• Hours & Info

    (562) 495-0554
    M-F: 8:00am - 6:00 p.m.
    Sat: 9:00 a.m. - 12:00 p.m.
  • Past Blog Posts

  • https://api.whatsapp.com/send?phone=13104885414

EOIR issued an interim rule with a request for comments amending the DOJ regulations relating to the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) by adding two Board member positions, expanding the BIA to 17 members. This rule is effective today. Comments must be submitted by August 3, 2015.

BIA

Board of immigration appeals

Appeal to BIA

BIA Deference given to particulary serious crime

In a precedent decision issued yesterday, the BIA held that a respondent who has voted in an election involving candidates for federal office in violation of 18 USC §611(a) is removable under section 237(a)(6)(A) of the INA, regardless of whether the respondent knew that he or she was committing an unlawful act by voting. The BIA reasoned that because the respondent, an LPR who had disclosed during a naturalization interview that she had voted in an election in 2006 that included a local school board race, had intentionally voted in an election involving candidates for federal office, the general intent requirement of §611(a) was satisfied.

BIA

Board of immigration appeals

Appeal to BIA

BIA deference given to particulary serious crime

 

 

 

The BIA Overturned! The evidence was not

The BIA Overturned! The evidence was not properly considered http://ow.ly/rPiEQ

Appeal to BIA

Board of immigration appeals

BIA overturned

BIA rules on step child

CA4 Finds BIA Applied Wrong Standard of Review

The court found that the BIA had reviewed the immigration judge’s factual findings, used to grant the petitioner’s request to defer removal, under a de novo standard of review instead of under the required clearly erroneous standard.

https://atomic-temporary-10880024.wpcomstaging.com/tag/bia-2/

https://atomic-temporary-10880024.wpcomstaging.com/tag/bia-board-of-immigration-appeals/

https://atomic-temporary-10880024.wpcomstaging.com/tag/bia/

https://californiaimmigration.us/bia-deference-given-to-particulary-serious-crime/

What is the legal basis the Supreme Court used to rule why the BIA’s 212(c) ruling was arbitrary

Video: What is the legal basis the Supreme Court used to rule why the BIA’s 212(c) ruling was arbitrary – Avvo.com http://ping.fm/a43lH

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/bia-2/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/appeal-to-bia/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/bia/

https://californiaimmigration.us/circuit-court-of-appeal-reverses-bia-denial-of-asylum/

Petitioner could present the error to the BIA

The court found that a translation error in a medical document corroborating Petitioner’s injuries contributed significantly to the IJ’s adverse credibility finding, and stayed the appeal so that Petitioner could present the error to the BIA.

BIA

Board of immigration appeals

Appeal to BIA

BIA decisions

The Executive Office of Immigration Review (EOIR)

The Executive Office of Immigration Review (EOIR) press release announcing the 10th anniversary of the BIA Pro Bono Project. The Project was implemented in 2001 to improve access to legal information and increase pro bono representation for individuals being detained while their immigration cases are under appeal.

BIA rules on adverse credibility findings based on fraudulent documents

BIA pro bono project

Board of immigration appeals

BIA eligibility

BIA Pro Bono Project

The Executive Office of Immigration Review (EOIR) press release announcing the 10th anniversary of the BIA Pro Bono Project. The Project was implemented in 2001 to improve access to legal information and increase pro bono representation for individuals being detained while their immigration cases are under appeal.

Husband and wife appealed the Board of Immigration Appeals’ decision denying their petitions for asylum

Where husband and wife appealed the Board of Immigration Appeals’ decision denying their petitions for asylum and withholding of removal and relief under the Convention Against Torture, and husband’s petition for review was deemed moot after he died, court of appeals retained jurisdiction to consider wife’s derivative petition because there could be collateral consequences if it was dismissed. Wife’s derivative claim failed because substantial evidence supported immigration judge’s adverse credibility finding against husband where his application and attached declaration were inconsistent–with one stating that he was a Hindu who feared violence by Muslims and the other stating that he was a Muslim who feared violence by Hindus–and where husband’s omission of details was misleading in light of his later claims

The BIA

Board of immigration appeals

Appeal to BIA

BIA issues two crime related decisions

Board of Immigration Appeals might have jurisdiction over his claim

Ninth Circuit decisions and those of other circuits provided petitioner, who claimed that ineffective assistance of counsel occurred after a final order of removal had been entered, with fair notice and the ability to anticipate that the Board of Immigration Appeals might have jurisdiction over his claim. District court did not err in dismissing habeas corpus petition for failure to satisfy prudential requirement that petitioner exhaust administrative remedies. Singh v. Napolitano – filed August 23, 2010

BIA Just a stepping stone 

BIA appealing 

The BIA ruling 

BIA decisions