The BIA ruled that expert testimony is evidence, but only an immigration judge makes factual findings, and that when a factual finding is inconsistent with an expert’s opinion, judges should explain the reasons behind the factual findings.
Home » Immigration Updates » BIA Rules on Expert Testimony and Factual Findings
BIA Rules on Expert Testimony and Factual Findings
Related Posts
Ninth Circuit Vacates and Remands BIA’s Decision in Matter of E—R—A—L—
The Ninth Circuit issued an order granting the petitioner’s unopposed motion to vacate the BIA’s decision in Matter of E—R—A—L—, which pertains to establishing a particular social group based on landownership, and granted the government’s motion to remand to the BIA for further proceedings.
BIA Finds Evidence of Prior Fraudulent Marriage Precludes Approval of Subsequent Marriage-Based Visa Petition
The BIA ruled that, when there is probative evidence that a beneficiary’s prior marriage was fraudulent and entered into to evade immigration laws, a subsequent visa petition…
Attorney General erases duress exception for persecutors seeking asylum
AG Barr issued a decision that unwound a Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) ruling that allowed persecutors to apply for asylum if they could prove they…
BIA Rules It Is Inappropriate for the Board to Use Discretion to Reopen and Vacate an IJ’s Frivolousness Finding
The BIA ruled that, absent ineffective assistance of counsel or a showing undermining the validity and finality of the finding, it is inappropriate for the Board to…