agreement notwithstanding, since 2007, USCIS has used a three-track system for processing FOIA requests: “Track 1” for simple requests, “Track 2” for complex inquiries that require additional time, and “Track 3” for expedited processing for individuals subject to removal proceedings and scheduled for a hearing before an immigration judge.
Question: So what was the ultimate ruling in the case?
Answer: Plaintiffs argue that the unlawful withholding of information underlying USCIS’s denial of Hajro’s naturalization application violated his fundamental due process rights to a fair hearing. Specifically, Plaintiffs contend that Hajro has a constitutional right to see the evidence relied upon by Defendants in their decision to deny citizenship, and that denial of citizenship should not be based on “secret evidence” unless national security is involved. Plaintiffs also point out that Hajro’s counsel needed to see the evidence in order to prepare his client’s appeal, such that these circumstances, like those discussed in other attorney declarations submitted by Plaintiffs, constituted a situation where expedited processing of the FOIA request would have been warranted under the due process protections of the Settlement Agreement.
Therefore, the Judge ruled that Hajro should have received the FOIA within 20 days of requesting it. Likewise, if you have such a case, especially where allegations are being alle`ged against you, make sure you get a FOIA and if there is a delay, you can sue them in Federal Court.