• Hours & Info

    (562) 495-0554
    M-F: 8:00am - 6:00 p.m.
    Sat: 9:00 a.m. - 12:00 p.m.
  • Past Blog Posts

  • https://api.whatsapp.com/send?phone=13104885414

The Washington Post report

http://ow.ly/sx70W The Washington Post reports that in response to an ACLU FOIA lawsuit, federal prosecutors in New York say they cannot meet a judge’s demands to quickly deliver documents about thousands of immigrants who have been detained nationwide for months or years as their immigration statuses are reviewed.

Appeal Foia

Foia meaning

Foia request

Our Immigration Law Firm

Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (AEDPA) and IIRIRA.

The BIA found that the Supreme Court precedent in Vartelas v. Holder allowed for the IJ to consider 212(c) relief since the respondent’s sole conviction pre-dated the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (AEDPA) and IIRIRA. http://ow.ly/sx6uJ

Terrorism

BIA 

Board of immigration appeals

BIA cases

Another recent immigration win. AOS and 212 (h)

Another recent immigration win. AOS and 212(h) case granted by IJ Tabaddor. DHS waived appeal. Represented client throughout removal process; from when she was detained by ICE and placed in proceedings until she was granted permanent residency. Client was initially charged with inadmissibilty but later with removability once we submitted proof of her lawful entry. Client married her USC husband while in proceedings and we prepared and filed the I-130 which was approved after an RFE. She had several theft convictions, the most recent in 2009 with a 16 month sentence. Client and her co-sponsor testified in support of her applications. Court determined that testimony of husband and children and other witness was not necessary. http://ow.ly/sEOaU

AOS meaning

Petitioner ineligible for AOS

USCIS inventory of employment based for presenting US birth certificare and continuos physical presence

Adjustment granted in court

 

 

 

 

The Latino Post reports

http://ow.ly/sx5dU The Latino Post reports that two new surveys reveal that Latino and Asian-Americans are more concerned about addressing the threat of deportation than creating a pathway to citizenship.

Acquisition of US citizenship

Derivative citizenship 

US citizenship

Citizenship application

▶ The B1 B2 Visitor Visa

▶ The B1 B2 Visitor Visa and how to have a better chance of success – YouTube http://ow.ly/sDiO9

What you need to prove to get the B-2 Visitor Visa.

Also, get some information on allowable activities.

State Department predictions for the F-2 visa category

State Department predictions for the F-2A visa category for FY2014, including the expectation that F-2A visas for Mexican nationals may retrogress in the spring of 2014. http://ow.ly/sx3NJ

F-2 visa meaning

F-2 visa process

Best Immigration Attorney

How an LPR can petition spouse right now as F-2 is current?

The BIA found the respondent eligible for asylum

The BIA found the respondent eligible for asylum, noting the compelling reasons respondent is unwilling to return to Senegal based on past female genital mutilation (FGM) irrespective of whether she has a well-founded fear of future persecution.

http://ow.ly/sx2MI

BIA, asylum and immigration

Asylum application

MTR 

Asylum cases

The Associated Press

The Associated Press reports that the nation’s already backlogged immigration courts might soon be thrown into more havoc as roughly half of their 220 judges will be eligible for retirement next year http://ow.ly/sx4mg

Immigration court

Immigration court proceedings

Immigration court practice manual

Deportation proceedings

What is a qualifying relative?

What is a qualifying relative?

Question: I have some friends who are applying for different kinds of waivers, but I don’t know if they qualify. I heard that they are supposed to have somebody that will suffer extreme hardship if they will be denied the waiver. Can you explain?

Answer: First, you have to understand what is a waiver. There are various grounds that somebody is inadmissible. These grounds include: Convicted of, or who admit to committing, either a crime involving moral turpitude (CIMT) or a violation of any law or regulation related to a controlled substance; Convicted of two or more offences with an aggregate period of confinement of five years or more; Who are controlled substance violators; Engaged in prostitution and/or commercialized vice within the past 10 years; Engaged in controlled substance trafficking; Engaged in human trafficking; Engaged in money laundering activities; Various Health related grounds; Misrepresentation and Fraud; Various Public Charge grounds; Security related grounds; Alien smuggling; Unlawful Presence or Engaged in money laundering activities;

However, sometimes, even though one is inadmissible, it is still possible that they can either adjust status or consulate process if they can apply for a ‘waiver’ of that ground of inadmissibility. This is when they can show sufficient hardship to a ‘qualifying relative’ if it is not approved. The issue then becomes who is a qualifying relative. It is not always the same for all waivers. In fact, it can very well be different persons, and therefore, it is critical that you know who can be a qualified relative and that such a person exists. Otherwise, you cannot do the waiver. It is also necessary to know the burden of hardship that must be shown to that qualifying relative.

Question: Can you give some examples?

Answer: Yes. Let’s start with health related grounds of inadmissibility. In these cases, if the foreign national is the spouse or unmarried child of a United States Citizen (USC) or Lawful Permanent Resident (LPR), or is the parent of a USC or LPR. There is no necessity in this case to show any hardship whatsoever.

Next, let’s discuss fraud and misrepresentation. This is a much harder waiver to get approved. Waivers of this ground of inadmissibility are available only if the foreign national is the spouse, son, or daughter of a USC or LPR. Note, that one cannot be the parent of a USC only to apply for this particular waiver. In this case, hardship to the qualifying relative must definitely be shown.

Question: How can we show hardship?

Answer: There are different ways, but in general, there are certain factors which should be in all the waivers whereby hardship must be shown. They are presence of USC/LPR family ties in the United States; The qualifying relative’s family ties outside the United States; Country conditions in the country of relocation and the qualifying relative’s ties to that country; Financial impact of departure; and Significant health conditions, particularly when tied to unavailability of suitable medical care in the country of relocation. Other relevant factors may include the impact of separation; economic and other conditions in the country of relocation; the financial, emotional, cultural, and political conditions in that country; and quality of life factors. According to the court, the waiver applicant must prove extreme hardship both if the qualifying relative stays in the United States and the applicant departs, and if the qualifying relative must accompany the applicant back to the country of relocation.

Question: What about criminal related grounds of inadmissibility?

Answer: Of course it will depend on the crime, but also, how long prior to the application for residency the crime was committed. For example, if the crime was committed more than 15 years before the date of the visa application, admission to the United States, or adjustment of status; The foreign national’s admission…

Qualifying relative

Qualifying relative meaning

Guidance on the approval of petitions and applications after the death of the qualifying relative

Inmediate relatives

The Supreme Court will hear oral arguments

The Supreme Court will heard oral argument on December 10, 2013, in the Child Status Protection Act (CSPA) case, Mayorkas v. De Osorio. The Court will consider whom Congress intended to benefit by INA §203(h)(3), a provision which allows beneficiaries of certain visa petitions to retain earlier priority dates after “aging-out” (turning 21) and losing child status. AILA and the American Immigration Council filed an amicus brief urging the Supreme Court to interpret the CSPA broadly. http://ow.ly/rBq5q

Supreme court of US

Supreme court and immigration

US supreme court

Tips to find the right Immigration Lawyer in LA