The Second Circuit vacated the judgment of the district court and remanded, holding that USCIS is required by the INA’s portability provisions to give pre-revocation notice to the beneficiary or to the successor employer that it is revoking an I-140 petition filed by a previous employer.
https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/porting/
https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/i140/
https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/derivative-beneficiary/
Filed under: Immigration Attorney, Porting | Tagged: Derivative beneficiary, i-40, i140, Porting | Leave a comment »
