The court held that the BIA did not err in concluding that the departure bar under 8 CFR §1003.2(d) divested it of jurisdiction to consider a sua sponte motion to reopen where the petitioner had already been removed. (Zhang v. Holder, 8/12/10)
BIA Jurisdiction on MTR under the Departure Bar
Related Posts
Circuit Court Strikes Down Matter of S-O-G- & F-D-B-
The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals issued a ruling in Chavez Gonzalez v. Garland, which repealed Matter of S-O-G- & F-D-B-, holding that the Attorney…
EOIR Announces Appointment of 24 New Immigration Judges
EOIR announced the appointment of 24 new immigration judges, including four Assistant Chief Immigration Judges and two Unit Chief Immigration Judges. The memo provides a…
TPS applicants from five designated countries can now file initial applications online
USCIS announced that TPS applicants who are eligible nationals of Burma, Somalia, Syria, Venezuela or Yemen can now file Form I-821, Application for Temporary Protected…
BIA Finds IJs and the Board Lack Authority to Recognize the Equitable Defense of Laches in Removal Proceedings
The BIA found the respondent did not submit sufficient objective evidence to support his fear of torture by the Rwandan government and that immigration judges…
USCIS Expands Credit Card Payments
USCIS announced that the Nebraska Service Center (NSC) will accept credit card payments using Form G-1450 for petitioners filing Form I-140, Immigrant Petition for Alien…