• Hours & Info

    (562) 495-0554
    M-F: 8:00am - 6:00 p.m.
    Sat: 9:00 a.m. - 12:00 p.m.
  • Past Blog Posts

  • https://api.whatsapp.com/send?phone=13104885414

Lawyers have a Duty to Investigate all Grounds for Asylum

The court denied rehearing and rehearing en banc where the attorneys failed to inquire into and raise FGM as a basis for asylum from Eritrea. Judge Pregerson dissented, citing the adverse effect the decision will have on asylum seekers.

Review the denial of Voluntary Departure

The court held that it lacked jurisdiction to review the denial of voluntary departure for a petitioner who received passport stamps from an undercover agent as part of a sting operation to target corrupt immigration officials. (Pawlowska v. Holder, 10/22/10)

Shooting at an inhabited dwelling or vehicle in violation of CA PC §246 is not a crime of violence

The court held that shooting at an inhabited dwelling or vehicle in violation of Cal. Penal Code §246 is not categorically a crime of violence as defined under 18 USC §16(b). (Covarrubias Teposte v. Holder, 10/26/10)

Aggravated felony crime of violence

crime of violence

Shooting at an inhabited dwelling or vehicle in violation of CA PC §246 is not a crime of violence

Under immigration reform USA, here are exceptions to the priorities of deportation

Conditional parolee not eligible for adjustment of status

The court held that an alien released on conditional parole under INA §236 is not “paroled into the United States” for purposes of eligibility for adjustment of status under INA §245. (Delgado-Sobalvarro v. Att’y Gen. of the U.S., 11/2/10)

Adjustment of Status

Conditional parolee not eligible for adjustment of status

AOS

Misdemeanor false imprisonment in violation of CA Penal Code §236

The court held that misdemeanor false imprisonment in violation of Cal. Penal Code §236 is not categorically a crime involving moral turpitude. (Saavedra-Figueroa v. Holder, 11/5/10)

Misdemeanor false imprisonment in violation of CA Penal Code §236

crime involving moral turpitude

crime of moral turpitude

Wins

Decision to deny administrative closure

The court held that the decision to deny administrative closure is a procedural ruling which the court may review under an abuse of discretion standard to determine whether Petitioner has received a full and fair hearing. (Vahora v. Holder, 11/15/10)

administrative closure

Motion for Administrative Closure

Decision to deny administrative closure

deportation-attorney helps clients in U.S.

Petitioner mental anguish and physical paralysis, constituted past persecution

Over dissent, the court found that the cumulative effect of multiple confrontations and threats by the Communist Secret Police in Mongolia, which caused Petitioner mental anguish and physical paralysis, constituted past persecution. (Javhlan v. Holder, 12/3/10

Past Persecution

Rebut Past Persecution

asylum

Past Persecution: You can still get asylum

For purposes of rescinding an in absentia order

For purposes of rescinding an in absentia order under former INA §242B, the alien must not only establish lack of actual notice, but also that the lack of notice was due to a reason other than failure to provide a current address. (Sanchez v. Holder, 12/6/10)

Reopening an in absentia order

deportat order in absentia

absentia deportation

Motion to Reopen in Absentia Granted

Petitioner’s CAT claim and remanded for reconsideration under the “actual knowledge” or “willful blindness” standard

The court found that the BIA applied an incorrect legal standard in its consideration of Petitioner’s CAT claim and remanded for reconsideration under the “actual knowledge” or “willful blindness” standard. (Hakim v. Holder, 12/13/10)

Petitioner’s CAT claim

CAT

cats

Victory for Due Process of Aliens

Finding No Egregious 4th Amendment Violation

The court refused to suppress evidence of Petitioner’s alienage, finding no egregious 4th Amendment violation where no allegations of misconduct were asserted beyond a claim of a lack of probable cause at the time of his arrest. (Puc-Ruiz v. Holder, 12/23/10)

Finding no egregious 4th Amendment violation

4th amendment

Amendment Violation

4th amendment violation