• Hours & Info

    (562) 495-0554
    M-F: 8:00am - 6:00 p.m.
    Sat: 9:00 a.m. - 12:00 p.m.
  • Past Blog Posts

  • https://api.whatsapp.com/send?phone=13104885414

Mexican immigration will undergo changes by June 2010

In an effort to regulate and establish more uniform guidelines changes have been made to Mexico’s immigration procedure. The government has on 01/29/10, Mexico’s National Migration Institute published its Manual of Criteria and Migration Procedures. The Manual will be enforced as of 5/1/10 throughout the 32 delegations of the National Migration Institute in Mexico.

Mexican Immigration

Are you a Mexican citizen?

Immigration Lawyer near me

How can I petition a helper from Mexico?

Filing H-1B may face tougher guidelines

New guidelines are issued for the H-1B regarding more substantial proof of employee and employer relationship existence. USCIS invites national stakeholders to a teleconference on 2/18/10 to discuss the implementation of the memo issued on 1/8/10 which provides guidance on determining if a valid employer-employee relationship exists. In light of recent fraud cases appearing at major immigration firms constituted some way of determining valid employment of applicant of the   H-1B.

H-1B Attorney

Amended H-1B petition

H-1B process

H-1B Cap: Questions and answers

US Economic Policy on H-1B and L-1 Visa

Are US companies taking advantage of cheap labor in H-1B Visa applicants? This is the question some government officials are asking. The Economic Policy Institute released a briefing paper titled “Bridge to Immigration or Cheap Temporary Labor? The H-1B & L-1 Visa Programs Are a Source of Both.”

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/h-1b/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/l1b/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/l1-intracompany-transferee-petition/

https://californiaimmigration.us/h-1bs-cap-reached/

Can they deport me again?

Question: I was deported years ago and could not stay away from my wife any longer. I reentered the U.S. illegally and am now reunited with my wife. Can they deport me again?

Answer: Removal pursuant to §241(a)(5) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) – the reinstatement of removal provision – accounts for 40% of all removals nationwide, and two-thirds of nationwide reinstatements take place within the Ninth Circuit.

Question: What is reinstatement of removal?

Answer: Reinstatement of removal is the term for removal pursuant to INA §241(a) (5). Reinstatement of removal orders against those illegally reentering if the Attorney General finds that an alien has reentered the United States illegally after having been removed or having departed voluntarily, under an order of removal, the prior order of removal is reinstated from its original date and is not subject to being reopened or reviewed. The alien is not eligible and may not apply for any relief under this chapter, and the alien shall be removed under the prior order at any time after the reentry.

Reinstatement orders (or orders of reinstatement) are issued by low-level immigration officers, not immigration judges. The orders may be executed within hours or days. Due to the lack of a hearing and speed at which the orders are executed and issued, removal under INA §241(a)(5) is sometimes called summary removal.

Significantly, individuals subject to INA §241(a)(5) are “not eligible and may not apply for any relief” under the Immigration and Nationality Act.

Question: Who is subject to reinstatement of removal?

Answer: Noncitizens who return to the United States illegally after having been removed under a prior order of deportation, exclusion, or removal are subject to removal under §241(a)(5) unless they meet a statutory or judicial exemption.

Question: Who is statutorily exempt from reinstatement of removal under INA §241(a)(5)?

Question: Congress has enacted legislation that specifically exempts the following individuals from being subject to reinstatement of removal: Individuals applying for adjustment of status under INA §245A (the legalization program) who are covered by certain class action lawsuits. Nicaraguans and Cuban applicants for adjustment under §202 of the Nicaraguan Adjustment and Central American Relief Act of 1997 (NACARA). Salvadoran, Guatemalan, and Eastern European applicants under NACARA and Haitian applicants for adjustment under the Haitian Refugee Immigration Fairness Act of 1998 (HRIFA).

Question: Who is judicially exempt from reinstatement of removal under INA §241(a)(5)?

Answer: Litigation in the courts of appeals has resulted in a number of case law exemptions to §241(a)(5). The First, Seventh, and Eleventh Circuits who applied for discretionary relief before April 1, 1997; and the Ninth Circuit who filed an application for adjustment of status and application for permission to reapply for admission to the United States after deportation or removal (aka I-212 waiver) prior to the reinstatement determination.

Question: After issuance of a reinstatement order, can a person apply for any “relief” from removal?

Answer: A final reinstatement order triggers the bar to relief in INA §241(a)(5). However, DHS has previously taken the position that withholding of removal is not a form of relief because it is mandatory, not discretionary. Thus, if a person expresses a fear of return during the reinstatement process, the regulations provide for an interview with an asylum officer. If an asylum officer determines that the person has a “reasonable fear of persecution or torture,” he or she may apply for withholding before an immigration judge.

Question: If the person did not leave under the order of deportation, can it be reinstated?

Answer: No. If the client has not departed since the prior order was issued, then he or she cannot be subject to reinstatement under INA §241(a) (5) because the statute requires an illegal reentry “after having been removed or having departed voluntarily, under an order of removal.”

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/cancellation-for-removal/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/forms-of-relief-in-a-removal-hearing/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/final-order-of-removal/

https://californiaimmigration.us/how-a-deportation-attorney-can-help-you-win-a-cancellation-of-removal-for-non-permanent-residents/

 

Is it possible to go back to USA after life deportation?

It is possible to come back, but some will depend on why you were deported, how long the deportation bar was and whether you have any petitions pending. Generally, you need to do the Permission to Reenter, Waiver of the 10 year bar and Consulate Processing. I would need more specifics from your case.

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/deportation-lawyer/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/deportation-attorneys/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/deportation-order/

https://californiaimmigration.us/removal/winning-a-deportation-proceeding-from-an-immigration-lawyer-and-deportation-attorney/

WT/WB Visa Waiver

There are many countries in the world that do not require formal issuance of a visa to visit the United States. If you are from one of those countries, then you are eligible to come in on either the visa waiver for pleasure as a tourist visa (WT).

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/212d3-waiver/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/212c-waiver-application/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/fee-waiver/

https://californiaimmigration.us/waivers/

BIA rules on Step-Child

The BIA found that a stepchild who meets the definition of a “child” under INA § 101(b)(1)(B), 8 U.S.C. § 1101(b)(1)(B) (2006), is a qualifying relative for purposes of establishing exceptional and extremely unusual hardship for cancellation of removal under the Act. Matter of Portillo-Gutierrez, 25 I&N Dec. 148 (BIA 2009).

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/appeal-to-bia/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/bia-board-of-immigration-appeals/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/appeal-to-bia/

https://californiaimmigration.us/bia-remands-case-back-to-the-judge/

Stepparent who qualifies as a “parent”

A stepparent who qualifies as a “parent” under section
> 101(b)(2) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1101(b)(2)
> (2006), at the time of the proceedings is a qualifying relative for purposes of
> establishing exceptional and extremely unusual hardship for cancellation of
> removal under section 240A(b)(1)(D) of the Act, 8 U.S.C. §
> 1229b(b)(1)(D)(2006)

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/qualifying-relative/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/best-immigration-attorney/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/best-immigration-lawyer/

https://californiaimmigration.us/our-immigration-law-firm/

Skilled or Unskilled Alien Workers

This is a visa to meet temporary needs (H-2’s.) U.S. employers may petition for skilled or unskilled alien workers to meet temporary or seasonal needs in positions for which qualified U.S. workers are not available. It is important to note that both the services for which the employer requests H-2 labor approval and the employer’s need for such services must be temporary. There is currently an annual cap of 66,000 visas for H-2B workers. There is currently no annual cap on visas for H-2A workers. The Department of Labor has compiled a list of H-2B Program Certifications By Occupation for the period June 1, 1999 to May 31, 2000.

The first step to hiring an H-2 worker from outside the U.S. is for the employer to apply for a temporary labor certification with the Department of Labor. These certificates are designed to assure that the admission of aliens to work in this country on a temporary basis will not adversely affect the job opportunities, wages, or working conditions of U.S. workers. The employer is required to file the labor certification with the I-129 petition. For specific procedures on filing, please visit the Department of Labor’s Employment and Training Administration.

Dependents (spouses and unmarried children under 21 years of age) of H-2 workers are entitled to H-4 status with the same restrictions as the principal. Dependents may not be employed under the H-4 classification. A single petition may cover multiple workers if:

  • they will perform the same services
    -they will work in the same location
    -they are included on the same labor certification and,
    -they come from places that are served by the same U.S. consulate, or, if visa exempt, they will enter at the same port of entry.
    -It is not necessary to identify requested H-2A beneficiaries by name (unless only a single worker is needed) if they are unnamed on the underlying labor certification. H-2B beneficiaries must be named unless circumstances (e.g. emergencies) make identification by name impossible. The number of unnamed beneficiaries must always be stated on the petition.
  • Highly skilled workers
  • Skilled workers
  • H2-B 
  • H-2B temporary worker

What is Hardship?

I-601 Approved on Emotional Hardship. There was no medical hardship. Client since entering the United States, the Applicant has never left. Applicant was convicted in 1999 of Violation of section 12500(A) VC(Unlicensed Driver). Sentenced to pay a fine of $82.00 plus a state penalty fund assessment of $153.00; Convicted in 1999 of violation of Section 16018 (A) VC(No proof of car insurance). Sentenced to pay a fine of $500.00. Applicant was also convicted in 2001 of Violation of Section 23152 (B) VC (.08% more weight alcohol Drive Veh). Placed on summary probation for a period of 036 months, served 48 hours in Los Angeles County jail less credit for 24 hours, pay a fine of $500.00 Applicant was convicted in 2000 of Petty theft. Imposition of sentence suspended and placed on informal probation for a period of 3 years, ordered to pay a fine of $300.00.}

Extreme hardship

Extremely unusual hardship

Hardship meaning

Convictions of violence and battery charges in those applying for immigration petitions