Posted on July 28, 2021 by sethlerner1964
Attorney General (AG) Garland ruled that, while rulemaking proceeds and except when a court of appeals has held otherwise, immigration judges and the BIA should apply the standard for administrative closure set out in Avetisyan and W—Y—U—. AILA Executive Director Ben Johnson welcomed “this return to a more effective and efficient immigration court system,” but also noted that “the necessity of this decision only underscores the need for a truly independent immigration court system.”
https://www.uscis.gov/
https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/expert-immigration-attorney/
https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/immigration-attorney
https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/california-immigration-attorney/
Filed under: Case Denied, immigration and customs enforcement, immigration appeals, Immigration Attorney, Immigration Bill, immigration case, Immigration Court, Immigration Judges | Tagged: administrative closure, ag garland, Immigration Judges | Leave a comment »
Posted on September 10, 2019 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney
The Fourth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals ruled in Zuniga Romero v. Barr that immigration judges have the authority to administratively close cases pending before them. The court concluded that immigration law unambiguously permits immigration judges to control their own dockets.
Filed under: best deportation attorney | Tagged: 4th circuit, administrative closure, ag, attorney general, barr, fourth circuit | Leave a comment »
Posted on September 26, 2017 by Brian D. Lerner, Immigration Lawyer & Deportation Attorney
Matter of W-Y-U-, 27 I&N Dec. 17 (BIA 2017)
(1) The primary consideration for an Immigration Judge in evaluating whether to administratively close or recalendar proceedings is whether the party opposing administrative closure has provided a persuasive reason for the case to proceed and be resolved on the merits. Matter of Avetisyan, 25 I&N Dec. 688 (BIA 2012), clarified.
(2) In considering administrative closure, an Immigration Judge cannot review whether an alien falls within the enforcement priorities of the Department of Homeland Security, which has exclusive jurisdiction over matters of prosecutorial discretion.
https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/immigration-case/
https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/immigrationattorney/
https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/american-immigration-attorney/
https://californiaimmigration.us/our-immigration-law-firm/
Filed under: immigration case | Tagged: administrative closure, Immigration Court, termination | Leave a comment »