• Hours & Info

    (562) 495-0554
    M-F: 8:00am - 6:00 p.m.
    Sat: 9:00 a.m. - 12:00 p.m.
  • Past Blog Posts

  • https://api.whatsapp.com/send?phone=13104885414

7th Circ. denies Texas’ bid to revive public charge rule

Seventh Circuit denied an attempt by 14 states led by Texas to revive the Trump administration’s public charge policy, which penalizes immigrants for using certain public benefits, after the Biden administration decided not to defend it. The appellate court did not provide a reason for its decision, which followed an announcement from DHS that it would no longer support the rule in courts around the country. The policy had faced lawsuits and been temporarily barred by multiple courts while it was being litigated. The Ninth Circuit has yet to rule on the Arizona-led coalition’s motion to intervene on the same issue. Arizona has said in court filings that it plans to bring the policy to the Supreme Court.

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/lawsuit-against-new-public-charge-rule/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/another-case-on-yet-the-public-charge-rule/

https://californiaimmigration.us/end-to-trump-administrations-public-charge-wealth-test/

https://cbocalbos.wordpress.com/tag/new-public-charge-rule/

Court Reverses Denial of CAT Relief Based on Internal Relocation Regulations

The Ninth Circuit issued an en banc decision that overruled previous decisions to the extent that they conflicted with the plain text reading of the regulations governing internal relocation and deferral of removal under CAT. The court held that neither the petitioner nor the government bears the burden of proof as to internal relocation; rather, such evidence, if relevant, must be considered in assessing whether it is more likely than not that the petitioner would be tortured if removed.