• Hours & Info

    3233 E. Broadway,
    Long Beach, CA 90803
    (562) 495-0554
    M-F: 8:00am - 6:00 p.m.
    Sat: 9:00 a.m. - 12:00 p.m.

  • Past Blog Posts

  • https://api.whatsapp.com/send?phone=13104885414

Removal Proceedings – What is it?

Posted on June 3, 2025 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney

Question: I am now in removal proceedings. I also have many friends who are in the same type of removal proceedings. However, all of us have different situations. Under what basis can we be put into removal proceedings?

Answer: The Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR), an agency of the Department of Justice, oversees three components which adjudicate matters involving immigration law matters at both the trial and appellate level. Under the Office of the Chief Immigration Judge, more than 200 Immigration Judges located in 53 Immigration Courts nationwide conduct proceedings and decide individual cases. The agency includes the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA), which hears appeals of Immigration Judge decisions, and the Office of the Chief Administrative Hearing Officer, which handles employment-related immigration matters.

Immigration Judges conduct removal proceedings, which account for approximately 80 percent of their caseload. Removal hearings are conducted to determine whether certain aliens are subject to removal from the country. Beginning April 1, 1997, the distinction between exclusion and deportation proceedings was eliminated, and aliens subject to removal from the United States were all placed in removal proceedings. Thus, the removal proceeding is now generally the sole procedure for determining whether an alien is inadmissible, deportable, or eligible for relief from removal. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is responsible for commencing a removal proceeding.

Removal proceedings generally require an Immigration Judge to make two findings: (1) a determination of the alien’s removability from the United States, and (2) thereafter deciding whether the alien is eligible for a form of relief from removal.

Usually at the beginning, an Immigration Judge conducts a bond redetermination hearing for aliens who are in DHS detention. The person in proceedings makes a request to the Immigration Judge to lower or eliminate the amount of the bond set by the DHS. These hearings are generally informal and are not a part of the removal proceedings. This decision can be appealed by either the alien or by DHS to the BIA.

Question: One of my friends actually already has their Green Card. Why would he be in removal proceedings?

Answer: An Immigration Judge can conducts a rescission hearing to determine whether a lawful permanent resident (LPR) should have his or her residency status rescinded because he or she was not entitled to it when it was granted. Additionally, it is possible for someone who is an LPR to commit a crime making them ineligible to keep their Green Card.

Question: What about someone who fears going back to their home country?

Answer: An asylum-only hearing will be used to determine whether certain aliens who are not entitled to a removal hearing but claim a well-founded fear of persecution in their home country are eligible for asylum. In normal circumstances, asylum claims are heard by Immigration Judges during the course of a removal hearing.

Thus, there are many different types of hearings that can be conducted. There is many times relief from removal proceedings, so you need to fight hard during the proceedings and do not let anyone walk over your rights.

Filed under: best deportation attorney | Tagged: , , , , | Leave a comment »

My child is a U.S. Citizen – and I didn’t even know!

Posted on June 2, 2025 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney

Question: We just petitioned our child after not seeing him in our home country for over 2 years. He will be coming to the U.S. as a Lawful Permanent Resident. When can we apply for citizenship for him?

Answer: On October 30, 2000, the Child Citizenship Act of 2000 (CCA) was signed into law. The new law permitted foreign-born children (including adopted children) to acquire citizenship automatically if they meet certain requirements. It became effective on February 27, 2001.

Question: Which Children Automatically Become Citizens Under the CCA?

Answer: Since February 27, 2001, certain foreign-born children of U.S. citizens (including adopted children) residing permanently in the United States acquired citizenship automatically. The term “child” is defined differently under immigration law for purposes of naturalization than for other immigration purposes, including adoption. To be eligible, a child must meet the definition of “child” for naturalization purposes under immigration law, and must also meet the following requirements: The child has at least one United States citizen parent (by birth or naturalization); The child is under 18 years of age; The child is currently residing permanently in the United States in the legal and physical custody of the United States citizen parent; The child has been admitted to the United States as a lawful permanent resident or has been adjusted to this status; An adopted child must also meet the requirements applicable to the particular provision under which they qualified for admission as an adopted child under immigration law. Acquiring citizenship automatically means citizenship is acquired by operation of law, without the need to apply for citizenship.

Question: Must an application be filed with USCIS to establish a child’s citizenship?

Answer: No. If a child qualifies for citizenship under the Child Citizenship Act, the child’s citizenship status is no longer dependent on USCIS approving a naturalization application. The child’s parents may, however, file an application for a certificate of citizenship on the child’s behalf to obtain evidence of citizenship. If a child satisfies the requirements listed above, he or she automatically acquires U.S. citizenship by operation of law either on the day of admission to the United States or on the day that the last condition for acquiring citizenship is satisfied.

Question: Will Eligible Children Automatically Receive Proof of Citizenship?

Answer: If the child falls under this provision, they will automatically receive a Certificate of Citizenship within 45 days of admission into the U.S. This program eliminates the need for the issuance of a Permanent Resident Card for newly entering children, since these cards are not applicable to U.S. citizens.

In other words, if the child falls under this provision of law, the moment they are admitted as a Lawful Permanent Resident, they are immediately considered to be a U.S. Citizen.

Filed under: best deportation attorney | Tagged: , , , , | Leave a comment »

PERM: 245(i): Am I or am I not under it?

Posted on May 29, 2025 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney

Question: I have heard a great deal of 245(i) and how people who are here illegally can still adjust status in order to obtain Lawful Permanent Residency. I can’t figure out who is under 245(i) and who is not. Can you explain?

Answer: In general, 245(i) allows someone who filed either a Labor Certification or a family based petition prior to April 30, 2001. They would pay $1,000 fine and then they can apply for adjustment of status.

Question: What if my sister applied for me and it will take another 12 years for the visa number to become current? Can I fall under 245(i) with another application?

Answer: Yes, 245(i) is ‘grandfathered’ and can be transferred to another quicker application (like PERM) and still be eligible under 245(i).

Question: What if the adjustment application is denied? Can I file another application and still be under 245(i)?

Answer: Yes. Regardless of how many applications you have, you can keep paying the $1,000 penalty fee along with the normal application fees until an adjustment application is approved.

Question: How about dependants of the person who qualifies for adjustment of status? Who exactly qualifies?

Answer: If the relationship existed at the time the application was filed, the spouse and children are grandfathered. This means that even if there is a divorce or the child becomes older than 21 years of age, they are still grandfathered.

However, if the relationship with the principal did not exist until after April 30, 2001, then the dependants do not independently qualify under 245(i), but rather, must apply with the principal alien. In other words, they are under 245(i) as long as the relationship still exists with the principal person.

If the principal person applied for adjustment of status and then gets married or has another dependant, that person cannot then apply for adjustment of status under 245(i).

Thus, whether you are grandfathered under 245(i) is of critical importance as to whether you can eventually apply for lawful permanent residency. Therefore, you need to be very careful in determining whether you qualify under the above referenced rules.

Filed under: best deportation attorney | Tagged: , , , , | Leave a comment »

PERM: More on Terrorism.

Posted on May 28, 2025 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney

Question: I have heard a great deal of new regulations and rules regarding anti-terrorism efforts. Have there been any new provisions recently that have been added?

Answer: Yes. If you are in Immigration Court and have submitted several different types of applications, there is a new procedure being implemented which is another layer of security checks.

Question: Which applications are applicable?

Answer: The applications are divided into two areas. First, if you apply for Asylum and Withholding of Removal. Secondly would be if you are applying for Adjustment of Status, Cancellation of Removal for Lawful Permanent Residents, Cancellation of Removal for Non Permanent Residents, Suspension of Deportation or Special NACARA Suspension of Deportation.

Question: If you are applying for the first category of Asylum and Withholding of Removal, what must you now do?

Answer: You must send certain documents now to the USCIS Nebraska Service Center. It should be entitled ‘Defensive Asylum Application with Immigration Court.’ You need to send a clear copy of the first three pages of your completed Form I-589 (Application for Asylum and for Withholding of Removal) that you will be filing or have filed with the Immigration Court, which must include your full name, your current mailing address, and your alien number (A number). Do Not submit any documents other than the first three pages of the completed I-589) and (2) A copy of Form EOIR–28 (Notice of Entry of Appearance as Attorney or Representative before the Immigration Court) if you are represented by an attorney.

Question: What will happen after these documents are sent in?

Answer: A USCIS receipt notice in the mail indicating that USCIS has received your asylum application, and an Application Support Center (ASC) notice for you and each dependent included in your application. Each ASC noticewill indicate the individual’s unique receipt number and will provide instructions for each person to appear for an appointment at a nearby ASC for collection of biometrics (such as your photograph, fingerprints, and signature). You should receive the notice within three weeks after submitting the documents to the USCIS in Nebraska. You (and your dependents) must then attend the biometrics appointment at the ASC, and obtain a biometrics confirmation document before leaving the ASC, and retain your ASC biometrics confirmation as proof that your biometrics were taken, and bring it to your future Immigration Court hearings.

Question: What is the procedure for the other applications you stated will be filed in Immigration Court?

Answer: A clear copy of the entire application form that you will be filing or have filed with the Immigration Court. (Do not submit any documents other than the completed form itself); (2) the appropriate application fee; (3) the $70 USCIS biometrics fee and (4) A copy of Form EOIR–28 (Notice of Entry of Appearance as Attorney or Representative before the Immigration Court) if you are represented. You should send it to the USCIS Texas Service Center.

Question: After you send these documents to Texas, will the same procedure be followed as with the Asylum application.

Answer: Most of it is exactly the same. However, with these applications, after you receive your biometrics appointment and get your fingerprints taken, you must file the following with the Immigration Court within the time period directed by the Immigration Judge: (1) the original application Form, (2) all supporting documentation, and (3) the USCIS notice that instructs you to appear for an appointment at the ASC.

Hopefully, this new procedure will not delay proceedings and will move efficiently through the process.

Filed under: best deportation attorney | Tagged: , , , , | Leave a comment »

Why am I penalized because my father became a U.S. Citizen?

Posted on May 27, 2025 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney

Question: I have been waiting many years to become a Lawful Permanent Resident. My father petitioned me many years ago. My priority date was almost current, and then my father became a U.S. Citizen. Afterwards, I actually had to wait many more years. He only became a U.S. Citizen because he thought it would speed up the process. Is there anything I can do?

Answer: Actually, the Child Status Protection Act (CSPA) had a provision that addressed your exact concern. On August 6, 2002, the President signed into law the Child Status Protection Act (CSPA), Public Law 107-208, 116 Stat. 927. Section 6 of the CSPA allows for unmarried sons or daughters of lawful permanent residents (LPRs) to remain classified as second preference aliens, even if the LPR parent naturalizes. In other words, this provision actually applies only to people from the Philippines at this point as in the rest of the world the priority date is years closer when the parent petitioner becomes a U.S. Citizen.

Section 6 of the CSPA provides for the automatic transfer of preference categories when the parent of an unmarried son or daughter naturalizes, but also provides the unmarried son or daughter the ability to request that such transfer not occur. There are certain instances when the visa availability dates are more current for the unmarried sons or daughters of LPRs than for the unmarried sons or daughters of United States citizens. In such instances, it would be to the advantage of the alien beneficiary to request that the automatic conversion to the first preference category not occur because a visa would become available sooner if the alien remained in the second preference category than if he converted to the first preference category. As of this date, the Department of State Visa Bulletin shows that visa availability in the first preference category is more current than for the second preference categories, except for beneficiaries from the Philippines. As such, it is anticipated that only beneficiaries from the Philippines will seek to take advantage of the CSPA.

Question: I heard about the CSPA and was told to write a letter that I wanted to go back to the 2nd preference, not to stay at the 1st preference which I automatically was move to at the time my father had petitioned me. I did not know who to write the letter to, but sent off such a letter requesting to be changed to 2nd preference. However, to date nothing has changed.

Answer: I agree that this has been a problem. In the past, we would write Immigration and they would tell us to write the National Visa Center. Then, we would write the National Visa Center and they would tell us to write Immigration. It was a game of finger pointing without any resolution. However, guidance from Immigration has just come out.

All beneficiaries in the Philippines wishing to opt out of the automatic conversion must file a request, in writing, addressed to the Officer in Charge, Manila. The Officer in Charge shall provide written notification, on official U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services letterhead, of a decision on the beneficiary’s request to the beneficiary and to the Department of State’s visa issuance unit. If the beneficiary’s request is approved, then the beneficiary’s eligibility for family-based immigration will be determined as if his or her parent had never naturalized and they will remain a second preference alien.

Filed under: best deportation attorney | Tagged: , , , , | Leave a comment »

PERM: I can get my Green Card much faster!

Posted on May 20, 2025 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney

 Question: I have heard a great deal about the new PERM program. Specifically, that it will take only 60 days or less to rule on the PERM application once it is submitted to the Department of Labor. Does this mean that I can immediately apply for a Green Card after receiving an approved Labor Certification?

Answer: The answer would be yes and no depending on your particular case. The normal procedure for a typical Labor Certification (which is what the new PERM is) would be for the employer to file what is known as the I-140 or employer petition once the Labor Certification is certified or approved. This petition is filed to the USCIS and basically would prove that the person is qualified for the position. If the visa number is available at the time the I-140 petition is filed, then the Adjustment of Status application could be filed at the same time as the I-140. In these types of cases, both subsequent applications to the labor certification could be filed at the same time and things would move very quickly. Of course, this also assumes that you are qualified to adjust your status in the United States to that of Lawful Permanent Residency.

However, in the last month, the EB-3 category for some countries has been backlogged and now has a significant wait before the visa number will become current. There are several categories that people fall under when applying for the Green Card. If the position requires less than two years experience, then it is considered unskilled labor. If the position requires more than two years experience, but does not require a college degree of at least a bachelor, then it is considered skilled labor. If the position requires a bachelor degree, but no type of higher degree, then it is considered a professional position. Thus, unskilled labor, skilled labor and professional positions all fall under the EB-3 category. If the visa number is backlogged, then you must await until the visa number becomes current in order to apply to adjust your status to that of a Lawful Permanent Resident.

Question: Which countries have backlogged EB-3 categories and how long do they have to wait?

Answer: There are three countries that are backlogged. They are China, India and the Philippines. If you happen to be from one of those countries, you must wait until the visa number becomes current in order to process the adjustment application after the visa number becomes current. At the present time, the current processing date is January 2002. Therefore, only if the priority date on the Labor Certification that you filed is on or before January 2002 will you actually be able to file the adjustment application at the present time. It does appear (although this could certainly change) that the wait for people in the EB-3 category would have to wait approximately 3 years for the visa number to be current for any new PERM application that is filed. Of course, it could be more or less depending on how fast the visa numbers are processed.

Question: What if I am from one of those countries, but my job requires a Masters or Doctorate degree?

Answer: In that case, you would not be in the EB-3 category, but rather, you would be in the EB-2 category for positions that require advanced degrees. If this were the case, there is no backlog and you would be able to file the adjustment application right away after the Labor Certification is approved.

Filed under: best deportation attorney | Tagged: , , , , | Leave a comment »

H-1B’s and a Holiday Greeting!

Posted on May 14, 2025 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney

Question: I have heard that there are some new H-1B laws that have come out. Can you discuss what these changes are?

Answer: Changes in Certain USCIS Fees as a result of the approval of the FY05 Omnibus Appropriations Act The H-1B and L non-immigrant provisions of the Omnibus appropriations Act reinstate the American Competitiveness and Workforce Improvement Act (ACWIA) fees first put in place after the approval of the ACWIA in 1998. The requirements under the original ACWIA sunset on October 1, 2003. This was where the employer had to pay $1,000 fee for every H-1B petition filed.

For H-1B petitioners, the new fee for petitioners who employ 25 or more Full Time Equivalent employees is $1,500. Petitioners who employ no more than 25 Full Time Equivalent employees (including any affiliate or subsidiary) may submit a reduced fee of $750. The new $1,500 and $750 fees apply to any non-exempt petitions filed with USCIS after December 8, 2004. Certain types of petitions that were previously exempt from the fees remain exempt from the new $1,500 and $750 fees.

Question: I heard there was some type of fraud fee as well. Is that true?

Answer: Yes. The Act creates a new Fraud Prevention and Detection Fee of $500 which must be paid by petitioners seeking a beneficiary’s initial grant of H-1B or L nonimmigrant classification or those petitioners seeking to change a beneficiary’s employer within those classifications. The only petitions exempt from paying this fee are those that seek to amend or extend the stay of the beneficiary. This new $500 fee applies to petitions filed with the USCIS on or after March 8, 2005.

Each of these fees is in addition to the base processing fee of $185 to file a Petition for a Nonimmigrant Worker (Form I-129) and any premium processing fees, if applicable.

Question: Are there any more H-1B’s available?

Answer: Yes. For persons with a Masters degree or higher, there is now an additional 20,000 H-1B visas.

I would personally like to extend my wishes to all the readers and their families for a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year and a Happy Holiday Season.

As an immigration attorney, I do see families of immigrants being torn apart because of unfair and ruthless immigration laws. I will continue to fight for all of the immigrants and their families so that they can be reunited and together once more.

Filed under: best deportation attorney | Tagged: , , , , | Leave a comment »

I thought H-1B’s were dead!

Posted on May 12, 2025 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney

Question: I have heard that H-1B’s were all used up for this fiscal year on the very first day. I have my Masters in Business Administration and was hoping to get an H-1B. Is there anything I can do?

Answer: Actually, there have been new H-1B provisions which have been passed by both the House and the Senate. It is simply awaiting signature by the President of the United States to make it law. It was actually passed inside of an Omnibus Budget Bill.

The new H-1B laws are entitled the ‘H-1B Visa Reform Act of 2004’. Now an employer must pay $1,500 to have an H-1B petition filed. If the employer has less than 25 employees, then the employer will only be required to pay $750.00. Additionally, there is a ‘Fraud Fee’ for both H’s and L’s of $500. Apparently, there is a big concern about fraudulently filed H’s and L’s and now everybody who files such applications must pay $500 which will go to a specific unit to investigate such fraud.

Next, the prevailing wage to be paid must be 100% (not 95%) of what is normal for the industry. However, the law now mandates that instead of the currently listed two tier wage for experience, there should be a four tier level of experience to determine the wage.

The Department of Labor will be able to conduct and initiate investigations into what it believes are employers violating the H-1B provisions.

In regards to your situation, now people who earn Master’s or higher degree from a U.S. institution are now exempt from the H-1B cap. There is a limitation of 20,000 per year for this exemption. Thus, assuming this is signed into law, it would help you for the next fiscal year. This is certainly a step in the right direction.

Question: There are certainly a lot of fees that have been added. Where are all of those fees going to go?

Answer: The distribution of money will be as follows: Job training- from 55% to 50%; Scholarship program- from 22% to 30%; National Science Foundation grant program for K-12 Math. Science and Technology education- from 15% to 10%; DHS processing from 4% to 5% and DOL processing maintained at 5%. The scholarships for computer science or other technology or science programs are increased from $3,125 to $10,000.

The most important provisions changing the H-1B program seem to be the exemption of persons with Master’s and higher education in the U.S. This will actually free up 20,000 more H-1B’s per year for everyone else. While this is not nearly enough, it is certainly a good start.

Filed under: best deportation attorney | Tagged: , , , , | Leave a comment »

If I stay, I will be killed

Posted on May 7, 2025 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney

Question: I live in a country that is very dangerous. It is not democratic and I decided to protest against the government in order to try to make some democratic changes. I was in a protest rally. Unfortunately, the government sent its soldiers out and killed many people. I escaped. However, the government suspects that I was in the protest rally (as well as distributing e-mails and other pro-democracy pamphlets.) I am now afraid for my life. I went to the United States Consulate in my home country and got a visa to the United States I basically lied and said I just wanted to visit the United States I was desperate to get out of the country. Now I am in the United States Is there anything I can do?

Answer: You can certainly apply for asylum in the United States Asylum provides a haven in the United States for certain persecuted people of the world. The Attorney General may grant asylum to aliens present in the United States who have been the subject of persecution in their home country. Because of the broad rights granted to asylees, and concern that many people who apply for asylum do not actually qualify for it, all asylum applicants must meet stringent substantive and procedural requirements.

Question: How can I qualify for asylum?

Answer: To establish eligibility for asylum, you must show that you are a refugee. The term ‘refugee’ means any person who is outside any country of such person’s nationality or, in the case of a person having no nationality, is outside any country in which such person last habitually resided, and who is unable or unwilling to return to, and is unable or unwilling to avail himself or herself of the protection of that country because of persecution or a well-founded fear of persecution on account of race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group, or political opinion.

Therefore, asylum is not just for those who apply for ‘political’ asylum. The United States opens the doors to persons whom are subjected to religious, nationality and other categories of persecution.

Question: I have not actually been persecuted in the past. I am just deathly afraid to go back because of what will happen to me. Is this a problem?

Answer: No. If you can show that you have a well founded fear of future persecution, then it is not necessary to show past persecution. If on the other hand, you were able to show past persecution, then it is presumed you will suffer future persecution. Thus, you have more of a hurdle to get over, but if you will be persecuted upon your return to your home country, you are certainly eligible to apply for asylum.

Question: If I am granted asylum, can my wife and children come to the United States with me and will I be able to work?

Answer: After an alien is granted asylum, he or she is called an asylee. His or her spouse and children may be granted permission to reside in the United States. An asylee will receive appropriate authorization to enable him or her to work in the United States. Finally, because asylum is a temporary status, the asylee can apply for other, more permanent, types of status in the United States.

Filed under: best deportation attorney | Tagged: , , , , | Leave a comment »

Door is Closed for Professionals

Posted on May 6, 2025 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney

Question: I came here on a visitor visa 3 months ago and now I would like to apply for the H-1B. What must I do?

Answer: Unfortunately, you are too late for this years allotment. As of October 1, 2004, all H-1B’s have been allotted for the next fiscal year until October 1, 2005. Thus, as unfair as it seems, the day the new year’s allotment was opened, it was shut off and closed.

The H-1B Cap prohibits U.S. Employers from hiring global talent On October 1, 2004. USCIS officials announced that the H-1B cap on visas for highly educated foreign professionals had been reached. Unless Congress takes action before the end of the 108th session, employers will be barred from hiring new H-1B foreign professionals for an entire year. Essential action would include exempting from the H-1B numerical cap graduates from U.S. universities who have earned a Master’s degree or higher. Such a rational solution to this crisis would help ensure a workable H-1B program that would give U.S. employers access to the talent they need and help retain jobs in America. A select number of H-1B professionals are graduates from U.S. top universities’ Master’s and PhD programs. In the graduate-level math and sciences programs, foreign nationals represent roughly half of all graduates. Prohibiting access to these world-class minds raises troubling issues. Not only would U.S. employers miss out on American-educated talent, but we would be handing this talent to our competitors abroad. Indeed, foreign countries are updating their immigration policies to attract this highly educated talent, making the competition to retain the best and the brightest that much more difficult for the United States to win. The exhaustion of this fiscal year’s visa numbers also has made it more difficult for Americans to receive needed services. For instance, it is not commonly known that H-1B professionals serve as doctors, teachers and researchers, and work to develop products and services that improve the lives of Americans. H-1B professionals include psychologists and special education instructors who work with the mentally challenged, engineers who design tunnels and subway corridors that can withstand terrorist attacks, and biomedical researchers central to the fight against cancer, AIDS and other diseases. Without access to these highly educated foreign professionals, America will suffer. Not only will our ability to provide benefits to our own citizens be diminished, but the glow of American innovation that results from having access from the world’s brightest minds may be forever dimmed.

Question: Are there any other options?

Answer: There are other types of nonimmigrant visas such as the O, E, L, and other H’s. You should definitely look into those other options and not go out of status.

Filed under: best deportation attorney | Tagged: , , , , | Leave a comment »

« Previous Page — Next Page »

  • Brian D. Lerner

    Immigration Lawyer

  • Blog Stats

    • 305,739 Visitors

  • Categories

  • Recent Posts