• Hours & Info

    3233 E. Broadway,
    Long Beach, CA 90803
    (562) 495-0554
    M-F: 8:00am - 6:00 p.m.
    Sat: 9:00 a.m. - 12:00 p.m.

  • Past Blog Posts

  • https://api.whatsapp.com/send?phone=13104885414

Where have my dreams have gone?

Posted on December 16, 2009 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney

Question: I was just a little child when my parents came to the United States with my family. Our visas expired and I have been out of status for many years. I have done very well in high school and now want to attend college. Eventually, I want to become a doctor. However, at every turn is my illegal status. Unfortunately, colleges do not want to take me because I am here illegally. Now I have to work menial jobs and cannot realize my dreams of becoming a doctor and helping people. What can I do?

Answer: There may be a Bill in Congress that could soon become law. It is very much made for persons in your situation. Persons that are victims of the immigration laws and are stuck with nowhere to go. It is known as the DREAM Act. Last week it was in the Senate Judiciary Committee. By marking up and passing the DREAM Act (S. 1545), the Senate Judiciary Committee took an important step to remove one of the barriers that deserving children face in their quest to attend colleges and legalize their status in the United States.

The DREAM Act would return to the states the authority to determine who qualifies for in-state tuition. The bill also would legalize the status of those young people who meet certain criteria, including having good moral character and having lived in the U.S. for at least five years preceding the Act’s passage.

America benefits when all people have the opportunity to contribute to society and the economy. The DREAM Act will facilitate that opportunity for deserving kids, by removing some of the barriers to their attending college and gaining legal status. It not only makes economic sense, but it is the right thing to do.

Question: Did this Bill pass by a wide margin?

Answer: By a 16-3 vote, the Senate Judiciary Committee passed the DREAM Act (Development, Relief, and Education for Alien Minors Act of 2003), despite the strong efforts of restrictionists on and off Capitol Hill to defeat this measure. However, the bill passed only after the Committee approved a damaging amendment.

Question: Is the DREAM Act law?

Answer: No, not yet. Now it must go to the House to act on companion legislation, the Student Adjustment Act (H.R. 1684), introduced by Representatives Chris Cannon (R-UT), Howard Berman (D-CA), and Lucille Roybal-Allard (D-CA).

However, it does seem there is momentum for this Bill. Thus, we will see if it is passed. However, if you are in a situation where you need to have this type of legislation, help may soon be on its way.

Filed under: Congress, DREAM Act, Immigration, Immigration Law, immigration provisions | Tagged: , | Leave a comment »

What help can people get from Hurricane Katrina?

Posted on December 16, 2009 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney

Question: I have many friends who are not U.S. Citizens who were displaced by Hurricane Katrina. What is happening with their families and petitions?

Answer: First, it is necessary to determine the physical status of USCIS facilities in the affected area.

On Friday, September 2, 2005, USCIS surveyed the status of the USCIS District Office in New Orleans (NOL) at 701 Loyola Avenue. There was no window damage, no water damage, and the office was secure. It appears that nothing was disrupted, and the files and security items are safe. Two USCIS employees in the affected region remain unaccounted for. All other USCIS facilities in the Gulf Coast Region are secure.

Due to the high volume of displaced persons, ALL USCIS offices will be assisting hurricane victims in any way possible.

The New Orleans District Director is conducting business from the USCIS Sub-office at 1341 Sycamore View Road in Memphis, Tennessee. The Continuity of Operations (COOP) site for NOL is the ASC facility at 100 West Capitol Street in Jackson, Mississippi. The COOP site in Jackson is open for business and will be staffed by NOL personnel in the coming days.

Question: Where are the NOL office files going to be centralized?

Answer: Planning is underway to centralize the files from the NOL district office. However, it may be sometime before USCIS will be able to enter the NOL office to remove and relocate files.

Question: Has USCIS cancelled naturalization ceremonies in the affected areas?

Answer: All naturalization ceremonies in the affected areas have been cancelled until further notice and will be rescheduled. Customers with pending appointments for naturalization interviews and adjustment of status interviews will be contacted as soon as information becomes available.

Question: Are there plans to shift jurisdiction for customers from the New Orleans District?

Answer: It will be necessary to shift jurisdiction for customers from the New Orleans office to other local offices throughout the country. USCIS Regional Directors are working together to develop a plan that maintains the commitment to customer service and efficiency. Operational activities continue in Fort Smith, Arkansas, Memphis, Tennessee, and now, Jackson, Mississippi.

Question: How do affected customers go about replacing lost immigration documentation?

Answer: All USCIS field offices will be prepared to assist hurricane victims in any way possible and work to replace official documentation while adhering to security policies and procedures. USCIS will verify the identity and immigration status of all customers before re-issuing any immigration related document. Such verification can be achieved by using their electronic systems.

Question: What steps is USCIS taking to facilitate the deployment of relief workers from abroad?

Answer: USCIS is working closely with officials at the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to consider options to parole certain foreign skilled technicians, i.e. electricians, general contractors, construction and recovery specialists. Under these regulations, the new parolees will need to apply for an Employment Authorization Document since the activity is considered employment in the United States.

Question: How will USCIS handle foreign students who will not be able to maintain continuous enrollment in affected universities?

Answer: The Student and Exchange Visitor Program (SEVP), housed at the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), is in the process of issuing guidance to students and schools, addressing individual scenarios.

There is still a need to help these displaced immigrants. Therefore, if you have anything to give to Red Cross to help, please do so.

Brian D. Lerner is an Immigration Attorney Specialist. This firm does every aspect of immigration law including family and employment based petitions, deportation defense and criminal related immigration issues, asylum, naturalization, appeals, nonimmigrant visas, immigrant visas, and all other areas of immigration law. An appointment can be made by calling  (866) 495-0554  or  (562) 495-0554 . The Firm website is www.californiaimmigration.us.

Filed under: Immigration, Immigration Law, immigration provisions, USCIS | Tagged: | Leave a comment »

What new Bills are on the Horizon?

Posted on December 16, 2009 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney

Question: I have heard that there are a large number of new immigration bills that are in Congress. Can you give a summary?

Answer: Yes, there are a significant number of bills. Whether they actually become law will only be determined by time. However, it does appear that there should be a significant number of changes in the coming year. Below are just a few of the bills introduced.

The Uniting American Families Act or the Permanent Partners Immigration Act: Introduced on June 21 by Senator Patrick Leahy (D-VT), S. 1278 would provide a mechanism for U.S. citizens and lawful permanent residents to sponsor their permanent partners for residence in the United States. S. 1278 defines the term “permanent partner” to mean an individual 18 years of age or older who (a) is in a committed, intimate relationship with another individual 18 years of age or older in which both parties intend a lifelong commitment; (b) is financially interdependent with that other individual; (c) is not married to or in a permanent partnership with anyone other than that other individual; (d) is unable to contract with that other individual a marriage cognizable under the INA; and (e) is not a first, second, or third degree blood relation of that other individual. The bill is companion legislation to H.R. 3006 below.

The Unaccompanied Alien Child Protection Act of 2005: Introduced on January 24, 2005, by Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-CA), S. 119 would build upon the Homeland Security Act, which transferred the care and custody of unaccompanied alien children from the former INS to the Department of Health and Human Services’ Office of Refugee Resettlement (ORR). Among other things, the bill would ensure that unaccompanied alien children have access to counsel; give ORR the authority to provide guardians to such children; establish minimum standards for the care and custody of unaccompanied alien minors; and strengthen policies for permanent protection of unaccompanied alien children. The bill is similar to legislation that Senator Feinstein introduced in the 108th Congress.

The Civil Liberties Restoration Act: Introduced on April 6 by Representative Howard Berman (D-CA), H.R. 1502 seeks to roll back some of the most egregious post-9/11 policies and strike an appropriate balance between security needs and liberty interests. Among other things, H.R. 1502 would secure due process protections and civil liberties for non-citizens in the U.S., enhance the effectiveness of our nation’s enforcement activities, restore the confidence of immigrant communities in the fairness of our government, and facilitate our efforts at promoting human rights and democracy around the world.

The Secure America and Orderly Immigration Act: Introduced on May 12 by Senators John McCain (R-AZ), Edward Kennedy (D-MA) and others, S. 1033 would comprehensively reform our immigration laws so that they enhance our national security and address the concerns of American businesses and families. Among other things, the bill would establish a break-the-mold new essential worker visa program (the H-5A visa) while also providing a mechanism by which eligible undocumented immigrants present in the U.S. on the date of the bill’s introduction could adjust to temporary nonimmigrant (H-5B) status; promote family unity and reduce backlogs; call for the creation and implementation of a national strategy for border security and enhanced border intelligence; create new enforcement regimes; and promote circular migration patterns. House companion legislation (H.R. 2330) was introduced on May 12 by Representatives Jim Kolbe (R-AZ), Jeff Flake (R-AZ), and Luis Gutierrez (D-IL).

The Agricultural Job Opportunities, Benefits, and Security (AgJobs) Act of 2005: Introduced on February 10, 2005 by Senators Larry Craig (R-ID) and Edward Kennedy (D-MA), S. 359 would create an earned adjustment program for undocumented farm workers who would be eligible to apply for temporary immigration status based on their past work experience, and could become permanent residents upon satisfying prospective work requirements. The legislation would also streamline the existing H-2A foreign agricultural worker program while preserving and enhancing key labor protections. Representatives Chris Cannon (R-UT) and Howard Berman (D-CA) introduced a companion measure in the House (H.R. 884). The bill is similar to legislation that the two Senators introduced in the 108th Congress.

The Save America Comprehensive Immigration Act of 2005: Introduced on May 4 by Representative Sheila Jackson Lee (D-TX), H.R. 2092 would, among many other things, increase the allocation of family-based immigrant visas; provide age-out protection for children; provide earned access to legalization; provide adjustment of status for certain children; update the registry provisions; and enhance border security.

We have fought long and hard to try to get reform of unfair immigration laws, and hopefully, this will be the year that much of the positive reform happens.

Filed under: Congress, Immigration, Immigration Law, immigration provisions, USCIS | Tagged: , | Leave a comment »

H-1B’s

Posted on December 16, 2009 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney

The H-1B’s are about to close. Get the petition filed right now to have a realistic chance of still getting in.

Filed under: H-1B, Immigration, Immigration Law, immigration provisions, USCIS | Tagged: | 1 Comment »

I can get a temporary work permit?

Posted on December 15, 2009 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney

Question: An employer wants to petition me for the next 6 months because of my knowledge in his industry. I do not seem to qualify for any types of visas that I know about. Do you have any ideas?

Answer: Yes. You may qualify for the H-2B. The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has just announced that, as required under the recently-enacted Save Our Small and Seasonal Businesses Act of 2005 (“the Act”), the agency will begin to accept additional petitions for H-2B workers as of May 25, 2005. Under the Act, the USCIS has been granted a waiver of the normal requirement to issue regulations implementing the new law. Therefore, in order to implement these new provisions expeditiously, the USCIS has issued a Public Notice detailing filing requirements and procedures, and does not intend to supplement it with any further notice or regulation.

Question: Who Can Benefit From The Act?

Answer: Beginning on Wednesday, May 25, 2005, the USCIS started accepting filings for two types of H-2B workers: 1) For Fiscal Year 2005: Approximately 35,000 workers, who are new H-2B workers or who are not certified as “returning workers” (as explained further below) seeking start dates before October 1, 2005. 2) For Fiscal Year 2005 and 2006: All “returning [H-2B] workers,” meaning workers who were counted against the annual H-2B cap of 66,000 during any one of the three fiscal years preceding the fiscal year of the requested start date. In other words: (a) in a petition for a start date before October 1, 2005 (i.e., for FY 2005), the worker must have been previously approved for a start date in H-2B status between October 1, 2001 and September 30, 2004; (b) in a petition for a start date on or after October 1, 2005 (i.e., for FY 2006), the worker must have been previously approved for a start date in H-2B status between October 1, 2002 and September 30, 2005.

Question: What Is A Returning Worker?

Answer: If a previous petition for an H-2B worker was approved for an extension of stay, change in the terms of employment, or change or addition of employers, the worker was not counted against the annual cap at that time; therefore, that particular approval cannot in itself result in the worker being considered a “returning worker” for purposes of filing a new petition now. As a general rule, only previous petitions for a change of status or new employment that were filed during the requisite three-year period before the requested start date will qualify a worker as a “returning worker.” Any worker not certified as a “returning worker” will be subject to the numerical limitation for the relevant fiscal year.

Question: What Are The Filing Requirements?

Employers wishing to file petitions for H-2B workers who qualify under the Act should follow all current requirements, as well as the following additional requirements for returning workers: The petition must include a certification from the employer, signed by the same person who signs the I-129 form, stating, “As a supplement to the certification made on the attached I-129, I further certify that the workers listed below have entered the United States in H-2B status or changed to H-2B status during one of the last three fiscal years.” The list must set forth the full name of the worker(s). If the petition seeks a change of status, it must include evidence of previous H-2B admissions (i.e., a copy of each worker’s visa and I-94 admission record).

A single petition may be filed on behalf of multiple workers, including unnamed workers in “special filing situations” for business reasons. However, any returning workers must be listed in a certification as described above. For multiple-named workers, including returning workers, “Attachment 1” to Form I-129 must be included and completed. This is a supplement to the new I-129 form on which the names and other biographic information of multiple workers must be listed.

As usual, each petition must include a labor certification from the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL). The USCIS will accept a copy of the labor certification in those cases where the original labor certification has previously been filed with the USCIS. (Note that the USCIS and DOL both published proposed regulations in January 2005 that would substantially revamp the labor certification application process for H-2B workers and would replace the current procedure with a one-step, electronically-filed, attestation-based petition that would bypass the DOL and be filed directly with the USCIS.

Approval notices issued under the Act will include the names of all returning workers listed on the petition. Each worker must be prepared to show to the U.S. consulate abroad (when applying for an H-2B visa) or to the inspector at the port of entry (if the worker is exempt from the visa requirement) proof of his or her previous H-2B admissions (e.g., a previous H-2B visa in the worker’s passport, and a copy of a prior I-94 admission document). Although the Department of State will seek to confirm prior visas through its electronic system, an applicant for an H-2B visa under the returning worker provision who does not show these documents may be denied a visa and/or be denied admission when traveling to the United States.

Premium processing is available by including a Form I-907 and an additional $1,000 fee. Petitions for start dates of October 1, 2005, or later must include a new anti-fraud fee in the amount of $150.

Question: What New Sanctions Does the Act Include?

Answer: The Act contains new provisions including sanctions and civil monetary penalties (up to $10,000 per violation) for failure to meet any of the H-2B petition conditions for willful misrepresentation of a material fact. These new provisions become effective on October 1, 2005.

Question: What Happens When the Annual Cap is Reached?

Answer: Whenever the annual H-2B numerical limitation has been reached, the USCIS will reject any additional filings that are subject to the cap (i.e., other than for returning workers, extension of stay, change of employers, or change in terms of employment). For FY 2006 filings, the Act provides that the numerical limit for the first six months of the fiscal year shall be no more than 33,000, with the remaining 33,000 to be allocated on or after April 1, 2006. Employers may file H-2B petitions no more than six months in advance of the requested start date.

Filed under: H-2B, Immigration, Immigration Law, USCIS, Work Visa | Tagged: , | Leave a comment »

New Affidavit of Support Requirements.

Posted on December 15, 2009 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney

Question: I heard that there are new requirements for the affidavit of support requirements. Can you let me know what they are?

Answer: A person completing an Affidavit of Support (Form I-864) on behalf of an adjustment of status applicant is now only required to file one Federal income tax return, for the tax year that is most recent as of the date the Form I-864 was signed, rather than having to submit a Federal income tax return for each of the three most recent tax years.

Question: Can you clarify exactly what year you must now submit the tax returns?

Answer: For any Form I-485 filed on or after the date of this memorandum, the sponsor shall not be required to file any Federal income tax return for any year other than the tax year immediately preceding the sponsor’s signing of the Form I-864. For example, if the sponsor signed the Form I-864 after April 15, 2005, only the sponsor’s 2004 Federal income tax return would be required. However, the sponsor may file the three most recent returns if the sponsor believes that the additional returns will make it more likely that the Form I-864 will be found to be sufficient. This rule shall apply to petitioning sponsors, as well as substitute or joint sponsors signing a Form I-864 for an adjustment case.

Question: How does the officer determine the sufficiency of the I-864?

Answer: USCIS officers shall, as a general rule, determine the sufficiency of a Form I-864 based upon whether evidence shows that the annual income at the applicable threshold set forth in the Form I-864P, Poverty Guidelines, from the calendar year in which the Form I-864 was filed. Accordingly, adjudicators will determine whether the current income listed on Form I-864 is at least 125% (or 100% as applicable) of the governing threshold set forth in the Poverty Guidelines. Adjudicators will also determine whether the sponsor’s total income (line 22 on the 2004 IRS Form 1040, line 15 on the 2004 IRS Form 1040A), or adjusted gross income for those who filed IRS Form I040EZ (line 4 of the 2004IRS Form I040EZ), meets the Poverty Guidelines threshold. The adjudicator should request additional evidence (i.e., employment letter(s), pay stub(s), or other financial data) only if the tax return reflects income below the Form I-864P, Poverty Guidelines and the record does not already contain additional evidence that would establish the sponsor meets the current income requirements. The adjudicator should also request additional evidence (i.e., employment letter(s), pay stub(s), or other financial data) if there is a specific reason (other than the passage of time) to question the veracity of the income stated on Form I-864 or the accompanying document(s).

If the officer determines that the tax return and/or the evidence in the file do not establish that the sponsor meets the government Form I-864P, Poverty Guidelines threshold, the adjudicator shall request current year income information, not additional information from the year the sponsor signed Form I-864. In this situation, the sufficiency of the Form I-864 is determined based upon the additional evidence as it relates to the applicable threshold set forth in the Form I-864P from current year rather than the Form I-864P, Poverty Guidelines from the calendar year in which the Form I-864 was signed.

Question: Can each immigration office have a different policy than stated above?

Answer: Previously USCIS has permitted each local office to establish its own policy on whether to require submission of Form I-864 at the time of filing for adjustment or at the time of the adjustment interview. Effective as of now, all applicants are required to submit Form I-864 with their adjustment application.

Filed under: Affidavit of Support, Immigrant Visa, Immigration, Immigration Law, USCIS | Tagged: , | Leave a comment »

What exactly is the ‘Prevailing Wage’?

Posted on December 15, 2009 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney

Question: What changes to the prevailing wage process are caused by the H-1B Visa Reform Act of 2004?

Answer: The two changes to the prevailing wage determination process for foreign labor certification due to the H-1B Visa Reform Act (effective on March 8, 2005) are: The wage required to be paid shall be 100 percent of the prevailing wage; and where the Secretary of Labor uses, or makes available to employers, a governmental survey to determine the prevailing wage, such survey shall provide at least 4 levels of wages commensurate with experience, education, and the level of supervision.

Question: What changes to the prevailing wage process are caused by the publication of the Labor Certification for the Permanent Employment of Aliens in the United States, or PERM, regulation?

Answer: The PERM regulation (effective date of March 28, 2005) modified the prevailing wage determination process in three significant ways. (1) The use of Davis-Bacon or the McNamara-O’Hara Service Contract Act is no longer controlling for prevailing wage determinations although an employer may request that either be considered as an employer-provided wage source. (2) If an employer-provided survey does not contain an arithmetic mean, and only provides a median, the median wage figure can be used for determining the prevailing wage.

Question: When and where does the employer obtain prevailing wage information when filing a PERM application?

Answer: Prior to filing the Application for Permanent Employment Certification, ETA Form 9089, the employer must request a prevailing wage determination from the State Workforce Agency (SWA) having jurisdiction over the proposed area of intended employment. The employer is required to include on the ETA Form 9089 the SWA provided information: the prevailing wage, the prevailing wage tracking number (if applicable), the SOC/O*NET(OES) code, the occupation title, the OES skill level (if applicable), the wage source, the determination date, and the expiration date.

Question: How do employers get a prevailing wage if filing an H-1B, H-1B1, or E-3 Labor Condition Application?

Answer: The Immigration and Nationality Act provides that, unlike the other labor certification programs, the employer has the option of using one of three sources: (1) requesting a prevailing wage determination from the appropriate SWA; (2) using a survey conducted by an independent authoritative source; or (3) using another legitimate source of information.

Question: How do employers get a prevailing wage if filing an H-2B temporary nonagricultural labor certification application?

Answer: Employers have the option of using one of three sources: (1) requesting a prevailing wage determination from the appropriate SWA; (2) using a survey conducted by an independent authoritative source; or (3) using another legitimate source of information. Otherwise, the prevailing wage for an H-2B application is provided by the SWA as part of the standard processing of the application.

Question: Can wage information be obtained over the telephone?

Answer: No. Prevailing wage determinations will not be provided over the phone. All prevailing wage determinations provided by the State Workforce Agencies must be in writing.

Question: Where can an employer get a prevailing wage request form from the State Workforce Agency (SWA)?

Answer: Employers must request and receive the determination of the prevailing wage from the SWA having jurisdiction over the geographic area of intended employment. Many SWAs provide prevailing wage request forms electronically through their own websites. If the form is not available electronically, the employer should contact the SWA representative and request the form be faxed or mailed.

Question: What are the primary factors to be considered in making the prevailing wage determination?

Answer: Determining the appropriate wage level depends on full consideration of the experience, education, and skills required by the employer as indicators of the complexity of the job duties, the level of judgment required and the amount of supervision involved. The step-by-step process provided in the guidance is not intended to be an automatic process. The wage level assigned to a prevailing wage request should be commensurate with the wage level definitions.

Question: How does the SWA determine the prevailing wage?

Answer: If the SWA determines the job opportunity is covered by a collective bargaining agreement (CBA) negotiated at arms length and a wage rate has been negotiated under the agreement as evidenced by information provided by the employer, than the CBA wage rate is the prevailing wage.

Question: Are the SWAs instructed to process prevailing wage determinations on a first in, first out (FIFO) basis?

Answer: SWAs generally process prevailing wage determinations on a FIFO basis.

Question: What is the average processing time for the SWA to respond to a prevailing wage request?

Answer: Although the time frames vary from state to state due to the number of requests pending at the time of submission, SWAs generally provide responses within 14 business days of the receipt of the request. If the employer provides its own survey, responses to such requests are generally done within 30 business days of the receipt of the request.

Question: How can an employer check the status of a prevailing wage request?

Answer: An employer can check the status of a prevailing wage request by contacting the SWA. However, an employer should take into consideration the fact that frequent calls to the SWA may result in more time responding to such requests rather than processing the request itself.

Question: Does the offered wage need to be included in the advertisement?

Answer: The offered wage does not need to be included in the advertisement for applications for permanent labor certification, but if a wage rate is included, it must be at or above the prevailing wage rate. The wage offer does need to be stated in the advertisements for H-2B applications.

Filed under: H-1B, Immigration, Immigration Law, immigration provisions, Prevailing Wage | Tagged: , | Leave a comment »

212(c) Deportation Relief Expanded.

Posted on December 15, 2009 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney

Question: I have been in the U.S. for the last 25 years and committed only 1 crime in 1996. However, I am in deportation now and they claim that I am an aggravated felon and not eligible for 212(c) relief and that I will be deported for the rest of my life. I committed the crime in August of 1996, and plead guilty the following October. Is there anything I can do to avoid deportation?

Answer: If you happen to live in the jurisdiction of the 9th Circuit you are in luck. If you live elsewhere, I would get a good immigration attorney to fight for you up to the appellate level to make the same similar arguments that were made in the newly published 9th circuit case. First, it is necessary to have a little background. In 1996, Congress passed IIRAIRA which expanded quite considerably the definition of what crimes constitute an aggravated felony. It also repealed or took away 212(c) relief. This is a type of relief whereby if a person had a certain number of years in the U.S. as a lawful permanent resident and committed a crime that was not an aggravated felony (basically any crime that they received less than five years of jail time), they could apply for this relief in deportation proceedings. If they won, they would get their Green Card back and could remain in the U.S.

From 1996 until sometime in 2001, every court was denying 212(c) relief because it was repealed by IIRAIRA. However, the Supreme Court of the United States came out with a case called St… Cyr. Which essentially stated that it was unconstitutional to retroactively apply IIRAIRA to these people. It stated that if someone PLEAD guilty before April of 1996, that they could now apply for 212(c).

While St.. Cyr was a great case, it left a group of people out of its ruling that were similarly situated, but did not fall under the exact parameters of this case. It was those people who COMMITTED the crime before the passage of IIRAIRA, but were CONVICTED after the passage. In these cases, these people for all these years have not been eligible for 212(c) and have been deported for the rest of their lives.

Question: What did this new case rule?

Answer: Cordes v. Gonzales held that post-IIRIRA case law (namely INS v. St. Cyr) limiting the availability of §212(c) relief, to legal permanent residents who had not committed deportable offenses at the time of their conviction offends equal protection when §212(c) is available to similarly situated permanent residents who committed deportable offenses at the time of their conviction. The “only discernible difference” between the two groups, the court said, is that “those entitled to section 212(c) relief faced deportation at the time they entered their guilty pleas.” “This difference, however, is ‘irrelevant and fortuitous’ since the [immigrant in this case] quite obviously faces deportation now,” the court said. The court also found there is no rational basis for the disparate treatment of lawful permanent residents who are eligible for §212(c) relief under St. Cyr based on the “ironic fortune of facing the prospect of deportation at the time that they entered their guilty pleas” and permanent residents, like Petitioner, who are not eligible simply because their crime was not serious enough to render them deportable at the time they pled guilty. The court said:

“Allowing permanent residents who have committed worse crimes than Cordes to apply for section 212(c) relief, while denying the same opportunity to Cordes, does not achieve Congress’ express purpose behind the expanded definition of aggravated felony and its retroactive application: to expeditiously remove criminal aliens and make it more difficult for them to obtain relief from removal. Indeed, the disparate grant of section 212(c) relief here does not increase the total number of criminal aliens subject to removal, as Congress intended, but rather perversely increases only the number of less dangerous criminals subject to removal.”

Thus, this case now opens up the possibility of applying for 212(c) relief to those previously not eligible (at least in the 9th circuit court of appeals) and gives a much better fighting position to those in other jurisdictions to fight on this same basis.

Filed under: 212(c), Deportation, Immigration, Immigration Law, immigration provisions | Tagged: , | 2 Comments »

What is Registry?

Posted on December 15, 2009 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney

Question: I have been in the U.S. for over 30 years. I’m illegal here, but cannot seem to find a way to get my status. Is there anything I can do?

Answer: If you have been present in the United States since January 1, 1972, you may be eligible for the “registry” provisions of our immigration laws which would allow you to obtain lawful permanent residence even if you are illegally in the United States now, or if you initially entered the U.S. illegally.

Question: Where Can I Find the Law?

Answer: The part of the law concerning the registry provisions is located at INA §249. The specific eligibility requirements and procedures for becoming a permanent resident through registry are included in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) at 8 CFR 1259 .

Question: Who Is Eligible?

Answer: You are eligible to apply for permanent residence based on 8 CFR 1259 if you: Entered the United States prior to January 1, 1972; Have continuously resided in the United States since entry; Are a person of good moral character; Are neither ineligible for citizenship, except for the requirement of five years of lawful permanent residence, nor inadmissible for participation in terrorist activities, certain criminal or security grounds, or for alien smuggling and never participated in Nazi persecutions or genocide.

Any alien who has at any time engaged in terrorist activities is ineligible for registry. Further, any alien who fails to appear at a removal hearing, or who fails to depart after agreeing to voluntary departure, is ineligible for registry for a period of ten years.

Question: How Do I Apply?

Answer: You must submit a completed Form I-485 with filing fee, and a completed Form G-325A with evidence that you have continuously resided in the United States prior to January 1, 1972, to the USCIS district office having jurisdiction over the place in which you live. You must establish that you are eligible and that registry should be granted in the exercise of discretion. There is no appeal from the decision of the District Director but your application may be renewed in front of an Immigration Judge.

Question: Will I Get a Work Permit?

Answer: Applicants who are inside the United States and have filed Form I-485 (Application to Register Permanent Residence or Adjust Status) are eligible to apply for a work permit while their case is pending. You should use Form I-765 to apply for a work permit.

You do not need to apply for a work permit once you are accorded permanent resident status. As a lawful permanent resident, you should receive a permanent resident card that will provide evidence that you have a right to live and work in the United States permanently.

Question: Can I Travel outside the United States while I am waiting for my application under the registry provision to be processed?

Answer: If an alien obtains Advance Parole from the USCIS following approval of a Form I-131, he or she may travel outside of the United States and return without jeopardizing their registry application. However, any alien who has accrued more than 180 days of unlawful presence in the United States and then travels outside the United States is inadmissible for a period of 3 to 10 years. Registry applicants have, by definition, accrued long periods of time in unlawful status. If you are applying for permanent residence using the section 249 registry provisions, you should not travel outside of the United States without first obtaining advance parole from the Service, or you will be unable to return to the United States.

Filed under: Advance Parole, Immigration, Immigration Law, Registry, USCIS | Tagged: , | Leave a comment »

The New Year’s Hope for Immigration

Posted on December 15, 2009 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney

Question: I have been fighting my case for some time and yet do not have anything. What can I do?

Answer: As the year comes to an end, you need to try to give thanks for what you do have and then start again after the New Year. I am sure that you can appreciate and understand that practically everything is getting more difficult at Immigration. Whether your case is in Immigration Court, on Appeal to the Board of Immigration Appeals or the Circuit Courts or in front of USCIS, things are taking longer. Whether you have a Labor Certification or are applying for a Religious Visa, or a multitude of other types of visas, everything has gotten harder. Whether you are applying for a particular kind of Waiver or relief in Immigration Court, the evidence needed to present is much more than it used to be.

Therefore, you must keep fighting and you must keep your hopes up high. No matter how hard it is to get what you want from Immigration, you can always make a better case than before and you can always submit more evidence. We as a people cannot let the forces at Congress, USCIS, BICE, BCBP, and DOL or any other government agency drive immigrants and nonimmigrants away. If we permit the forces against the natural flow of immigration to win, then the United States will become the opposite of a land of dreams. It will become a land that will become unwelcoming.

As an immigration attorney, I am committed to keeping the fight going. Since IIRAIRA passed in 1996, lawyers across the U.S. have fought against provisions that were hurtful and spiteful to immigrants. Slowly, bit by bit, we have had successes to show that certain parts of legislation aimed against immigrants were unfair or unconstitutional. Now, there are more cases in Circuit Courts across the U.S. that are immigration related than ever before. The Circuit Courts are inundated with immigration cases because we must keep appealing and keep fighting what are laws that are aimed to deprive the immigrant of their dreams. If we give up, then we are validating the unfair laws, the discrimination, and the laws that will keep immigrants out of the U.S.

Therefore, do not despair that it is taking a long time to resolve your visa or your status. Keep in mind that there are multitudes of people in a much worse situation than you. There are people whom did not have anyone to fight for them and have been deported; had their appeals denied; had their Labor Certifications denied or had their relief denied. However, as long as you have an immigration attorney fighting for you, keep up your hope. It is only the fighting by that immigration attorney and other immigration attorneys across the country that will eventually prevail against antiquated laws and the discrimination against immigrants that exists by some of Congress.

It is almost New Year’s. Let’s give thanks for our health and our family. Let’s give thanks that we are still in the U.S. fighting to stay and fighting to get what is deserved. Let’s look at the people who did not win and hope that someday they have a successful return to the U.S. Hope is a powerful emotion and all of us can have hope to get what we eventually want.

I would like to wish all of my readers a Happy and Prosperous New Year’s and a hope that next year will give each and everyone of you prosperity and happiness.

Brian D. Lerner is an Immigration Attorney Specialist. This firm does every aspect of immigration law including family and employment based petitions, deportation defense and criminal related immigration issues, asylum, naturalization, appeals, nonimmigrant visas, immigrant visas, and all other areas of immigration law. An appointment can be made by calling    (866) 495-0554    or    (562) 495-0554   . The Firm website is www.californiaimmigration.us.

Filed under: Congress, Immigration, Immigration Law, immigration provisions, USCIS | Tagged: | Leave a comment »

« Previous Page — Next Page »

  • Brian D. Lerner

    Immigration Lawyer

  • Blog Stats

    • 309,363 Visitors

  • Categories

  • Recent Posts