• Hours & Info

    (562) 495-0554
    M-F: 8:00am - 6:00 p.m.
    Sat: 9:00 a.m. - 12:00 p.m.
  • Past Blog Posts

  • https://api.whatsapp.com/send?phone=13104885414

State Department predictions for the F-2 visa category

State Department predictions for the F-2A visa category for FY2014, including the expectation that F-2A visas for Mexican nationals may retrogress in the spring of 2014. http://ow.ly/sx3NJ

F-2 visa meaning

F-2 visa process

Best Immigration Attorney

How an LPR can petition spouse right now as F-2 is current?

The BIA found the respondent eligible for asylum

The BIA found the respondent eligible for asylum, noting the compelling reasons respondent is unwilling to return to Senegal based on past female genital mutilation (FGM) irrespective of whether she has a well-founded fear of future persecution.

http://ow.ly/sx2MI

BIA, asylum and immigration

Asylum application

MTR 

Asylum cases

The Associated Press

The Associated Press reports that the nation’s already backlogged immigration courts might soon be thrown into more havoc as roughly half of their 220 judges will be eligible for retirement next year http://ow.ly/sx4mg

Immigration court

Immigration court proceedings

Immigration court practice manual

Deportation proceedings

What is a qualifying relative?

What is a qualifying relative?

Question: I have some friends who are applying for different kinds of waivers, but I don’t know if they qualify. I heard that they are supposed to have somebody that will suffer extreme hardship if they will be denied the waiver. Can you explain?

Answer: First, you have to understand what is a waiver. There are various grounds that somebody is inadmissible. These grounds include: Convicted of, or who admit to committing, either a crime involving moral turpitude (CIMT) or a violation of any law or regulation related to a controlled substance; Convicted of two or more offences with an aggregate period of confinement of five years or more; Who are controlled substance violators; Engaged in prostitution and/or commercialized vice within the past 10 years; Engaged in controlled substance trafficking; Engaged in human trafficking; Engaged in money laundering activities; Various Health related grounds; Misrepresentation and Fraud; Various Public Charge grounds; Security related grounds; Alien smuggling; Unlawful Presence or Engaged in money laundering activities;

However, sometimes, even though one is inadmissible, it is still possible that they can either adjust status or consulate process if they can apply for a ‘waiver’ of that ground of inadmissibility. This is when they can show sufficient hardship to a ‘qualifying relative’ if it is not approved. The issue then becomes who is a qualifying relative. It is not always the same for all waivers. In fact, it can very well be different persons, and therefore, it is critical that you know who can be a qualified relative and that such a person exists. Otherwise, you cannot do the waiver. It is also necessary to know the burden of hardship that must be shown to that qualifying relative.

Question: Can you give some examples?

Answer: Yes. Let’s start with health related grounds of inadmissibility. In these cases, if the foreign national is the spouse or unmarried child of a United States Citizen (USC) or Lawful Permanent Resident (LPR), or is the parent of a USC or LPR. There is no necessity in this case to show any hardship whatsoever.

Next, let’s discuss fraud and misrepresentation. This is a much harder waiver to get approved. Waivers of this ground of inadmissibility are available only if the foreign national is the spouse, son, or daughter of a USC or LPR. Note, that one cannot be the parent of a USC only to apply for this particular waiver. In this case, hardship to the qualifying relative must definitely be shown.

Question: How can we show hardship?

Answer: There are different ways, but in general, there are certain factors which should be in all the waivers whereby hardship must be shown. They are presence of USC/LPR family ties in the United States; The qualifying relative’s family ties outside the United States; Country conditions in the country of relocation and the qualifying relative’s ties to that country; Financial impact of departure; and Significant health conditions, particularly when tied to unavailability of suitable medical care in the country of relocation. Other relevant factors may include the impact of separation; economic and other conditions in the country of relocation; the financial, emotional, cultural, and political conditions in that country; and quality of life factors. According to the court, the waiver applicant must prove extreme hardship both if the qualifying relative stays in the United States and the applicant departs, and if the qualifying relative must accompany the applicant back to the country of relocation.

Question: What about criminal related grounds of inadmissibility?

Answer: Of course it will depend on the crime, but also, how long prior to the application for residency the crime was committed. For example, if the crime was committed more than 15 years before the date of the visa application, admission to the United States, or adjustment of status; The foreign national’s admission…

Qualifying relative

Qualifying relative meaning

Guidance on the approval of petitions and applications after the death of the qualifying relative

Inmediate relatives

The Supreme Court will hear oral arguments

The Supreme Court will heard oral argument on December 10, 2013, in the Child Status Protection Act (CSPA) case, Mayorkas v. De Osorio. The Court will consider whom Congress intended to benefit by INA §203(h)(3), a provision which allows beneficiaries of certain visa petitions to retain earlier priority dates after “aging-out” (turning 21) and losing child status. AILA and the American Immigration Council filed an amicus brief urging the Supreme Court to interpret the CSPA broadly. http://ow.ly/rBq5q

Supreme court of US

Supreme court and immigration

US supreme court

Tips to find the right Immigration Lawyer in LA

 

 

 

 

The Notice to Appear and Removal Proceedings

Deportation and the Notice to Appear

I’m in Deportation Proceedings. Now What?

Question: I have been served with a Notice to Appear and been put into Removal Proceedings. What do I do?

Answer: The Removal Proceedings begins with issuance of a Notice to Appear and there are very specific requirements that must be included in Notice to Appear. If they are not included, you can try to ask for proceedings to be terminated.

Question: What type of requirements are supposed to be in the Notice to Appear?

Answer: The following items are required: In removal proceedings under section 240, written notice (in this section referred to as a ‘notice to appear’) shall be given in person to the foreign national (or, if personal service is not practicable, through service by mail to the alien or to the alien’s counsel of record, if any). Thus, the first item is that it must be properly served on the foreign national in order to give notice of the hearing.

It must specify the following:
“(A) The nature of the proceedings against the alien.
“(B) The legal authority under which the proceedings are conducted.
“(C) The acts or conduct alleged to be in violation of law.
“(D) The charges against the alien and the statutory provisions alleged to have been violated.
“(E) The alien may be represented by counsel and the alien will be provided (i) a period of time to secure counsel
“(F)(i) The requirement that the alien must immediately provide (or have provided) the Attorney General with a written record of an address and telephone number (if any) at which the alien may be contacted. The requirement that the alien must provide the Attorney General immediately with a written record of any change of the alien’s address or telephone number and the consequencesof failure to provide address and telephone information.

Next, there must be the time and place at which the proceedings will be held and the consequences of the failure, except under exceptional circumstances, to appear at such proceedings.

There must be listed the time and place of the proceedings.

Question: Will an attorney be appointed for me?

Answer: No. However, you do have the ‘right’ to have an immigration attorney of your choosing. Therefore, the first hearing will usually be continued in order to give you an opportunity in which to obtain an immigration attorney to help you.

Question: Should I admit the crimes listed on the Notice to Appear?

Answer: You should never admit the crimes. It is the burden of the government to prove that you are removable by clear and convincing evidence and that burden cannot be shifted because you simply admit to the crime.

Question: What about the grounds of removability? Should I admit to those as well?

Answer: First, you should make certain that you have an immigration attorney who is familiar and an expert in deportation and removal proceedings. In any event, some items of removability you could not realistically deny. However, many you can deny. For example, if you are being charged as an aggravated felon, there is a possibility that you can fight this and show you are wrongfully being classified as an aggravated felon.

In any event, it is very important to plea properly to the Notice to Appear and to fight the issuance or contents of the Notice to Appear if they are not properly served or placed in the Notice to Appear.

Try Federal Habeas Corpus to Vacate a Conviction

Try to Vacate a Crime with a Federal Habeas Corpus

Expert Immigration Attorney

Business Immigration Attorney

Best Immigration Lawyer near me

The Law Offices of Brian D. Lerner

I have been deported outside the U.S. Now What?

I have been deported outside the U.S. Now What?

Question: About 3 years ago, I was deported outside the United States, and I feel it was not done properly and that I was improperly deported. What can I do?

Answer: There are several things that may be done, but a Habeas Corpus is available in certain circumstances. Habeas corpus review can be used to determine whether: (1) petitioner is an alien; (2) petitioner was ordered removed under such section; and (3) petitioner is an LPR, or was granted refugee or asylum status. In determining whether the person has been ordered removed, the court’s inquiry is limited to whether such an order was in fact issued and whether it relates to the petitioner.

Therefore, if you believe you were a lawful permanent resident, but it was wrongfully determined you were not, this option is available to you.

Question: What is I committed a crime and that is why they took away my residency? Can I used Habeas Corpus in that event? I tried to vacate the crime in State Court where I committed the crime, but it was denied.

Answer: There has been lots of case law, motions and documents filed to try to vacate or reduce the conviction so that you would either not be considered deportable or removal and/or so you would not be considered an aggravated felon. However, when the State Court remedies have failed, there is the option (depending on your jurisdiction) of doing a Federal Habeas Corpus in order to try to vacate a State Crime. AEDPA §§101-06 substantially reduced the ability to use 28 U.S.C. §§2254 and 2255 to attack State and Federal convictions. There is now a one-year statute of limitations for filing a habeas petition in federal court attacking a state conviction, §2244(d)(1), or federal conviction, §2255.

Thus, if your crime occurred many years ago, this option will not be available. Unfortunately, AEDPA also strengthened the presumption of correctness of the convictions and restricted successive petitions. However, petitions have been granted to vacate a conviction where the court would not have accepted the plea had it been aware of the immigration consequences.

Question: What if I applied after being released from custody? Will the Court have Jurisdiction?

Answer: Jurisdiction exists for habeas even where alien is released from incarceration. Certain states permit a vacatur of a plea only if filed within a limited time period. For example, Florida permits a party to vacate a plea only if it is filed within 2 years of the conviction.

Question: What is I am time barred from bringing this type of post-conviction relief?

Answer: Where a defendant is time-barred under state post-conviction procedures, he or she may be able to bring a Padilla claim under federal habeas. Ineffective assistance of counsel may be raised under certain circumstances in light of state procedural bars.

The defendant must allege and prove that she would not have entered into the plea if informed of the possibility of removal. Vacation of a plea will vacate the conviction for immigration purposes as long as it was not pursuant to a rehabilitative statute or because of immigration hardship. Unlike a vacatur of a conviction, a vacatur of a sentence may be done for any purpose, including immigration avoidance.

Question: What is I only needed a couple days less on my sentence not to be considered an aggravated felon?

Vacating a sentence is different than vacating a conviction. A party may vacate a sentence for any reason, including immigration avoidance, and it must be given full faith and credit by the Immigration Judges and the Board of Immigration Appeals. There is case law where a sentence was modified nunc pro tunc expressly to avoid deportation as an aggravated felon, IJ and BIA must recognize it.

Question: What about ineffective assistance of counsel?

Answer: If not properly raised previously and depending on your jurisdiction, you many be able to bring this claim under a Federal Habeas Corpus to challenge the State Conviction.

It will not be easy, but may be the difference between coming back to the U.S. versus never coming back.

Deported

Best deportation lawyer

Deportation notice

How to win a deportation

 

Committed a crime? Maybe you should not be deported due to retroactivity.

Crime

Immigration and crime

Crime meaning

Particulary serious crime