• Hours & Info

    3233 E. Broadway,
    Long Beach, CA 90803
    (562) 495-0554
    M-F: 8:00am - 6:00 p.m.
    Sat: 9:00 a.m. - 12:00 p.m.

  • Past Blog Posts

  • https://api.whatsapp.com/send?phone=13104885414

Is the U.S. engaging in Racial Profiling?

Posted on February 2, 2026 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney

December 16, 2002 was the first “special registration call-in” program deadline. The program deadline required all males 16 years of age or older, who are citizens or nationals of one of five designated countries, and who entered the US as non-immigrants before September 10, 2002, to have registered to be fingerprinted and photographed.

A subsequent January 10, 2003 deadline applies to nationals from 13 more countries, and a February 21, 2003 deadline applies to nationals from another two countries.

This measure is yet another false solution to a real problem. Call-in registration offers us little protection because it targets people based on national origin, race and religion, rather than on intelligence information, and alienates the very communities whose cooperation we need. To make matters worse, the registration process is being wrongly applied. Instead of identifying terrorists, the INS in some local offices has used the special registration procedure to identify and detain people who are on the path to permanent residence, but are “out of status” — sometimes through no fault of their own. It makes no sense from security or resource perspectives to target people who eventually will be granted lawful status.

Not only is the call-in registration program ill-conceived, it also is being wrongly and ineffectively implemented and diverts law enforcement resources from initiatives that effectively enhance our security. The Department of Justice has not given the INS the necessary staff and resources to do its job and has not effectively disseminated information about the program. The paucity of information will make it likely that otherwise law-abiding people will not register or will fail to comply with program requirements and, therefore, be considered “per se” guilty of a criminal misdemeanor, deportable, and permanently barred from ever reentering the U.S.

Right now, it is only people from the designated countries that are targeted for this type of Special Registration. However, maybe next month, it will be another 10 countries and the month after another 10 countries. Eventually, the U.S. government might start having people who have relatives born in certain countries register. Eventually, the U.S. government might have U.S. Citizens register.

We must fight for civil liberties and constitutional due process for people here in the U.S. Of course no one wants there to be another terrorist attack. However, it is not real likely that a terrorist is going to go and Special Register. Therefore, the people whom are most likely to commit the terrorist acts are the very ones who will most likely not comply with the Special Registration requirements.

For many people in the U.S., this Special Registration is of no concern to them and they simply paint with a broad brush and state that we must prevent terrorism and that this is necessary. The critical concern is that it is the liberty and freedom of the United States that makes this country the best place on Earth to live. If that freedom and liberty is chipped away at, then the foundation of our country begins to erode.

We must do what is necessary to fight terrorism, but not impinge upon the duly protected constitutional rights of people. We must keep our civil rights and help those that are simply trying to make better lives for themselves. We must not target people and treat them unfairly simply because the color of their skin is different or there national origin is different. Otherwise, the terrorists have won.

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/u-s-citizen-discrimination-case/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/u-s-citizen-discrimination-case/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/employment-discrimination/

https://californiaimmigration.us/information-regarding-filing-complaints-of-discrimination-civil-rights-violations-and-racial-profiling-towards-immigrants

Filed under: best deportation attorney | Tagged: , , , , | Leave a comment »

Can I be deported?

Posted on February 1, 2026 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney

Question: I have been out of status for a number of years. Currently, I have a couple different petitions going forward. Once is a sibling based family petition, and the other is an employment based Labor Certification. I was told that it would take about another three to four years to be able to adjust my status to that of a Lawful Permanent Resident. There have been many news stories of people begin picked up by INS and deported, I am afraid for myself, my wife and my children. Can I just be deported?

Answer: Under most circumstances, the answer is no. Because you are here in the United States, you are allowed the opportunity to go in front of an Immigration Judge. Only if you had a previous deportation order can INS just take you and deport you without giving you a hearing. It is your constitutional right. Unlike many other countries around the world, even if you are not a citizen or a lawful permanent resident of the United States, you are entitled to due process. This means that you have an opportunity to present your case, to question witnesses, to cross examine witnesses who testify against you, to apply for relief or ways of staying permanently in the United States and to appeal decisions of the Immigration Judge that you are not satisfied with.

Question: What exactly might happen?

Answer: Each case is different. However, if you are targeted by INS, you should be served with what is known as a Notice to Appear. This is the beginning of the process. You might be taken into custody upon which you would be able to try to get a Bond Redetermination Hearing to get bonded out or become free while the immigration case is going forward. Then, over the next six months to two years, you will present your case in front of the Immigration Judge with the hope of winning.

Question: Am I entitled to an attorney?

Answer: Yes. You have every right to have an attorney represent you through these proceedings. However, unlike criminal cases, you must pay for the attorney to help you. The State will not provide one free of charge.

Question: How can the U.S. Constitution protect someone in my position?

 Answer: Because the U.S. Constitution gives people their rights as free persons in this country. If the U.S. Government were to just pick someone up and deport them, there would not be any safeguards against possible mistakes they may make. Also, the law allows people who are out of status to obtain their Green Cards based upon certain criteria. The government allows you to present that evidence. Just remember that this is the best country in the world to live in (no offense to those people elsewhere) and one reason it is such a great place to live is because individual rights are valued and treasured by our Constitution.

 However, the United States Government seems to be taking various rights away from certain immigrants. Therefore, you will have to make certain that you contact an immigration attorney right away in order to protect your rights and not be wrongfully deported.

Filed under: best deportation attorney | Tagged: , , , , | Leave a comment »

Can he be bonded out?

Posted on January 29, 2026 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney

Question: I have a friend that was taken into deportation and would like to know if he can be bonded out. Can you give me some guidance?

ANSWER: A wide range of INS officials have the power to arrest and detain people. The INS can arrest a person without a warrant if it has “reason to believe that the alien … is in the United States in violation of any [immigration] law or regulation and is likely to escape before a warrant can be obtained for his arrest.”

QUESTION: What happens after a person is arrested on a suspected immigration law violation?

ANSWER: S/he should be examined “without unnecessary delay” by an INS officer on his or her right to enter or remain in the United States. The officer examining the individual after arrest should not be the arresting officer unless another qualifying officer is not available and taking the person before another officer will cause unnecessary delay. If the examining officer finds prima facie evidence that the person arrested has violated the immigration laws, then the officer will place him or her in removal proceedings or institute expedited removal, if applicable.

If the INS places the person in removal proceedings, it should notify him or her of the reasons for his or her arrest. The examining officer should also inform the individual of his or her right to counsel at no expense to the government and provide him or her with a list of free legal service providers. The officer should also warn the person that any statement that s/he makes “may be used against him or her in a subsequent proceeding.”

The INS may hold a person arrested without a warrant for 48 hours or longer “in the event of emergency or other extraordinary circumstances.”12 On or before the conclusion of this period, the INS must determine whether the individual will continue to be detained or released on bond or recognizance. It must also decide whether to issue a Notice to Appear (NTA) and an arrest warrant.13

QUESTION: How does INS determine who should be released and under what conditions?

ANSWER: The local INS District Office (usually the Detention and Deportation Unit) makes the initial custody and bond determinations.14 As long as the s/he is not subject to mandatory detention due to criminal or terrorist grounds, the INS may release the individual on bond or on recognizance.15

In order to be released, a person “must demonstrate to the satisfaction of the officer that such release would not pose a danger to property or persons, and that the alien is likely to appear for any future proceeding.” The factors commonly considered in making the determination to release and/or set bond include: 1) Local family ties;
2) Prior arrests, convictions, appearances at hearings; 3) Membership in community organization; 4) Manner of entry length of time in the United States; 5) Immoral acts or participation in subversive activities; and 6) Financial ability to post bond.

After September 11, the government’s concern about security and intelligence gathering may also play a crucial role in deciding whether a person will be detained or released.

QUESTION: Can a person work once s/he has been released from INS custody?

ANSWER: The person can work as long as s/he is a lawful permanent resident (LPR) or is otherwise authorized to work, such as where s/he has received authorization to work based on a pending adjustment or asylum application.

QUESTION: Can a person challenge the INS’s custody/bond determination?

The regulations prohibit the following groups of people from requesting an Immigration Judge to review the INS’s custody and/or bond determination: 1) those considered to be “arriving aliens”; 2) those charged with being deportable on security, terrorism and related grounds; or 3) those subject to mandatory detention.

Even though an Immigration Judge does not have jurisdiction to redetermine custody and/or bond for the above groups, s/he does have jurisdiction to review whether the INS correctly determined that an individual does in fact belong to one of these groups.

Everyone else may request an Immigration Judge to review the INS’s custody and/or bond decisions at any time until a removal order becomes final. A request for custody and/or bond redetermination may be made orally, in writing, or by telephone, if the Immigration Judge permits in his or her discretion. If the person is detained, the request for custody and/or bond redetermination should be made to the Immigration Court that has jurisdiction over the place of detention. Otherwise, the request should be made to the Immigration Court that has administrative control over the case.

Bonded out

6 months bond

Bond hearing

Immigration bond 

Filed under: best deportation attorney | Tagged: , , , , | Leave a comment »

The new T Visa for victims of Severe Trafficking

Posted on January 22, 2026 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney

Question: I have a friend that has been in a most unfortunate circumstance. She was actually kidnapped from her home and sold into the underground world of sex slaves. Somehow, she escaped and fled to the U.S. She has no higher education or any job skills and no other family in the U.S. Is there anything she can do to stay here in the U.S.?

Answer: Yes, there is a new visa named the T Visa. To qualify, the person must be a victim of severe trafficking in persons. This can be a sex slave as you have mentioned, or it can be other forms of trafficking in persons such as slaves or involuntary servitude of any kind. The services provided must have been done under coercion or force.

Question: What must my friend do to avail herself of this T Visa?

Answer: First, she must be a victim of severe trafficking of persons. Next, she must be physically in the U.S. on account of such trafficking. If she is older than 15 years old, she must have tried to get the law enforcement officials in her home country to try to stop the acts. She must also show that if removed, she will suffer extreme hardship and harm. The application must be filed at the INS Service Center where she is present.

Question: My friend is too young to make it by herself, even if she gets the T Visa. Can her parents come and help and live with her?

Answer: Yes, the family members of a T Visa holder can get what is known as derivative status. This means that the parents and children (if they exist) can apply for the derivative T Visa. This is unique in visas. Normally, the parents do not derive any benefits from a visa obtained by their child. However, in this case, because of the nature of the visa, Congress has sought to allow parents to avail of this relief. The derivative applications must be sent along with the original application by the primary applicant.

Question: How long will my friend be able to stay on T status?

Answer: It can be issued for up to three years. There is no renewing this visa. However, after the three years, your friend can apply for Lawful Permanent Residency. Additionally, as long as the principal applicant (your friend) remains eligible, the family members also on T Visa can apply for Lawful Permanent Residency themselves.

Question: Assuming my friend gets the visa, is she guaranteed to get the Green Card?

Answer: Unfortunately, there is never a guarantee when it comes to immigration. However, in this case, there are specific provisions that allow INS to revoke or take away the visa status. The regulations do not specifically state how or why INS would revoke it, but assumably if the threat no longer exists, or they found out that it was obtained through fraud or misrepresentation, they could decide to revoke the visa. If this happens, they could be removed from the U.S. However, on the whole, this T Visa appears to benefit people who suffer extreme and outrageous conduct by other people. This is the United States stating to the world that anyone who is subjected to this cruelty will be welcome and allowed inside the U.S.

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/t-visa-2/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/t-visa-victim-of-severe-trafficking/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/visa-program/

Filed under: best deportation attorney | Tagged: , , , , | Leave a comment »

Immigration Article: How to come to the U.S. without a degree or experience

Posted on January 21, 2026 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney

Question: I have tried to come to the U.S. many times, but only to get refused by the U.S. embassy. I have been told that I do not qualify for an H-1B or Specialty Occupation Work Visa because I do not have a college degree. I have been told that I cannot get a Labor Certification for the Green Card because I have no experience and I have been told that I cannot work on a Student Visa. I really want to come to the United States, but do not know how. Can you suggest any options?

Answer: Yes, there is a visa known as the H-3 Visa. It is known as the trainee visa. What this means is that you can come to the United States in order to get training in a field that interest you.

Question: Are you allowed to work on this visa?

Answer: First, the visa is not primarily for working. However, as long as there is a program that you will be trained, then work can be done in order to supplement and understand the training. Thus, there will be a portion of each day that will be devoted to working. You can get paid for this work.

Question: What if the company does not have a training program?

Answer: It is not necessary that they already have a training program. However, if they already have one in existence, then it would go smoother. However, the training program can be established for the first time so that you can come to the U.S. to get the training with the necessary work support to understand the training.

Question: What types of positions will qualify for the H-3 Visa?

Answer: There is not any particular position. That is why this is such a nice visa. It can be computer related, managerial related, medical, operational, clerking, warehousing, and so on.

Question: How long does this visa last for?

Answer: Normally, it lasts for up to two years. But you want to keep something in mind. First, as long as you leave the U.S. prior to the actual two years has been completed, you can return to the U.S. at any time afterwards with a valid visa. However, if you actually stay the entire two years, you must stay outside of the U.S. for six months.

Question: Is there anyway to change your status to another visa after you would get the H-3?

Answer: Yes, you can change or adjust your status when you’re on the H-3. For example, part of your training might be to complete your degree. Once that happened, then you could change for H-3 to H-1B which is a working visa. You could also change it to a myriad of different other types of visas. This visa is a very nice one for people in your situation and all you need is a company willing to sponsor you for this visa with the intention to train you for some type of position. You should inquire into this visa so that you are not stuck outside the U.S.

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/immigrationattorney/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/american-immigration-attorney/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/immigrationlawyer/

Filed under: best deportation attorney | Tagged: , , , , | Leave a comment »

The Visa with Multiple Faces

Posted on January 20, 2026 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney

Question: I have tried to come to the United States on different types of visas, but have been denied at each turn. I cannot get a Visitor Visa and do not qualify for an H-1B work visa. I have also been denied the Student Visa. Do you have any suggestions?

Answer: The J Visa is very versatile. One can come in on the J Visa for many types of purposes. For example, the J Visa is available for students, professors and research scholars, short-term scholars, trainees, specialists, foreign medical graduates, international and government visitors, teachers, camp counselors and au pairs.

Question: Can you explain in some more detail what is involved with these categories?

Answer: For the students, a J is available for persons going to colleges that have been approved with a J Program. Students under certain conditions are allowed to work.

A trainee is one of the more popular uses of the J Visa. A trainee as an individual participating in a structured training program conducted by the selecting sponsor. The primary purpose of the trainee category is to enhance the exchange visitor’s skills in his or her specialty or non-specialty occupation through participation in a structured training program and to improve the participant’s knowledge of American techniques, methodologies, or expertise. The following areas are available for issuance of the J-1 Visa. Arts and culture; information media and communications; education, social sciences; library science, counseling and social services; management, business, commerce and finance; health-related occupations; aviation; the sciences, engineering, architecture, mathematics, and industrial occupations; construction and building trades; agriculture, forestry and fishing; public administration and law; and various other occupations as specified by the sponsor.

A J-1 specialist is defined as an individual who is an expert in a field of specialized knowledge or skill coming to the United States for observing, consulting, or demonstrating special skills. This category does not include professors, research scholars, short-term scholars, or foreign physicians in training programs. This type of J-1 can by used in lieu of the H-1B.

The au pair program permits foreign nationals to enter the United States for up to one year to live with a U.S. host family and participate directly in the home life of the family while providing limited child care services and attending a U.S. post-secondary educational institution.

Professors and research scholars may be sponsored as J-1 exchange visitors to engage in research, teaching, lecturing, observing, or consulting at research facilities, museums, libraries, post-secondary accredited educational institutions, or similar institutions.

Foreign medical graduates sponsored by accredited academic institutions with designated exchange visitor programs may come to the United States as exchange visitors for the purposes of observation, consultation, teaching, or research.

Teachers may be sponsored as exchange visitors to teach full-time at accredited primary or secondary educational institutions.

Secondary school students may come to the United States as J exchange visitors for up to one year to study at a U.S. public or private secondary school, while living with a U.S. host family or at an accredited U.S. boarding school.150 Participants must pursue a full course of study at an accredited educational institution for at least one and not more than two academic semesters.

A camp counselor is an individual selected to be a counselor in a summer camp in the United States who imparts skills to American campers and information about his or her country or culture. Participation in camp counselor exchange programs is limited to foreign nationals who are at least 18 years old and are bona fide youth workers, students, teachers, or individuals with special skills.

The summer/student travel work program is a program that authorizes foreign university students to travel and work in the United States during their summer vacations to involve the students directly in daily life in this country through temporary employment opportunities.

As you can see, the J Visa offers many options. While there may be a two-year foreign residency requirement, many times this type of visa offers the only hope for getting into the U.S.

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/a-visa/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/business-visa/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/change-of-status-to-student-visa/

Filed under: best deportation attorney | Tagged: , , , , | Leave a comment »

Immigration Article: What did we celebrate on July 4th?

Posted on January 19, 2026 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney

Question: I became a Lawful Permanent Resident several years ago, and am very grateful. However, there are several persons that I know that are not so lucky. They are still fighting to obtain legal residency in the U.S. Some are in deportation proceedings. Some are hiding in the shadows of America. Some are fearing everywhere they go. Are there any new leaders in Congress and should we give thanks of an elusive freedom that is so difficult to obtain?

 Answer: Recently, the President of the American Immigration Lawyers Association (AILA) wrote on this subject. I think it best to simply quote him. He states:

‘From the moment that terrorists attacked the United States last September, AILA has consistently supported measures legitimately required to guarantee our national security without eroding the fundamental rights guaranteed by the Constitution.

 AILA gratefully recognized President George W. Bush’s leadership when he reminded the nation that neither the Arabic community in the United States, nor the members of the Islamic faith throughout the world, are in any way responsible for the terrorist acts of criminals. And AILA called on leaders from both sides of the aisle to put the national interest above partisan considerations.

 Midterm Congressional elections are eminent, and the siren song of perceived political advantage has started to separate the opportunists from the statesmen. Events of the last few days have, as they say, given opportunism a bad name.

On June 20, the Dallas Morning Herald quoted Representative George Gekas, Chair of the House Subcommittee on Immigration, Border Security, and Claims (noting Census Bureau estimates that the undocumented population tops 8 million), as saying: “There are thousands among those millions, perhaps millions among those millions, who have exactly that kind of mind set . . . to become terrorists.”

Term limits resulted in Lamar Smith relinquishing the Immigration Subcommittee Chair in 2000. While never an immigration advocate, George Gekas, it was said, was no Lamar Smith. Could he possibly believe that there are millions of terrorists lurking among us? Had the Chair misspoken or had he unearthed an opportunist’s play book and thus signaled a sea change? Perhaps significantly, Mr. Gekas retained Smith’s subcommittee staff. And, to Mr. Gekas’s evident surprise, reapportionment has made his District more competitive, thus resulting in a serious challenge; he now must fight to win an 11th term.

Our answer came soon enough. On June 26, 2002, Mr. Gekas introduced the “Securing America’s Future through Enforcement Reform (SAFER) Act” (H.R. 5013).

SAFER is a cynical amalgam. It is over 200 pages long, but much of it can be categorized as: (1) piling on (in increasing penalties for offenses that may already be substantial); (2) redundant; and (3) grandstanding (taking credit for proposals that may eventually be enacted in other legislation). To be sure, SAFER contains some novel twists that are more than a little offensive and more than a little dangerous. (Mr. Gekas’s summary of SAFER was posted on the News Flash section of InfoNet and will remain available as Doc. No. 02062731; the text of the full bill will be posted as soon as it becomes available.) Legislatively, SAFER is irresponsible, but as its sponsors well know, it is also DOA. However, that is not the point. The point is that the political calculations were made and Representative Gekas cast his lot; he has bought FAIR’s agenda of Fear and Loathing wholesale.

 This week we celebrate our independence. The first July 4th after September 11, 2001 promises to be especially poignant. It is a particularly appropriate time to rejoice in America’s liberty and diversity and to remember the sacrifices of our people, who for four centuries, have come to these shores from every corner of the world to cultivate, nurture and defend our freedom and way of life. America is immigrants and the children of immigrants. This year a second day is just as important as July 4th to validate and affirm our nation’s freedom: our election day, Tuesday, November 5.

 I trust that on this July 4th we will hear and think a lot about fundamental American values. Between now and November 5 we must redouble our efforts to preserve these values. No one is better equipped to rebut anti-immigrant rhetoric than AILA attorneys. Don’t let mindless or hateful rhetoric go unchallenged. Write Opinion pieces and Letters to the Editor and be proactive in encouraging your clients to do the same. Go back to the basics–actively support candidates who have the courage to stand up for fundamental American values, immigrant rights and the rule of law. Encourage each of your eligible clients to naturalize, to register, and to vote. (A brochure, in both English and Spanish, with state-by-state voter registration information can be found on the InfoNet–go to “Advocacy Center,” then click on “Take Action” followed by “Vote Drive”). And oppose the politicians who have cynically chosen to use this moment of national crisis to undermine our heritage as a nation of immigrants, who would curtail the fundamental freedoms guaranteed by the Constitution. Write a check, support our friends and be sure that our foes pay the price. The tools you need are at your fingertips, through InfoNet.

The late North Carolina Congressman Richardson Preyer would began a campaign by telling the troops “It’s bumper sticker, door bell ringing time again.” So it is. Let us begin.’

Let us never take for granted the freedoms which we enjoy. There are people in our very backyard who will attempt to limit those freedoms and take them away from us.

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/deportation/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/deportation-attorney/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/deportation-proceedings/

https://californiaimmigration.us/removal/winning-a-deportation-proceeding-from-an-immigration-lawyer-and-deportation-attorney

Filed under: best deportation attorney | Tagged: , , , | Leave a comment »

HOMELAND SECURITY. WHAT DOES IT MEAN?

Posted on January 14, 2026 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney

Question: I have different petitions going through for my family. Other relatives are unfortunately in Removal/Deportation Proceedings. I understand that government is planning on restructuring certain departments. Will they restructure INS, and if so, what does that mean for us?

Answer: It appears as though either some or all of INS will be part of the new cabinet level division of the government. It will be known as Homeland Security. However, if it is done in a rash manner without giving the immigrants their rights, then it will hurt those immigrants trying to get her legally and to become legal in the future.

An effective, efficient, and fair immigration system is crucial to our national security and is fundamental to which we are as a people and as a nation of immigrants. Our immigration system must be reorganized. Our immigration system needs to be restructured on the basis of longstanding principles outlined by lawmakers, policy experts, and immigrant advocates.

These principles include: coordinating the separated enforcement and service functions, placing a strong leader in charge of both functions, and adequately funding enforcement and services.

If our immigration functions are included in the new Homeland Security Department, they must be reorganized within a separate division headed by a strong leader.

Question: What exactly will this new department do?

It is unclear at this time exactly what will happen and when it will happen. However, a new division, Immigration Services and Security, should be created within the Department of Homeland Security, headed by an Undersecretary who is knowledgeable about both services and enforcement. Immigration Services and Security should be made up of three sections: Immigration Services, Border Security, and Interior Security.

To enhance our security and support our border functions, a Transportation and Commercial Goods Security division also should be created. This division, along with the Immigration Services and Security division, would replace the proposed Border and Transportation Security Division.

The proposed Homeland Security Department must address concerns about civil rights, oversight, privacy, due process, and visa processing. The new agency must include an office to ensure that the constitutional and civil rights of all persons are protected as the agency carries out its national security mandates.

Policy development for visa issuance needs to remain a function of the State Department to avoid the chaos that would result from separating policy and process and to best address our foreign policy and U.S. business interests.

The Executive Office of Immigration Review (EOIR) must remain outside of the Department of Homeland Security, and be constituted as an independent agency in order to guarantee the impartiality and checks and balances of our justice system. Otherwise, it will be as though the Prosecutor is both the opposing attorney and the judge on the same case.

In order for any reform to be effective, Congress must take the time to get it right, overhaul our immigration laws, and protect both our nation and our values and traditions.

Creating a Department of Homeland Security is an enormous undertaking, and Congress must take the time to get it right. We cannot afford the mistakes and oversights of a hasty examination. There is too much at stake.

Department of homeland security

DHS meaning

Homeland security

Immigration reform and DHS

Filed under: best deportation attorney | Tagged: , , , , | Leave a comment »

A new way to beat Deportation

Posted on January 12, 2026 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney

Question: I have been here in the U.S. since I was six years old. About 12 years ago, I committed a drug crime of possession for sale. I was sentenced to 4 months. Now, all these years later, I have been put into removal proceedings where INS is trying to deport me. I have been told that I am an aggravated felon and there is nothing I can do. I have further been told that I will most likely be deported away from my family including my U.S. Citizen spouse and three U.S. Citizen Children. I have never done anything else criminally and it was just a stupid mistake when I was young. I have changed, have a good job, a family with U.S. Citizens and many community ties. Is there anything I can do?

Answer: As the law stands now, there is very little you can do. This is a result of the 1996 laws which increased dramatically the laws on what was considered to be an aggravated felony. It has torn families apart for many years since 1996. People who have become long term residents in the U.S. and have their Green Cards found out it did not make any difference. They were still deported. Furthermore, they found out that they were barred from coming back into the U.S. for the rest of their lives. Congress has seen all the suffering caused by the unfair and anti-immigration laws of 1996 and just this week the House Judiciary Committee passed the 2002 Due Process Reform Bill. While it still must be passed by the Senate and signed by the President, it is an excellent step in giving back some of the due process rights lost by long term residents who were put in deportation proceedings because of various crimes.

Question: How does this particular bill help me?

Answer: Please note that the Senate might change some of the provisions, or the President might require some alternate items in the bill. However, as the bill stands now, it applies specifically to people who previously had their Green Cards. They were or are going to be placed into deportation or removal proceedings because of a crime they committed. They are considered to be an aggravated felons and do not qualify for the normal Cancellation of Removal.

Question: What is Cancellation of Removal?

Answer: Prior to this bill there was a section of the bill referred to as Cancellation of Removal for Certain Lawful Permanent Residents. Generally, you had to have your Green Card for at least five-years and be physically present in the U.S. for at least seven-years. Finally, and this is the item that disqualified numerous people, is that you cannot be convicted of an aggravated felony.

Question: What does the new bill allow?

Answer: Basically it deals with the Cancellation of Removal for people who have committed aggravated felonies. In the new bill, it expands the Cancellation of Removal so that it allows people whom have been convicted of aggravated felonies to still keep their Green Cards and stay in the U.S. It deals with three different scenarios. First, people who have been convicted of a non violent aggravated felony. Second, people who were convicted of a violent aggravated felony. Finally, people who have been convicted of an aggravated felony and came to the U.S. as a young child. Each of these provisions allows a person to remain in the U.S. and to not be deported if the Judge grants the Cancellation of Removal. Therefore, this is a very big step toward restoring some of the harsh anti-immigrant provisions of the 1996 law. Hopefully, this trend will continue so that families can be reunited and the tearing apart of immigrant families will stop. .

Abstenia deportation

Best deportation lawyer

Deportation proceedings

How to win a deportation

Filed under: best deportation attorney | Tagged: , , , , | Leave a comment »

Title: Why am I penalized because my father became a U.S. Citizen?

Posted on January 11, 2026 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney

Question: I have seen your previous articles on the new Age-Out provisions of the law just recently passed. My father filed a petition for me around 1993. I am from the Philippines. He was a Lawful Permanent Resident at the time. Three years ago he became a U.S. Citizen. I was actually called for the interview at the U.S. embassy in the Philippines, but when they found out my father was a U.S. Citizen, they said my visa number was not current and made me leave. Can I still avail of this new law?

Answer: Yes. The President of the United States has just signed a bill referred to as the Child Status Protection Act. While a large part of the bill deals exclusively with persons who are going to ‘age-out’ or turn 21 years old, there is a very specific provision in the bill for people in your situation. It is specifically for persons who are the unmarried sons or daughters of a Lawful Permanent Resident parent. Once petitioned, the visa number availability falls under a certain preference category for Lawful Permanent Residents. That parent petitions them and at some later point naturalizes and becomes a U.S. Citizen. This now moves the petition into a different category where the wait for most of the rest of the world (other than the Philippines) is considerably shorter.

Question: What exactly does this bill do?

Answer: It gives you the right to write the Attorney General and tell him that you do not want the preference to automatically change. In other words, for people in your exact situation, you can make an election for the preference to stay exactly the same as if your mother was still a Lawful Permanent Resident

Question: What exactly does that do?

Answer: It means that you do not have to wait another 5 years to get your Green Card. Let’s pretend that your mother is still a Lawful Permanent Resident. If the priority date is current now, you can apply right now for Lawful Permanent Residency without waiting another 5 years. You will be able to be joined with your family years earlier.

Question: My friend is in the same situation, but she got into the U.S. and her kids did not. Can her children avail of this section?

Answer: Most probably not. Once there has either been a final Adjustment of Status or issuance of Lawful Permanent Residency, the law seems to indicate that derivative beneficiaries (i.e. the children) are no longer eligible. However, if it is still pending, then the law can be taken advantage of.

Question: It seems as though this law just came out. My mother filed the petition for me many years ago. Can I still take benefit of this new law?

Answer: The answer is yes. The law allows you to take advantage of this law if the petition for your family preference was filed, but a visa has not yet been issued, or you have not yet adjusted your status. Also, the petition for the family preference can be pending as of now either with the Department of State or the Department of Justice. It is a very nice law for people especially from the Philippines. Therefore, anyone who has been waiting years for this petition to become current, only to learn that they must wait many more years after becoming a U.S. Citizen, should take advantage of this law right away.

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/citizenship/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/citizenship-question/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/acquisition-of-u-s-citizenship/

https://californiaimmigration.us/citizenship/

Filed under: best deportation attorney | Tagged: , , , , | Leave a comment »

« Previous Page — Next Page »

  • Brian D. Lerner

    Immigration Lawyer

  • Blog Stats

    • 305,340 Visitors

  • Categories

  • Recent Posts