• Hours & Info

    (562) 495-0554
    M-F: 8:00am - 6:00 p.m.
    Sat: 9:00 a.m. - 12:00 p.m.
  • Past Blog Posts

  • https://api.whatsapp.com/send?phone=13104885414

BIA Finds Subsequent NTA Perfects Deficient NTA and Ends Accrual of Physical Presence for Purposes of Voluntary Departure

the BIA ruled that if an NTA fails to specify the time/place of an initial removal hearing, a subsequent NTA with the information perfects the deficient NTA and ends the accrual of physical presence for purposes of voluntary departure. Additionally, last week, the BIA ruled that §58-37-8(2)(a)(i) of the Utah Code, which criminalizes possession of a controlled substance, is divisible with respect to the specific “controlled substance” involved in a violation of that statute.

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/9th-circuit-court-of-appeals/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/arrests-in-court/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/appeals-court/

https://californiaimmigration.us/losing-at-the-immigration-court-is-not-the-end-get-a-long-beach-deportation-lawyer-to-appeal-to-the-board-of-immigration-appeals/

EOIR Final Rule on Appellate Procedures and Administrative Closure

Appellate procedures and administrative closures have changed

https://atomic-temporary-10880024.wpcomstaging.com/tag/9th-circuit-court-of-appeals/

https://atomic-temporary-10880024.wpcomstaging.com/tag/administrative-appeals-office-aao-2/

https://atomic-temporary-10880024.wpcomstaging.com/tag/appeals/

https://californiaimmigration.us/bia-remands-case-where-defendant-appeals-in-absentia-order/

BIA Rules on Adverse Credibility Findings Based on Fraudulent Documents

The BIA found that immigration judges may find a document to be fraudulent without forensic analysis if it contains obvious defects or readily identifiable hallmarks of fraud and the party submitting the document is given an opportunity to explain the defects.

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/appeal-to-bia/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/bia/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/motion-to-reopen-with-the-bia/

https://californiaimmigration.us/bia-deference-given-to-particulary-serious-crime/

BIA Holds Oregon Conviction for Child Neglect Is a Crime of Child Abuse Under INA §237(a)(2)(E)(i)

The BIA ruled that a conviction for child neglect in the second degree under §163.545(1) of the Oregon Revised Statutes is categorically a “crime of child abuse, child neglect, or child abandonment” under INA §237(a)(2)(E)(i). 

Ninth Circuit Vacates and Remands BIA’s Decision in Matter of E—R—A—L—

9th Circuit Court

The Ninth Circuit issued an order granting the petitioner’s unopposed motion to vacate the BIA’s decision in Matter of E—R—A—L—, which pertains to establishing a particular social group based on landownership, and granted the government’s motion to remand to the BIA for further proceedings.

BIA Rules on Expert Testimony and Factual Findings

The BIA ruled that expert testimony is evidence, but only an immigration judge makes factual findings, and that when a factual finding is inconsistent with an expert’s opinion, judges should explain the reasons behind the factual findings. 

BIA Finds Evidence of Prior Fraudulent Marriage Precludes Approval of Subsequent Marriage-Based Visa Petition

The BIA ruled that, when there is probative evidence that a beneficiary’s prior marriage was fraudulent and entered into to evade immigration laws, a subsequent visa petition filed on the beneficiary’s behalf is properly denied under §204(c) of the INA. 

Attorney General erases duress exception for persecutors seeking asylum

AG Barr issued a decision that unwound a Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) ruling that allowed persecutors to apply for asylum if they could prove they were forced into their bad acts, saying past and present legislation clashed with the exception. This decision eliminated a narrow crack in the “persecutor bar,” which prevents anyone who has participated in the victimization of individuals from seeking asylum in the U.S. This decision vacated a June 2018 order from a split BIA panel, and shifted the burden of proof from DHS to asylum-seekers.

BIA Rules It Is Inappropriate for the Board to Use Discretion to Reopen and Vacate an IJ’s Frivolousness Finding

The BIA ruled that, absent ineffective assistance of counsel or a showing undermining the validity and finality of the finding, it is inappropriate for the Board to exercise its discretion to reopen a case and vacate an immigration judge’s (IJ) frivolousness finding.

BIA Rules That Cancellation of Removal Despite Criminal Conviction Precludes a Later Finding of Deportability Based on the Same Conviction

The BIA ruled that, if a criminal conviction was charged as a ground of removability when cancellation of removal was granted, that conviction cannot serve as the sole factual predicate for a charge of removability in subsequent removal proceedings.