Posted on April 10, 2020 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney
The Ninth Circuit upheld a ruling blocking a policy that categorically denied bond hearings to asylum seekers, targeted at individuals who immigration officers previously determined have a “credible fear” of persecution or torture if returned to the places they fled.
Filed under: best deportation attorney | Tagged: asylum, bond, bond hearing asylum hearing | Leave a comment »
Posted on July 8, 2019 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney
In Padilla v. ICE, a district court judge issued a decision that requires immigration courts to continue to provide bond hearings to individuals fleeing persecution who enter the United States without inspection, are placed in expedited removal proceedings, and pass their credible fear interviews. The decision is set to take effect on July 16, 2019.
Filed under: best deportation attorney | Tagged: asylum, bond, bond hearings, M-S-, padilla | Leave a comment »
Posted on April 15, 2019 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney
In Padilla v. ICE, the court issued a preliminary injunction requiring the government to provide certain detained asylum seekers with a bond hearing within seven days of a bond hearing request and to release those individuals whose detention time exceeds that limit.
Filed under: best deportation attorney | Tagged: asylum, bond, bond hearing, Detention, ICE, immigration detention | Leave a comment »
Posted on October 17, 2017 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney
The Ninth Circuit affirmed the district court’s order granting a preliminary injunction in favor of the plaintiffs, a class of noncitizens in removal proceedings who are detained under INA §236(a) in the Central District of California and are unable to afford the amount of bond set by immigration officials. Finding that the plaintiffs were likely to succeed on the merits of their due process claim, the court held that the district court did not abuse its discretion in granting a preliminary injunction requiring immigration officials when making bond determinations to, among other things, consider (1) financial ability to obtain bond and (2) alternative conditions of release.
Filed under: best deportation attorney | Tagged: ability to pay, bond, temporary injunction | Leave a comment »
Posted on October 3, 2017 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney
There are indications that ICE has revoked a policy issued in August 2016 recommending that pregnant people “generally not be detained” and is currently detaining pregnant people “at the rate of one per day.” Cases of pregnant women being detained by ICE have been detailed in an administrative complaint filed with DHS on behalf of these women.
Filed under: best deportation attorney | Tagged: bond, detainer, Detention, H-1b's to open up in April, ICE, pregnant woman | Leave a comment »
Posted on August 16, 2016 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney
The Second Circuit affirmed the district court, finding that a reinstated removal order is not final during the pendency of withholding-only proceedings, and thus, the detention of individuals with reinstated orders of removal and in withholding-only proceedings is governed by INA §236(a), which permits release on bond.
https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/bond/
https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/bond-hearing/
https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/bond-hearings/
https://californiaimmigration.us/removal/judicial-review/
Filed under: Immigration Attorney | Tagged: bond, Reinstatement of Removal, withholding of removal | Leave a comment »
Posted on August 11, 2016 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney
- In a precedent decision issued today, the BIA held that, in determining whether a noncitizen presents a danger to the community at large and thus should not be released on bond pending removal proceedings, an IJ should consider both direct and circumstantial evidence of dangerousness, including whether the facts and circumstances present national security considerations. Accordingly, the BIA affirmed the IJ’s denial of the respondent’s request for release on bond, finding that he failed to show that, based on the totality of the facts and circumstances presented, he did not present a danger to the community pursuant to INA §236(a).
Bond meaning
Bond hearing
Bond hearings and immigration
Got dond? Get a LA deportation Attorney
Filed under: Immigration Attorney | Tagged: bond, Immigration, Immigration Attorney, Immigration Law, Immigration Lawyer, syrian citizen | Leave a comment »
Posted on August 8, 2016 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney
In a decision issued yesterday, the Eleventh Circuit affirmed the district court’s dismissal of the plaintiff’s Bivens action against various government officials, holding that no Bivensremedy is available to a plaintiff who claims that immigration officials unconstitutionally prolonged his detention. The plaintiff had been ordered removed, and although ICE does not effectuate removals to Cuba, he remained in ICE custody for an amount of time greatly exceeding the 90-day statutory period for removal, from November 25, 2008, until October 21, 2009.
https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/bivens-claim/
https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/bond/
https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/bond-hearing/
https://californiaimmigration.us/got-bond-get-a-los-angeles-deportation-attorney/
Filed under: Immigration Attorney | Tagged: bivens claim, bond, Detention | Leave a comment »
Posted on August 8, 2016 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney
In a class action habeas petition brought by noncitizens with criminal convictions subject to mandatory detention under INA §236(c), the Ninth Circuit affirmed the district court’s class certification order and preliminary injunction requiring the government to provide all class members with bond hearings under §236(a). The court held that, under the plain language of §236(c), the government may detain without a bond hearing only those noncitizens with criminal convictions whom it takes into immigration custody “promptly” upon their release from the triggering criminal custody, not those detained long after.
https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/mandatory-detention/
https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/detention/
https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/immigration-detention/
https://californiaimmigration.us/removal/detention-in-deportation-proceedings/
Filed under: Immigration Attorney | Tagged: bond, mandatory detention | Leave a comment »
Posted on November 30, 2015 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney
The Second Circuit affirmed the judgment of the District Court for the Southern District of New York, holding that, in order to avoid the constitutional concerns raised by indefinite detention, an immigrant detained pursuant to INA §236(c) must be afforded a bond hearing before an Immigration Judge within six months of his or her detention. Following the Ninth Circuit, the court also held that the detainee must be admitted to bail unless the government establishes by clear and convincing evidence that the immigrant poses a risk of flight or a risk of danger to the community.
https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/detention-2/
https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/artesia-detention-facility/
https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/child-detention-immigration/
https://californiaimmigration.us/removal/detention-in-deportation-proceedings/
Filed under: Detention | Tagged: 236(c), 6 month bond, bond, mandatory detention, release | Leave a comment »