• Hours & Info

    (562) 495-0554
    M-F: 8:00am - 6:00 p.m.
    Sat: 9:00 a.m. - 12:00 p.m.
  • Past Blog Posts

  • https://api.whatsapp.com/send?phone=13104885414

Are H-1B’s and H-2B’s used up yet?

 Question: I have heard that H-1B’s and H-2B’s are going quickly. Are they used up yet?

Answer: The DHS recently published numbers of H-1B’s and H-2B’s currently used. The H-1B nonimmigrant visa category allows U.S. employers to augment the existing labor force with highly skilled temporary workers. H-1B workers are admitted to the United States for an initial period of three years, which may be extended for an additional three years. The H-1B visa program is utilized by some U.S. businesses and other organizations to employ foreign workers in specialty occupations that require theoretical or technical expertise in a specialized field. Typical H-1B occupations include architects, engineers, computer programmers, accountants, doctors and college professors. The current annual cap on the H-1B category is 65,000. It appears that for non advanced degree holders, the cap of about 58,000 has approved over 22,000 and has about 30,000 pending. This means there are only about 5,000 left. You should get your H-1B in right away.

However, if you have an advanced degree, there was an extra 20,000 H-1B’s allocated. For the rest of the 2005 fiscal year, there have been about 10,300 that have been approved. Thus, there is still a reasonable amount left. For the fiscal year of 2006, there have already been about 8,000 used up.

The H-2B visa category allows U.S. employers in industries with peak load, seasonal or intermittent needs to augment their existing labor force with temporary workers. The H-2B visa category also allows U.S. employers to augment their existing labor force when necessary due to a one-time occurrence which necessitates a temporary increase in workers. Typically, H-2B workers fill labor needs in occupational areas such as construction, health care, landscaping, lumber, manufacturing, food service/processing, and resort/hospitality services.

Of the 35,000 left until October 1, 2005, about 16,000 have been used. There have only been about 300 used up for the first half of 2006. Therefore, there seems to be quite of bit of H-2B’s left.

Question: Do you think there is any problem with filing an H-1B or an H-2B at this time?

Answer: You never know how soon all of the visas will be used up. There are people across the U.S. who are aware that there is a limit on these visas and are trying to get their visas in right away. Therefore, you should have your visa petition prepared right away to ensure you get in this years allotment. All kinds of status problems could occur if the allotment is used up and your stay in the U.S. expires afterwards.

Question: Should we file the H-1B and/or H-2B with premium processing?

Answer: Definitely. You never know if your application will be filed one after the last one. Therefore, to ensure your chances, pay the $1,000 premium processing fee and have peace of mind.

PERM: LULAC and CSS are still not over

 Question: I think I’m under LULAC, but never knew I could file again. I believed I missed the deadline. Is there anything I could do?

Answer: Yes. U.S Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) announced today that the filing deadline for applications for legalization under the terms of the CSS and LULAC (Newman) settlement agreements is extended from May 23, 2005 until December 31, 2005.

This is not a new amnesty program. The CSS and LULAC (Newman) settlement agreements allow for those who meet certain requirements to apply or reapply for Temporary Resident status under the 1986 amnesty program of Section 245A of Immigration and Nationality Act.

Eligible individuals may apply by submitting a Form I-687, Application for Status as a Temporary Resident under Section 245A of the Immigration and Nationality Act, and a CSS/ LULAC (Newman) Class Membership Worksheet.

Question: What are the basic requirements to be eligible?

Answer: 1) You had to live in the United States unlawfully from before January 1, 1982, to a date between May 5, 1987, and May 4, 1988, when you went to an office of the Immigration Service or a Qualified Designated entity to apply for legalization.

2) You, your parent or your spouse visited an INS office or Qualified Designated Entity between May 5, 1987, and May 4, 1988, to apply for legalization.

3) The INS or QDE told you that you were ineligible for legalization because you had traveled outside the United States without INS permission. You, your spouse or your parent returned to the United States with an immigration issued document such as a Student Visa, Visitor Visa or some other Immigration issued document.

4) You do NOT need to have previously “registered” as a LULAC class member or even had a completed application. However, you did need to go the QDE in the specified time period.

Question: What type of evidence do I need to present to win under this LULAC Settlement agreement?

Answer: Clearly, many people do not have the original documents, or even any stamped documents from Immigration. Usually, if the former INS had rejected the application because of what is known as ‘front-desking’, the person was just turned away. Thus, it is not possible in many instances for an applicant to prove that they were rejected. However, the LULAC settlement specifically states that persons who fall under this settlement may establish eligibility for legalization by way of declarations, and not only by original documents. The settlement also provides class members the right to appeal to a “special master,” a judicial officer with the authority to correct the CIS’s errors in the event the agency does not decide a class member’s legalization application promptly, fairly, and in accordance with the settlement’s guidelines.

Question: When can I apply for this?

Answer: The settlement provides that CIS must begin accepting legalization applications no later than May 24, 2004, but the government might decide to begin the one-year application somewhat earlier. This means that individuals will now have until December 2005, to apply for legalization under the settlement.

Question: Is there any other previous amnesty related provisions that this settlement agreement is applicable toward?

Answer: Actually there are others. Catholic Social Services is another program that is applicable to this settlement agreement. There are a couple of differences. First, you would have had to travel outside the U.S. without authorization after November 6, 1986. Second, you returned to the U.S. without permission.

Therefore, since it has been extended, do not let the deadline pass again if you qualify.

PERM: The Online Perm System

 Question: I understand that the new PERM applications can be submitted online. However, where the employer has established a sub-account for an attorney or agent is the attorney or agent permitted to submit applications on-line?

Answer: Yes, attorney or agent may submit applications under the following circumstances. An employer must complete the registration process as explained at http://www.plc.doleta.gov, including the initial log-in. During the initial log-in, the employer will change the employer’s temporary password (as assigned by the system during registration) and once logged-in, the employer can establish a sub-account for an attorney or agent. The employer will select a username for the attorney or agent, and the system will assign a temporary password. The attorney or agent will receive an e-mail with the username, temporary password, and the employer’s PIN. When the attorney or agent logs in and changes the attorney’s or agent’s password, the attorney or agent is then permitted to complete and submit applications on-line on behalf of the employer using the PIN of the employer in whose name the application is being filed.

Question: Are there any circumstances under which mailing in a labor certification application would prove more successful than electronically submitting an application on-line?

Answer: No, mailing-in an application will not prove more successful, as the mailed-in application, upon receipt at the National Processing Center, is date stamped. Until the application is data entered into the system by a data entry person (using the exact information shown on the form 9089), processing will not begin on the application. Once entered in the system, the mailed-in application receives the exact same automated analysis and manual scrutiny as an application submitted electronically. If there are two identical applications, one submitted electronically and one mailed-in, there will be no difference in how they are processed. The only difference will be in processing time; a mailed-in application will take longer, as not only mailing but also the data entry time will be involved. Remember: the on-line system will identify mistakes (e.g. entering four digits for a zip code instead of five digits) before allowing the application to be submitted, but the data entry person must enter the information exactly as shown on the application; a mistake on the form may trigger an audit or denial.

Question: Are there some tips you might have to get the process done quicker?

Answer: DOL verifies the existence of each employer that attempts to register. At first, this process went very quickly and employers received their PIN numbers and passwords sometimes within hours. Now that more employers are registering, it is taking an average of two weeks to get feedback on a registration. Because of the length of time it’s taking to register an employer, some are attempting to register multiple times, thus exacerbating the problem.

In many cases, DOL is sending back emails indicating that it cannot verify the employer’s existence and/or asking for documentation to verify that existence. DOL provided some pointers to avoid these requests or, if received, to respond to them:

On the form, please make sure that the company’s Headquarters address is included as the company address. You can put the address of the office where the beneficiary will work in the appropriate box, but it’s the overall corporate address that is pivotal on the “existence check”.

Avoid “doing business as (dba)” names wherever possible, and instead use the company’s legal name. The dba may complicate an existence check.

For companies that have several EINs, please use the EIN that the company had when it filed its articles of incorporation. If a separately incorporated subsidiary is registering, do use that subsidiary’s EIN, but don’t use a different EIN if the employer is just a division, or otherwise is not a legally separate entity.

The DOL recognizes that the Form SS-4 may not be readily available to some employers. If you’ve received a request for documentation to verify the employer’s existence that requests a Form SS-4, the DOL indicates that it will accept the employer’s most recent quarterly tax return instead. It has recently changed its requests to include that option, but if you received one of the old requests that give no alternative to the Form SS-4, please be advised that the quarterly tax return is nonetheless an option.

To create a sub-account for an attorney, the employer must log on using the designated PIN and password and create the account.

The employer can view all filings prepared by attorneys for which it has set up sub-accounts, but an attorney can view only the applications he or she has done, and cannot view any filings done by the employer or its other attorneys.

Because DOL wants the employer to be answerable for the process, an attorney will need to have a separate user account and password for each of its client companies. DOL realizes the difficulties this presents in managing multiple passwords, but is insistent on this system.

When an employer registers, it gets two emails, one providing the PIN and one providing a password. The employer is then supposed to log on and change the password to one of its own choosing. DOL notes that some employers have been simply forwarding the PIN and password to the attorney, and then the attorney logs in and changes the password. The employer then loses control of the account, as it no longer has control of the password. DOL asks that employers make the password change themselves, as DOL want the employer to maintain control of the master account.

Some employers have been having trouble receiving the emails with the PINs and passwords because of their spam filters. Because they come in two consecutive emails from the same sender—Dept. of Labor—some spam filters clear the emails out into the spam box. This, apparently, is a particular problem with those who use AOL as their ISP. One solution DOL suggests (apart from checking your spam box) is to create a free email account on Yahoo or hotmail for this purpose and thereby bypass the AOL filters. You might also be able to turn off some of AOL’s spam blocking.

Therefore, it seems as though it might take some time to get used to, but once familiar, it should go faster.

Removal Proceedings – What is it?

 Question: I am now in removal proceedings. I also have many friends who are in the same type of removal proceedings. However, all of us have different situations. Under what basis can we be put into removal proceedings?

Answer: The Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR), an agency of the Department of Justice, oversees three components which adjudicate matters involving immigration law matters at both the trial and appellate level. Under the Office of the Chief Immigration Judge, more than 200 Immigration Judges located in 53 Immigration Courts nationwide conduct proceedings and decide individual cases. The agency includes the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA), which hears appeals of Immigration Judge decisions, and the Office of the Chief Administrative Hearing Officer, which handles employment-related immigration matters.

Immigration Judges conduct removal proceedings, which account for approximately 80 percent of their caseload. Removal hearings are conducted to determine whether certain aliens are subject to removal from the country. Beginning April 1, 1997, the distinction between exclusion and deportation proceedings was eliminated, and aliens subject to removal from the United States were all placed in removal proceedings. Thus, the removal proceeding is now generally the sole procedure for determining whether an alien is inadmissible, deportable, or eligible for relief from removal. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is responsible for commencing a removal proceeding.

Removal proceedings generally require an Immigration Judge to make two findings: (1) a determination of the alien’s removability from the United States, and (2) thereafter deciding whether the alien is eligible for a form of relief from removal.

Usually at the beginning, an Immigration Judge conducts a bond redetermination hearing for aliens who are in DHS detention. The person in proceedings makes a request to the Immigration Judge to lower or eliminate the amount of the bond set by the DHS. These hearings are generally informal and are not a part of the removal proceedings. This decision can be appealed by either the alien or by DHS to the BIA.

Question: One of my friends actually already has their Green Card. Why would he be in removal proceedings?

Answer: An Immigration Judge can conducts a rescission hearing to determine whether a lawful permanent resident (LPR) should have his or her residency status rescinded because he or she was not entitled to it when it was granted. Additionally, it is possible for someone who is an LPR to commit a crime making them ineligible to keep their Green Card.

Question: What about someone who fears going back to their home country?

Answer: An asylum-only hearing will be used to determine whether certain aliens who are not entitled to a removal hearing but claim a well-founded fear of persecution in their home country are eligible for asylum. In normal circumstances, asylum claims are heard by Immigration Judges during the course of a removal hearing.

Thus, there are many different types of hearings that can be conducted. There is many times relief from removal proceedings, so you need to fight hard during the proceedings and do not let anyone walk over your rights.

 

PERM: More on Terrorism.

Question: I have heard a great deal of new regulations and rules regarding anti-terrorism efforts. Have there been any new provisions recently that have been added?

Answer: Yes. If you are in Immigration Court and have submitted several different types of applications, there is a new procedure being implemented which is another layer of security checks.

Question: Which applications are applicable?

Answer: The applications are divided into two areas. First, if you apply for Asylum and Withholding of Removal. Secondly would be if you are applying for Adjustment of Status, Cancellation of Removal for Lawful Permanent Residents, Cancellation of Removal for Non Permanent Residents, Suspension of Deportation or Special NACARA Suspension of Deportation.

Question: If you are applying for the first category of Asylum and Withholding of Removal, what must you now do?

Answer: You must send certain documents now to the USCIS Nebraska Service Center. It should be entitled ‘Defensive Asylum Application with Immigration Court.’ You need to send a clear copy of the first three pages of your completed Form I-589 (Application for Asylum and for Withholding of Removal) that you will be filing or have filed with the Immigration Court, which must include your full name, your current mailing address, and your alien number (A number). Do Not submit any documents other than the first three pages of the completed I-589) and (2) A copy of Form EOIR–28 (Notice of Entry of Appearance as Attorney or Representative before the Immigration Court) if you are represented by an attorney.

Question: What will happen after these documents are sent in?

Answer: A USCIS receipt notice in the mail indicating that USCIS has received your asylum application, and an Application Support Center (ASC) notice for you and each dependent included in your application. Each ASC noticewill indicate the individual’s unique receipt number and will provide instructions for each person to appear for an appointment at a nearby ASC for collection of biometrics (such as your photograph, fingerprints, and signature). You should receive the notice within three weeks after submitting the documents to the USCIS in Nebraska. You (and your dependents) must then attend the biometrics appointment at the ASC, and obtain a biometrics confirmation document before leaving the ASC, and retain your ASC biometrics confirmation as proof that your biometrics were taken, and bring it to your future Immigration Court hearings.

Question: What is the procedure for the other applications you stated will be filed in Immigration Court?

Answer: A clear copy of the entire application form that you will be filing or have filed with the Immigration Court. (Do not submit any documents other than the completed form itself); (2) the appropriate application fee; (3) the $70 USCIS biometrics fee and (4) A copy of Form EOIR–28 (Notice of Entry of Appearance as Attorney or Representative before the Immigration Court) if you are represented. You should send it to the USCIS Texas Service Center.

Question: After you send these documents to Texas, will the same procedure be followed as with the Asylum application.

Answer: Most of it is exactly the same. However, with these applications, after you receive your biometrics appointment and get your fingerprints taken, you must file the following with the Immigration Court within the time period directed by the Immigration Judge: (1) the original application Form, (2) all supporting documentation, and (3) the USCIS notice that instructs you to appear for an appointment at the ASC.

Hopefully, this new procedure will not delay proceedings and will move efficiently through the process.


 

I thought H-1B’s were dead!

Question: I have heard that H-1B’s were all used up for this fiscal year on the very first day. I have my Masters in Business Administration and was hoping to get an H-1B. Is there anything I can do?

Answer: Actually, there have been new H-1B provisions which have been passed by both the House and the Senate. It is simply awaiting signature by the President of the United States to make it law. It was actually passed inside of an Omnibus Budget Bill.

The new H-1B laws are entitled the ‘H-1B Visa Reform Act of 2004’. Now an employer must pay $1,500 to have an H-1B petition filed. If the employer has less than 25 employees, then the employer will only be required to pay $750.00. Additionally, there is a ‘Fraud Fee’ for both H’s and L’s of $500. Apparently, there is a big concern about fraudulently filed H’s and L’s and now everybody who files such applications must pay $500 which will go to a specific unit to investigate such fraud.

Next, the prevailing wage to be paid must be 100% (not 95%) of what is normal for the industry. However, the law now mandates that instead of the currently listed two tier wage for experience, there should be a four tier level of experience to determine the wage.

The Department of Labor will be able to conduct and initiate investigations into what it believes are employers violating the H-1B provisions.

In regards to your situation, now people who earn Master’s or higher degree from a U.S. institution are now exempt from the H-1B cap. There is a limitation of 20,000 per year for this exemption. Thus, assuming this is signed into law, it would help you for the next fiscal year. This is certainly a step in the right direction.

Question: There are certainly a lot of fees that have been added. Where are all of those fees going to go?

Answer: The distribution of money will be as follows: Job training- from 55% to 50%; Scholarship program- from 22% to 30%; National Science Foundation grant program for K-12 Math. Science and Technology education- from 15% to 10%; DHS processing from 4% to 5% and DOL processing maintained at 5%. The scholarships for computer science or other technology or science programs are increased from $3,125 to $10,000.

The most important provisions changing the H-1B program seem to be the exemption of persons with Master’s and higher education in the U.S. This will actually free up 20,000 more H-1B’s per year for everyone else. While this is not nearly enough, it is certainly a good start.

If I stay, I will be killed

Question: I live in a country that is very dangerous. It is not democratic and I decided to protest against the government in order to try to make some democratic changes. I was in a protest rally. Unfortunately, the government sent its soldiers out and killed many people. I escaped. However, the government suspects that I was in the protest rally (as well as distributing e-mails and other pro-democracy pamphlets.) I am now afraid for my life. I went to the United States Consulate in my home country and got a visa to the United States I basically lied and said I just wanted to visit the United States I was desperate to get out of the country. Now I am in the United States Is there anything I can do?

Answer: You can certainly apply for asylum in the United States Asylum provides a haven in the United States for certain persecuted people of the world. The Attorney General may grant asylum to aliens present in the United States who have been the subject of persecution in their home country. Because of the broad rights granted to asylees, and concern that many people who apply for asylum do not actually qualify for it, all asylum applicants must meet stringent substantive and procedural requirements.

Question: How can I qualify for asylum?

Answer: To establish eligibility for asylum, you must show that you are a refugee. The term ‘refugee’ means any person who is outside any country of such person’s nationality or, in the case of a person having no nationality, is outside any country in which such person last habitually resided, and who is unable or unwilling to return to, and is unable or unwilling to avail himself or herself of the protection of that country because of persecution or a well-founded fear of persecution on account of race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group, or political opinion.

Therefore, asylum is not just for those who apply for ‘political’ asylum. The United States opens the doors to persons whom are subjected to religious, nationality and other categories of persecution.

Question: I have not actually been persecuted in the past. I am just deathly afraid to go back because of what will happen to me. Is this a problem?

Answer: No. If you can show that you have a well founded fear of future persecution, then it is not necessary to show past persecution. If on the other hand, you were able to show past persecution, then it is presumed you will suffer future persecution. Thus, you have more of a hurdle to get over, but if you will be persecuted upon your return to your home country, you are certainly eligible to apply for asylum.

Question: If I am granted asylum, can my wife and children come to the United States with me and will I be able to work?

Answer: After an alien is granted asylum, he or she is called an asylee. His or her spouse and children may be granted permission to reside in the United States. An asylee will receive appropriate authorization to enable him or her to work in the United States. Finally, because asylum is a temporary status, the asylee can apply for other, more permanent, types of status in the United States.

Brian D. Lerner is an Immigration Attorney Specialist. This firm does every aspect of immigration law including family and employment based petitions, deportation defense and criminal related immigration issues, asylum, naturalization, appeals, nonimmigrant visas, immigrant visas, and all other areas of immigration law. An appointment can be made by calling (866) 495-0554 or (562) 495-0554. The Firm website is www.californiaimmigration.us.

Door is Closed for Professionals

Question: I came here on a visitor visa 3 months ago and now I would like to apply for the H-1B. What must I do?

Answer: Unfortunately, you are too late for this years allotment. As of October 1, 2004, all H-1B’s have been allotted for the next fiscal year until October 1, 2005. Thus, as unfair as it seems, the day the new year’s allotment was opened, it was shut off and closed.

The H-1B Cap prohibits U.S. Employers from hiring global talent On October 1, 2004. USCIS officials announced that the H-1B cap on visas for highly educated foreign professionals had been reached. Unless Congress takes action before the end of the 108th session, employers will be barred from hiring new H-1B foreign professionals for an entire year. Essential action would include exempting from the H-1B numerical cap graduates from U.S. universities who have earned a Master’s degree or higher. Such a rational solution to this crisis would help ensure a workable H-1B program that would give U.S. employers access to the talent they need and help retain jobs in America. A select number of H-1B professionals are graduates from U.S. top universities’ Master’s and PhD programs. In the graduate-level math and sciences programs, foreign nationals represent roughly half of all graduates. Prohibiting access to these world-class minds raises troubling issues. Not only would U.S. employers miss out on American-educated talent, but we would be handing this talent to our competitors abroad. Indeed, foreign countries are updating their immigration policies to attract this highly educated talent, making the competition to retain the best and the brightest that much more difficult for the United States to win. The exhaustion of this fiscal year’s visa numbers also has made it more difficult for Americans to receive needed services. For instance, it is not commonly known that H-1B professionals serve as doctors, teachers and researchers, and work to develop products and services that improve the lives of Americans. H-1B professionals include psychologists and special education instructors who work with the mentally challenged, engineers who design tunnels and subway corridors that can withstand terrorist attacks, and biomedical researchers central to the fight against cancer, AIDS and other diseases. Without access to these highly educated foreign professionals, America will suffer. Not only will our ability to provide benefits to our own citizens be diminished, but the glow of American innovation that results from having access from the world’s brightest minds may be forever dimmed.

Question: Are there any other options?

Answer: There are other types of nonimmigrant visas such as the O, E, L, and other H’s. You should definitely look into those other options and not go out of status.

Brian D. Lerner is an Immigration Attorney Specialist. This firm does every aspect of immigration law including family and employment based petitions, deportation defense and criminal related immigration issues, asylum, naturalization, appeals, nonimmigrant visas, immigrant visas, and all other areas of immigration law. An appointment can be made by calling (866) 495-0554 or (562) 495-0554. The Firm website is www.californiaimmigration.us.

I can get my Green Card back after having a deportation order?

Question: I was young and committed in a crime in 1994. Even though I had my Green Card for years, I was put into deportation proceedings in 2001 and was ordered deported. I am still in the U.S. Is there anything I can do?

Answer: The Department of Justice (Department) published a proposed rule to permit certain lawful permanent residents (LPRs) to apply for relief under former section 212(c) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, from deportation or removal based on certain criminal convictions before April 1, 1997. Certain LPRs who plead guilty or nolo contendre to crimes before April 1, 1997, may seek section 212(c) relief from being deported or removed from the United States on account of those pleas. Under this rule, eligible LPRs currently in immigration proceedings (and former LPRs under a final order of deportation or removal) who have not departed from the United States may file a request to apply for relief under former section 212(c) of the Act, as in effect on the date of their plea, regardless of the date the plea agreement was entered by the court. This rule is applicable only to certain eligible aliens who were convicted pursuant to plea agreements made prior to April 1, 1997.

Question: I have already lost at the Board of Immigration Appeals and am now appealing to the Circuit Court. What must I do at this point?

Answer: Based upon the regulations, you should request that the Circuit Court hold the case without processing it. Simultaneously, you should file a Motion to Reopen the case under 212(c) under this special rule to the Board of Immigration Appeals. If granted, the Board of Immigration Appeals will send the case back down to the Immigration Judge for hearings on 212(c).

Question: I have a friend in a similar situation who was actually deported back to his home country. Will he qualify to make the Motion to Reopen?

Answer: Under the new regulations, the answer is no. Unfortunately, the logic of the regulations is that they could have asked for various federal court relief or a stay of deportation, and therefore, their cases are closed and are no longer eligible for 212(c) relief.

Question: What if a person had a jury trial instead of pleaing guilty?

Answer: Again, they do not qualify for this 212(c) Motion to Reopen. They must have plead guilty, no contest or nolo contendre. There are other ways of fighting the battle to try to get 212(c) relief in federal courts. However, a straight forward Motion to Reopen will not work.

Question: Is there a time deadline in which to apply?

Answer: Yes. There will be a window of 180 days to apply. If you are unsure as to the exact date, you should get your motion filed as soon as possible.

Brian D. Lerner is an Immigration Attorney Specialist. This firm does every aspect of immigration law including family and employment based petitions, deportation defense and criminal related immigration issues, asylum, naturalization, appeals, nonimmigrant visas, immigrant visas, and all other areas of immigration law. An appointment can be made by calling (866) 495-0554 or (562) 495-0554. The Firm website is www.californiaimmigration.us.

Have $1,000,000 for a Green Card?

Question: I am a wealthy businessman and would like to find some expedited way to get into the U.S. Can you let me know if there are other alternatives to the lengthy several year Labor Certification process?

Answer: The Immigrant Investor Pilot Program (“Pilot Program”) was created on October 6, 1992. This is a variation of a program known as the EB-5 Investor Program. The Pilot Program began in accordance with a Congressional mandate aimed at stimulating economic activity and creating jobs for U.S. workers, while simultaneously affording eligible aliens the opportunity to become lawful permanent residents. Through this innovative program, foreign investors are encouraged to invest funds in an economic unit known as a “Regional Center.” A Regional Center is defined as any economic unit, public or private, engaged in the promotion of economic growth, improved regional productivity, job creation and increased domestic capital investment. Presently up to 3000 immigrant visas are set aside each year for the Pilot Program. As of June 1, 2004, a total of 26 Regional Centers have been designated by the legacy Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) and today, the U.S. Citizenship and Immigrations Services (USCIS).

Question: What must I do to get an approval for a Regional Center?

Answer: The basic requirements for Regional Center designation are 1) Applicants must show how their proposed program will focus on a geographic region; promote economic growth through increased export sales, if applicable; promote improved regional productivity; create a minimum of 10 direct or indirect jobs per investor; increase domestic capital investment; be promoted and publicized to prospective investors; have a positive impact on the regional or national economy through increased household earnings; and generate a greater demand for business services, utilities maintenance and repair, and construction jobs both in and around the center.

Question: How much must I invest?

Answer: The capital investment requirement for any EB-5 investor, inside or outside of a Regional Center is $1 million. The capital investment requirement for an EB-5 investor in a Targeted Employment Area (TEA) or a Rural Area (RA) is $500,000. A TEA is a geographic area or political subdivision located within a metropolitan statistical area or within a city or town with a population in excess of 20,000 with an unemployment level at least 150% of the national unemployment rate. A RA is a geographical area that is outside a metropolitan statistical area, or part of the outer boundary of any city or town having a population of 20,000 or less as shown by population indicators. In certain areas involving a sparsely populated state, an approved statewide Regional Center likely encompasses both TEAs and RAs.

Thus, if you can establish the business in a TEA or RA, you will be able to save $500,000 of the investment. If approved, you will get a conditional Green Card which will allow you be a Lawful Permanent Resident. Then within two years you must file a petition to remove the conditional residency. The USCIS wants to make certain that you simply did not put down $1,000,000 and then not actually follow through with your business. However, this is certainly a much faster way of obtaining the Green Card if you qualify.

Brian D. Lerner is an Immigration Attorney Specialist. This firm does every aspect of immigration law including family and employment based petitions, deportation defense and criminal related immigration issues, asylum, naturalization, appeals, nonimmigrant visas, immigrant visas, and all other areas of immigration law. An appointment can be made by calling (866) 495-0554 or (562) 495-0554. The Firm website is www.californiaimmigration.us.