• Hours & Info

    (562) 495-0554
    M-F: 8:00am - 6:00 p.m.
    Sat: 9:00 a.m. - 12:00 p.m.
  • Past Blog Posts

  • https://api.whatsapp.com/send?phone=13104885414

Petitioner ineligible for AOS for presenting US Birth Certificate and continuous Physical Presence in a U.S. birth certificate

The court found Petitioner ineligible for AOS for presenting a U.S. birth certificate in attempting to enter, and ineligible for cancellation because physical presence was interrupted when he withdrew his application for admission. (Valadez-Munoz v. Holder, 10/28/10)

H-2A Petitioners on prohibited fees

Petitioner to pursue an argument never presented to the BIA

Petitioner

Sibling Petition Summary

Robbery under CA Penal Code §211 is a crime involving moral turpitude

The court found reasonable the BIA’s determination that robbery under Cal. Penal Code §211 is a crime involving moral turpitude for purposes of INA §212(a)(2)(A)(i)(I). (Mendoza v. Holder, 10/27/10)

crime involving moral turpitude

crime of moral turpitude

Crimes of Moral Turpitude

Multiple Laws Exist to Make You Removable

 

Conditional parolee not eligible for adjustment of status

The court held that an alien released on conditional parole under INA §236 is not “paroled into the United States” for purposes of eligibility for adjustment of status under INA §245. (Delgado-Sobalvarro v. Att’y Gen. of the U.S., 11/2/10)

Adjustment of Status

Conditional parolee not eligible for adjustment of status

AOS

Misdemeanor false imprisonment in violation of CA Penal Code §236

The court held that misdemeanor false imprisonment in violation of Cal. Penal Code §236 is not categorically a crime involving moral turpitude. (Saavedra-Figueroa v. Holder, 11/5/10)

Misdemeanor false imprisonment in violation of CA Penal Code §236

crime involving moral turpitude

crime of moral turpitude

Wins

Decision to deny administrative closure

The court held that the decision to deny administrative closure is a procedural ruling which the court may review under an abuse of discretion standard to determine whether Petitioner has received a full and fair hearing. (Vahora v. Holder, 11/15/10)

administrative closure

Motion for Administrative Closure

Decision to deny administrative closure

deportation-attorney helps clients in U.S.

Petitioner mental anguish and physical paralysis, constituted past persecution

Over dissent, the court found that the cumulative effect of multiple confrontations and threats by the Communist Secret Police in Mongolia, which caused Petitioner mental anguish and physical paralysis, constituted past persecution. (Javhlan v. Holder, 12/3/10

Past Persecution

Rebut Past Persecution

asylum

Past Persecution: You can still get asylum

Visa retrogression for various immigrant visa categories

The DOS Liaison Committee reminds members that despite visa retrogression for various immigrant visa categories, posts should issue immigrant visas with a full six-month validity, even if the applicant’s immigrant visa category will retrogress.

Immigrant Visa Retrogression

Visa retrogression for various immigrant visa categories

DOS

Retrogression is always a possibility when awaiting a Visa

Finding No Egregious 4th Amendment Violation

The court refused to suppress evidence of Petitioner’s alienage, finding no egregious 4th Amendment violation where no allegations of misconduct were asserted beyond a claim of a lack of probable cause at the time of his arrest. (Puc-Ruiz v. Holder, 12/23/10)

Finding no egregious 4th Amendment violation

4th amendment

Amendment Violation

4th amendment violation

VSC on securing a three-year H-1B extension for petitions

The Vermont Service Center (VSC) Liaison committee offers practitioners pointers in order to maximize the likelihood of securing a three-year H-1B extension for petitions involving placement at third-party worksites.

three-year H-1B extension for petitions

h-1b immigration attorney

H-1B

H-1B extension

USCIS has discretion to adjust the status of immediate relative

The Solicitor General’s Brief in Opposition to Certiorari in Bradley v. Holder confirms that notwithstanding Bradley and similar cases, USCIS has discretion to adjust the status of immediate relative VWP overstays no matter when the I-485 is filed.

Immediate Relatives

USCIS has discretion to adjust the status of immediate relative

adjust status

immediate relative