The respondent’s removability as an alien convicted of an aggravated felony was not established where section 76‑10‑508.1 of the Utah Code was not shown to be divisible with respect to the mens rea necessary for the offense to qualify as a crime of violence under 18 U.S.C. § 16(a)(2012), based on the Supreme Court’s decisions in Mathis v. United States, 136 S. Ct. 2243 (2016), and Descamps v. United States, 133 S. Ct. 2276 (2013). Matter of Chairez, 26 I&N Dec. 349 (BIA 2014), and Matter of Chairez, 26 I&N Dec. 478 (BIA 2015), clarified.
Mens Rea needed for aggravated felony
Related Posts
BIA Dismisses Respondent’s Appeal and Discusses §18.5 of the California Penal Code
The BIA found that the amendment to §18.5 of the California Penal Code, which retroactively lowered the maximum possible sentence that could have been imposed for…
BIA Says DHS Is Not Precluded by Res Judicata from Initiating Separate Proceedings
Declining to follow the Ninth Circuit’s ruling in Bravo-Pedroza v. Gonzales, the BIA held that DHS is not precluded by res judicata from initiating a separate proceeding to…
Court Says Conviction for Evading Arrest in Texas Is Not Categorically a Crime Involving Moral Turpitude
The Fifth Circuit vacated the BIA’s decision and remanded, holding that the petitioner’s conviction for evading arrest under Texas Penal Code §38.04 was not categorically a…
Crime of Moral turpitude found
Assault with a deadly weapon or force likely to produce great bodily injury under California law is categorically a crime involving moral turpitude. Ceron v. Holder,…
Sexual violation case ruled upon
A sexual offense in violation of a statute enacted to protect children is a crime involving moral turpitude where the victim is particularly young—that is,…