Filed under: Immigration Attorney | Tagged: asylum, asylum attorney, Brian D. Lerner, brian lerner, california immigration, cats, Convention Against Torture, credible fear interview, deportation attorney, deportation lawyer, Immigration Lawyer, Law Offices of Brian D. Lerner, los angeles immigration, spanish deportation attorney, spanish deportation lawyer, spanish immigration lawyer, withholding of removal | Leave a comment »
I think I’m going to be killed if I go back to my home country. What can I do?
I fear I’m going to be killed if I go back to my home country. What can I do?
I’m going to be beaten if I’m sent back to my country!
Question: I have to escape my country. I don’t know what to do. I want to go to the United States and try to get help. What can I do?
Answer: Assuming you do not have proper entry documents, the border patrol will try to remove you from the United States. However, if a person subject to expedited removal indicates a wish to apply for asylum or expresses a fear of persecution, he or she must be referred to an asylum officer for an interview. Consultation with counsel is allowed only if it will not unduly delay the process. The asylum officer must keep a written record of the “credible fear” interview.
A person found to have a credible fear will be placed in full removal proceedings. A person found to have a credible fear who establishes identity and that he or she is not a flight risk or a danger to the community should, absent additional factors, be paroled and not detained. In those proceedings, if found inadmissible by the IJ, the respondent may apply for asylum as a form of relief from removal. The respondent also may apply for any other form of relief from removal for which he or she may be eligible.
Question: What exactly does ‘credible fear’ mean?
Answer: The term “credible fear” is defined as “a significant possibility, taking into account the credibility of the statements made by you in support of the your claim and such other facts as are known to the officer, that you could establish eligibility for asylum.”
Question: Is it as difficult to get a credible fear determination as it would be to win asylum?
Answer: A “credible fear of persecution” is a lower standard than that required for an actual grant of asylum. For an actual grant of asylum, the applicant must show that he or she has experienced past persecution or that he or she has a well-founded fear of persecution in the future. The “well-founded” fear standard has been determined to mean that a reasonable person in the applicant’s position would fear persecution.
Question: What if I cannot get the asylum officer to agree and rule and there is a credible fear of persecution?
Answer: If the asylum officer finds that the you do not have a credible fear of persecution, you can request that the Immigration Judge review the asylum officer’s decision. The Immigration Judge may review the asylum officer’s decision either in person or telephonically, within seven days, and you would have to be detained during the review. If the Immigration Judge determines that you do have a credible fear of persecution, then you will be placed in regular INA §240 removal proceedings, in which you may file an application for asylum and withholding of removal.
Question: If either the asylum officer or the Immigration Judge through review determine that there is in fact a credible fear of persecution, will I be detained the entire time?
Answer: Yes, you should be eligible to ask for bond. There are valid cases that state that individuals, other than arriving aliens, who initially were placed in expedited removal but who subsequently passed credible fear interviews and were placed in INA §240 removal proceedings are eligible for bond. For example, people who are in expedited removal because they have been in the United States less than 14 days and are caught within 100 miles of a land border are eligible for bond once they have passed a credible fear interview.
Question: What about stowaways?
Answer: They are eligible for a credible fear interview exactly as anyone else would be eligible.
Question: What will I get if the asylum officer agrees that there is a credible fear?
Answer: The asylum officer will issue you a Form I-863, Notice to Referral to Immigration Judge. Before the Immigration Judge, you may only apply for asylum, withholding of removal, or relief under the Convention Against Torture. Technically, you would not be able to apply for other forms of relief other than asylum or withholding.
Question: If I get a denied credible fear determination, will I get a form?
Answer: You will get written notice of the decision and the negative decision is issued on Form I-869, Record of Negative Credible Fear Finding and Request for Review by Immigration Judge. It may be possible at this point, however, to arrange for a credible fear “reinterview.”
Question: Who is entitled to the ‘credible fear interview’?
Answer: Anyone who enters the United States because they possess either false documents or no documents. A false document may include a facially valid document that an individual obtained fraudulently or through willful misrepresentation of a material fact. Expedited removal also applies to individuals seeking transit through the United States at a port of entry.
Find a good Immigration Lawyer
Immigration work visa lawyer finding a good lawyer
Filed under: Immigration Attorney | Tagged: asylum, asylum attorney, Brian D. Lerner, brian lerner, california immigration attorney, cats, Convention Against Torture, deportation attorney, Expedited Removal, Immigration Attorney | Leave a comment »
100,000 Likes for Facebook Immigration Page
Filed under: Immigration Attorney | Tagged: Brian D. Lerner, brian lerner, c/r, c/r for lprs, california immigration, cancellation, Cancellation of Removal, deportation attorney, deportation lawyer, facebook likes, Immigration Lawyer, Law Offices of Brian D. Lerner, los angeles immigration, spanish deportation attorney, spanish deportation lawyer, spanish immigration lawyer | 2 Comments »
Parole in Place for Adjusting Status through someone in the Military
Parole in Place: How to adjust in the United States even if you don’t qualify
Question: I am married to a U.S. Citizen and I want to adjust to that of a Lawful Permanent Resident. What can I do?
Answer: Are you inside the U.S.?
Question: Yes.
Answer: Did you enter illegally?
Question: Yes?
Answer: Did you commit any crimes, any fraud or have you been issued any deportation orders?
Question: No.
Answer: Is your spouse in the military?
Question: Yes.
Answer: There is a possibility for the immediate family members of U.S. military personnel. Family members of U.S. military personnel often run afoul of our nation’s complex and dysfunctional immigration laws, and the particular burdens imposed on military personnel by their service makes resolving those problems even more difficult than solving similar problems for civilian clients. You may want to consider an application for one of the more common discretionary remedies, a form of immigration parole that is commonly called “parole in place”.
Question: What Is Parole in Place?
Answer: Parole in place (PIP) is a process by which USCIS assists family members of U.S. military personnel to become eligible to “adjust status” in the United States and thus become permanent residents of the United States. Under Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) Section 245(a), a person cannot adjust status unless he or she has been “admitted or paroled” into the United States. Usually, a person who has not been “admitted or paroled” into the United States cannot obtain lawful permanent residence unless he or she leave the United States and travels abroad to a U.S. consulate. If a person who has not been admitted or paroled into the United States leaves the United States and attempts to undergo consular processing, however, the person nearly always faces an inadmissibility bar that is triggered by departing the United States. Thus, the person cannot obtain his or her lawful permanent residence status easily through consular processing. PIP attempts to avoid the separation of military families by allowing some family members—in meritorious cases only—to adjust their status inside the United States and thereby avoid a lengthy separation that might harm the military member’s morale, readiness, or ability to complete his or her service. PIP is granted in order “to preserve family unity and address U.S. Department of Defense concerns regarding soldier safety and readiness for duty.” PIP is also a remedy that appeals to the views of Americans that in wartime, the government should provide special support to military families; when the availability of PIP was made public, 18 members of the House of Representatives, including nine Republicans, wrote to DHS to indicate their support for the program.
PIP is only available to persons who are present in the United States; it should not be confused with the “humanitarian parole” that is available to persons who are outside the United States.
Question: Who Should Request PIP?
Answer: Under current immigration law, no one who entered the United States without inspection can adjust status unless he or she falls into a category in which special rules apply (such special rules apply to asylees, Cubans, special immigrant juveniles, Violence Against Women Act petitioners, grandfathered aliens, and some others). A PIP request is often proper for immediate military family members who entered the United States without inspection, do not have an eligible visa petition or labor certification filed on or before April 30, 2001, and do not otherwise fall into a special adjustment category.
Question: What if the person requesting PIP is in Proceedings?
Answer: PIP is possible when a person is in removal proceedings. If a military family member is in removal proceedings and is granted PIP, an immigration judge (IJ) would be prevented from adjudicating a follow-on adjustment application. USCIS, however, does have jurisdiction to adjudicate an adjustment application in this situation. Family members in this situation may file a new adjustment application with USCIS—after the PIP is granted—and then request termination of proceedings without prejudice to allow them to pursue administrative remedies. Counsel may explain that whether or not the IJ terminates, the respondent will still be eligible to adjust status, and if the case is not terminated and the IJ proceeds, the IJ may be facing a future Motion to Reopen.
Question: Who Should NOT Request PIP?
Answer: A grant of PIP will not resolve immigration problems that involve issues other than ineligibility under INA §245(a). A grant of PIP will not, for example, lift a permanent bar for false claim to United States citizenship; work to waive a criminal ground of inadmissibility; relieve an immigrant of the consequences of a prior deportation or removal order; or allow an immigrant to adjust status when the immigrant needs a waiver of some other ground of inadmissibility. PIP only cures the problem that an immigrant cannot adjust status without showing that he or she has been “admitted or paroled.” PIP is not a magic solution to every immigration problem. It has very limited application to a specific set of circumstances when the military family member has not been admitted or paroled in a manner that allows adjustment under INA §245(a).
Requesting PIP may also not be advisable when there is no military-related reason to grant the PIP. For example, USCIS may determine not to grant PIP when the military member is about to be discharged from the military; when the military member is serving as an inactive Reserve member; or when a military member is stationed abroad (there, the family member’s presence in the United States is not necessary for a military-related reason).
A military family member also does not need PIP if the military family member was admitted lawfully but has no documentation of the entry.
Question: How Do I Request PIP?
Answer: The PIP program is new, and as of this writing, no formal regulatory guidance has been issued by DHS or USCIS. Practitioners report a variety of different approaches at different USCIS offices.
In most USCIS field offices, a PIP request consists of a hardship letter signed by the service member and supporting documentation, which should be submitted to the local USCIS office having jurisdiction over the service member’s residence or place of duty. An example of the list of requirements from the Los Angeles USCIS Office is reproduced in the Appendix.
The opening paragraph of the hardship letter should state that this is a request for a parole in place so that the particular military family member can file an Application to Register Permanent Residence or Adjust Status (I-485) while in the United States. The body of the letter should describe the circumstances that led the service member to join the armed forces. The letter should then describe the history of the military member’s relationship with the family member seeking PIP; establishing the bona fide nature of the relationship is extremely important, as USCIS is unlikely to grant PIP in any case in which there are indicators of marriage fraud. The family member’s immigration status should be discussed, including the status of any petitions filed for the family member, such as an I-130. The conditions of the family member’s home country at the time he or she came to the United States should be discussed. The current conditions may be mentioned if they are such that a return to the country would pose a danger to the family member’s health or safety. If applicable, the family member’s loss of Commissary and Post Exchange privileges, military housing, access to military family member health care, and assistance from the Family Readiness Group may be mentioned. Finally, the hardship the service member would experience if the family member were deported should be described in detail. If the service member or the service member’s children have special needs that make them especially dependent on the family member for support, these needs should be explained and supporting documentation provided where appropriate. At a minimum, the body of the letter must contain the service member’s name, date of birth, place of birth, rank in military, branch of service, and unit of assignment, as well as the dates and places of birth of the family member and any children. Any upcoming deployments for which the service member is preparing should be mentioned.
Question: What documents should be provided?
Answer: Generally, you want to provide the following: The service member’s birth certificate and proof of U.S. citizenship (if applicable); The family member’s birth certificate; The birth certificates of any children; If the family member is the spouse, the couple’s marriage certificate and evidence of the bona fide nature of the marriage; The family member’s military family member identification card; A copy of Defense Eligibility Enrollment Reporting System enrollment documentation for the family member; Two original passport photos of the family member; A copy of any deployment orders for the service member; and additional documents that substantiate the case of hardship can be enclosed as well.
Question: Will the PIP Request be Granted?
Answer: A Parole in place determinations are made on a case-by-case basis and are purely discretionary. Your client should not assume his or her request is approved until USCIS officially notifies him or her of the approval. Typically, clients are notified to come for an interview with a USCIS officer who is specially trained to handle PIP applications, and that officer will make an initial determination whether to grant the PIP, but the officer’s decision will be reviewed at a higher level before the PIP request is approved.
Filed under: Immigration Attorney | Tagged: Brian D. Lerner, brian lerner, california immigration attorney, california immigration lawyer, Immigration Attorney, Immigration Lawyer, military citizlenship, Military Naturalization, parole in place, pip | Leave a comment »
Another win for the Law Offices of Prosecutorial Discretion
Prosecutorial Discretion granted for a family of 3; father, mother and daughter. Parents had applied for cancellation of removal for non Lawful Permanent Residents, but they did not have a very strong case. Daughter also applied but did not have a qualifying relative, so she needed one of her parents to be granted.
Filed under: Immigration Attorney | Tagged: Brian D. Lerner, brian lerner, Immigration Attorney, Immigration Lawyer, pd, prosecutorial discretion | 1 Comment »
Another Win for the Law Offices of Brian D. Lerner
I-751 Divorce Waiver approved. Client retained us after he had received an RFE on a joint I-751 but he had since separated from his wife. We filed the necessary documents and then appeared at his interview. A second RFE was issued requesting Client’s final divorce decree, a statement in his own words and a request to change the case from a joint filing to a divorce waiver. Case approved 1 year after 2nd RFE.
The Law Offices of Brian D. Lerner, APC
Filed under: Immigration Attorney | Tagged: Brian D. Lerner, brian lerner, Immigration Attorney, request for evidence, rfe | Leave a comment »
Criminal Relief for Crimes affecting immigration
Criminal and immigration lawyers must work together to help you
Filed under: criminal relief | Tagged: #hangoutsonair, #hoa, Brian D. Lerner, brian lerner, california immigration, criminal relief, deportation attorney, deportation lawyer, Hangouts On Air, immigration crime, Immigration Lawyer, immigration waiver, Law Offices of Brian D. Lerner, los angeles immigration, spanish deportation attorney, spanish deportation lawyer, spanish immigration lawyer | Leave a comment »
Another Win for the Law Offices of Brian D. Lerner
AOS approved for Client who is from Mexico, is married to a USC and they have 6 children (including quintuplets). Client left the United States 2004/2005 and they’re 10 year bar waiver was denied (they didn’t have an attorney) or children at the time. He re entered the U.S. and then left in 2010 because he had no identification and wanted to avoid any issues with Immigration. Our office was retained for a humanitarian parole in 2011 based on one of their children being very very sick. His parole was approved and his I-94 indicated “Paroled in for AOS.” His case was approved today with no issues.
USCIS Inventory of employment based AOS cases pending at the service centers and field officers
Law Offices of Brian D. Lerner, APC
Filed under: Immigration Attorney | Tagged: adjusment of status, adjustment, Adjustment of Status, Brian D. Lerner, brian lerner, california immigration attorney, Immigration Attorney, Immigration Lawyer, immigration wins, los angeles immigration attorney | 2 Comments »
How can I apply for Cancellation of Removal for Lawful Permanent Residents?
I’m in Deportation Proceedings. Can I apply for Cancellation of Removal?
Question: I’m in deportation proceedings and somebody stated I can apply for Cancellation of Removal. Can you shed some light on this and what is required?
Answer: The Attorney General may cancel the may cancel the removal of an Lawful Permanent Resident (LPR) if he or she: Has been “lawfully admitted for permanent residence” for 5 years, been physically present inside the United States for 7 years, is not convicted of an aggravated felony and in the discretion of the Immigration Judge, Cancellation of Removal should be granted.
Question: What is meant by being lawfully admitted for permanent Residence for 5 years?
Answer: On it’s face, it is fairly clear. It means when you have received your lawful permanent residency and you must have at least 5 years of residency upon applying for Cancellation of Removal. However, a person who obtained LPR status by fraud or mistake is deemed to have not been “lawfully admitted for permanent residence. An example would be where LPR status fraudulently obtained through bigamous marriage, respondent ineligible for cancellation. Other examples would be: Where petitioner fully disclosed his prior drug conviction but DHS granted AOS by mistake. A person given Voluntary Departure breaks the residency and would not have qualified if less than 5 years of residency. Basically you want to look at and determine if there was any fraud at the inception of obtaining residency. If you are not an actual resident now, this will also not work.
Question:What is meant by being physically present in the United States for 7 years?
Answer: Again, on its most basic level, this would apply assuming you entered the United States legally over 7 years ago. However, there are some issues. For example, continuous residence not required where the person has served in an active duty status in the Armed Forces for a minimum of 24 months and if separated, was honorably discharged, and was in the U.S. at the time of enlistment or induction.
Admission in “any status” includes admission as a temporary resident. The 7-year period must be continuous. Although physical presence is not the test, traveling back and to a foreign country will preclude you from establishing continuous residence. The 7-year period is deemed to end when the person is served with an Notice to Appear or has committed an offense that renders him or her inadmissible or removable Applicant may accrue a new 7 years when he sought to reenter as LPR after commission of a crime.
Question: What is meant by an aggravated Felony?
Answer: Since 1996, the definition of what is considered to be an aggravated felony has greatly increased. Therefore, if the Immigration Judge rules that you have committed and aggravated felon, then you will not be eligible for Cancellation of Removal for Lawful Permanent Residents. Now if you happen to have an undisputed aggravated felony, then it would be advisable to try to seek criminal relief on that particular crime so that you can either vacate it or reduce it so that you will not be considered an aggravated felon.
Question: If I do not meet either the 5 years of Lawful Permanent Residency, or the 7 years of physical presence, can I use the presence of my mother or father who would easily meet these requirements and add it to my current residency?
Answer: The Board of Immigration Appeals has held that a parent’s LPR status may not be imputed to give a child the necessary 5 years of LPR status to qualify for cancellation. It has been held that it is a reasonable construction of the statute to require each applicant to separately meet the residence requirements, and neither the 5 years of LPR status nor the 7 years of lawful admission requires the imputation of the parents’ residence to the child.
Question: What is meant by the stop-time rule?
Answer: This is basically if you commit a specified crime within either the 5 year residency requirement or the 7 year physical presence requirement, it stops the time from accruing, thereby possibly making you ineligible for Cancellation of Removal for Lawful Permanent Residents. Therefore, it would be critical to find out when the crime occurred and whether it renders you ineligible for Cancellation of Removal for Lawful Permanent Residents.
California immigration attorney
Special cancellation of removal
Filed under: Cancellation of Removal | Tagged: #hangoutsonair, #hoa, Brian D. Lerner, brian lerner, c/r, c/r for lprs, california immigration, cancellation, Cancellation of Removal, deportation attorney, deportation lawyer, Hangouts On Air, Immigration Lawyer, Law Offices of Brian D. Lerner, los angeles immigration, spanish deportation attorney, spanish deportation lawyer, spanish immigration lawyer | 1 Comment »
Winning a deportation case through Cancellation of Removal
How a deportation attorney can help you win a cancellation of removal for non permanent residents
Filed under: Cancellation of Removal | Tagged: #hangoutsonair, #hoa, Brian D. Lerner, brian lerner, c/r, c/r for lprs, california immigration, cancellation, Cancellation of Removal, deportation attorney, deportation lawyer, Hangouts On Air, Immigration Lawyer, Law Offices of Brian D. Lerner, los angeles immigration, spanish deportation attorney, spanish deportation lawyer, spanish immigration lawyer | Leave a comment »
